Saturday, August 17, 2019

NO, DON’T DEPORT ZAKIR NAIK YET – CHARGE & TRY HIM IN MALAYSIA FIRST IF HE HAS BROKEN LAWS HERE: NGO ‘APPALLED’ BY CALLS TO LET FUGITIVE PREACHER OFF WITHOUT PUTRAJAYA TEACHING HIM A LESSON TO RESPECT MALAYSIA’S LAWS(Malaysian Chronicle)

NO, DON’T DEPORT ZAKIR NAIK YET – CHARGE & TRY HIM IN MALAYSIA FIRST IF HE HAS BROKEN LAWS HERE: NGO ‘APPALLED’ BY CALLS TO LET FUGITIVE PREACHER OFF WITHOUT PUTRAJAYA TEACHING HIM A LESSON TO RESPECT MALAYSIA’S LAWS


Police restriction of Human Rights, including Freedom of Expression is Wrong
MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) is appalled by the calls of many in Malaysian including Pakatan Harapan-led government’s Ministers Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman, Gobind Singh, M Kulasegaran and Xavier Jayakumar that Indian national, Zakir Naik, be deported. (Star, 14/8/2019). If Zakir Naik had committed an offence in Malaysia, then they should be asking that he be charged and accorded a fair trial.

If someone has committed a crime, it is unconscionable, especially for Members of Parliament or Ministers, to simply ask that he be send out of the country beyond the jurisdiction of the Malaysian courts. They should be pushing for Zakir Naik to be charged and tried him in a Malaysia. This could be done very fast given the facts and circumstances of this case.

Human Rights is for everyone – Police cannot decide on which rights and how exercisable

MADPET is appalled that the police has prevented Zakir Naik from speaking.  “Zakir can come to Perlis, but he can’t talk and action will be taken against him if he does so,” SAC Noor Mushar[Perlis police chief] said..’(Star, 16/8/2019). “As Perlis police chief, I do not allow Zakir Naik to attend the programmes today as he has been raising issues that can threaten the general peace of Malaysians,” he told a press conference.( FMT, 16/8/2019). This is against one’s freedom of expression and opinion, and it is wrong for the police to arbitrarily do this. Are we a police state, where the police chief has so much power?

He also said Naik should inform state police in the future what he plans to speak on. “The way he talks, not everyone likes it. People of other races are unhappy. If he wants to talk, ask him to inform us first what he wants to talk, let us vet it.”(FMT, 16/8/2019).

It is certainly wrong, and discriminatory. Will the police be requiring every other speaker at any public events to tell the police in advance, what he/she will say – and then the police will ‘decide’ what you can say and what you cannot say? This is a violation of our Human Rights.

What law is the police relying on? Is it that draconian Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 that allows the police to impose ‘restrictions’ and ‘conditions’ on the exercise of our right to peaceful assembly? The Peaceful Assembly Act, a law that police can arbitrarily impose whatever restrictions and conditions, ought to be repealed. A violation of any such police restrictions and/or conditions now becomes a crime.

We recall during the Barisan Nasional reign, there was, I believe, at least one DAP organized event where the police imposed a condition that there be no political speeches. The same also did happen in other peaceful assemblies.

Well, such draconian laws must be repealed, one should always be free to exercise one’s freedom of expression and opinion, and also the right to peaceful assembly. If however later, there is a breach of law in the exercising such rights and freedoms, then the said person/s could be investigated, charged and/or tried for the said crimes.

We may not agree or even be angered by someone’s opinion or speech, but that is what the right to freedom of expression is all about. It is not only the right to say things that we agree, but also to say things that may annoy us. It is a human right, and it must be respected.

It is sad that 2 Ministers, Gobind Singh Deo and M Kulasegaran were also reported asking that restrictions be placed on the Zakir Naik that he not be able to speak at public forums, or say anything that will jeopardize race relations and public order in Malaysia. (Berita Harian, 14/8/2019)

One must never forget the legal principle that one is innocent until one is proven guilty in a court of law after a fair trial. Even if this relates to the infamous Zakir Naik, there is no justification for the police to impose a ‘gag order’ or restrict any of his human rights.

Are the 2 Ministers asking for Detention Without Trial laws, like the Prevention of Crimes Act 1959 (POCA), Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015 (POTA) and the Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985, whereby these laws allow for administrative detention and restrictions to be imposed? Under such laws, it is only the administration, not the judiciary that imposes such restrictions and/or detentions, and the victim cannot even challenge the reasons for detention/restrictions in court vide a judicial review.

