Saturday, February 21, 2026

24 CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS DEMAND PRIME MINISTER HONOUR REFORM PROMISES AND UPHOLD ORANG ASLI RIGHTS TO LAND

 

 

JOINT PRESS RELEASE: 

24 CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS DEMAND PRIME MINISTER HONOUR REFORM PROMISES AND UPHOLD ORANG ASLI RIGHTS TO LAND


21 February 2026 - We, the undersigned civil society organisations and individuals, are deeply concerned by reports that, within a single month, several Orang Asli communities across Peninsular Malaysia have faced eviction, harassment, police arrests, sudden unannounced developments, and the removal of anti-logging blockades by authorities:


  • In January 2026, it was reported that 51 residents, of 14 families, comprising an Orang Asli settlement in Bukit Bauk Forest Reserve in Dungun, Terengganu were facing eviction from their land by the State Government to make way for a religious education institution. While reports claimed that the community had only resided on the land since 2016, checks have found that the land formed part of the traditional customary land of the Orang Asli who were resettled in Sungai Pergam. The community in question had chosen to return to their ancestral land. They initially made frequent visits, especially during the fruit season. Over time, a few elders chose to stay permanently. The elders were joined by others who chose to return to their customary lands after 2016 when it became difficult for them to eke out a living in the resettlement site.

     

  • On 9 February 2026, 21 Orang Asli villagers from Kampung Jemeri in Rompin, Pahang were detained by the Police following complaints from a company claiming rights to develop land reportedly owned by the