Sadly, the new ‘alternative’ government has not yet abolished Detention without Trial laws in Malaysia. MADPET calls for all Detention Without Trial laws to be abolished. The right to a fair trial must be respected in all cases.

If there is desire to gag Zakir Naik, or to restrict his freedom to talk about certain matters, then rightfully an application to court should be made, where the said Zakir Naik rightfully will be given a right to be heard, before the court decides on the matter.

Refugees and/or Asylum Seekers should not send back

It is unclear whether Zakir Naik is a refugee or an asylum seeker in Malaysia, as Malaysia sadly to date, we still do not have a law on Refugees and Asylum Seekers. As such, legally we cannot say who is a refugee or asylum seeker in Malaysia according to our laws – and it is wrong for the government of the day to simply decide according to their whims and fancies. One wonders whether the United Nations High Commission for Refugees in Malaysia has even considered and/or classified Zakir Naik as an asylum seeker or refugee.

If Zakir Naik is a refugee or asylum seeker, then Malaysia must not violate the principle of non-refoulement by deporting or repatriating him back to India or any other country where there is a risk that he may later be send to India.

All we know is that Malaysia’s previous Barisan Nasional had in 2015 granted the said Zakir Naik a Permanent Residency (PR) status. This means that any of his children born thereafter will be Malaysian citizens. It is odd, when so many foreign spouses of Malaysians, even after 10 years, still do not have PR status when they should justly be accorded PR status on registration of marriages, whereby such PR status could be reviewed when and if marriages dissolves.

For a refugee and/or asylum seeker, a PR status in the first instance should not have been granted rather a temporary visa or a ‘refugee’ visa that allows him/her to remain in Malaysia. If after some years, maybe there could be a consideration whether to accord him/her PR status, or even Malaysian citizenship. This again stresses the importance of a Refugee and Asylum Seeker law in Malaysia.

This new government, as such, could review and even cancel his PR status, and in its place grant him a long social visit visa, which could be for a year or even longer, with the possibility of renewal. If Malaysia had a Refugee and Asylum Seeker law, then surely there would, in that law, be provision for special visas for them to stay, or even work in Malaysia.

Zakir is wanted in India on charges of laundering more than 1.93 billion rupees (RM115.66 million) from proceeds of criminal activities in India and overseas.(The Sun Daily, 14/7/2019), and as such, one wonders whether he is a refugee or an asylum seeker. Many Malaysians involved in the 1MDB, SRC and other scandals are wanted by Malaysia for the purpose of investigation and possible prosecution, would they too be considered refugees and asylum seekers by other countries, who will refuse to send them back to Malaysia to face justice?

Malaysia certainly do not want to end up being seen as a safe haven for suspected criminals.

Police Investigations Have Commenced

It is to be noted that the Malaysian police has stated that the ‘India-born preacher Dr Zakir Naik is under investigation for provocation stemming from his remarks about Malaysia’s minority communities during an event in Kelantan last week. Federal Criminal Investigation Department director Commissioner Datuk Huzir Mohamed confirmed the probe under Section 504 of the Penal Code for intentional insult with intent to provoke a breach of the peace.’ (Malay Mail, 15/8/2019)

Given the nature of this case, this is a matter that could be speedily investigated, and there is no reason, if an offence is believed to be committed, to see the said Zakir Naik being charged in court by next week.

Ministers, MPs and politicians

Ministers, MPs and politicians must always uphold the rule of law and uphold the cause of justice without fear or favour. They should be guided by values and principles, and should not simply take positions to appease the populace for fear of losing popular support amongst certain classes of people.

Therefore, MADPET

–          Calls for Zakir Naik to be investigated, charged and tried in Malaysia if he has broken Malaysian laws before any attempt is made to send him out of Malaysia to ensure justice is done;

–          Calls for the removal of police powers to restrict, gag or vet anyone’s right to freedom of expression and/or opinion, and freedom of assembly;

–          Calls on Malaysia to immediately enact a law on Refugees and Asylum Seekers;
–          Reiterates the call for Malaysia to repeal the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 and all such laws, which allows the police or government authorities to curtail and/or impede our human right to freedom of expression, freedom of opinion and freedom of peaceful assembly;

–           Respect the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, repeal Detention Without Trial laws, and ensure that all in Malaysia have the right to a fair trial.

–          Call on Malaysian Members of Parliaments, Ministers, politicians and government to always act based on principles, values and human rights, and not succumb to taking ‘anti-justice’ positions by reason of fear of losing popular support amongst certain classes of Malaysians.


See full statement at

Zakir Naik should be charged and tried in Malaysia, not deported, if Malaysian laws were broken - Police restriction of Human Rights, including Freedom of Expression is Wrong

No comments: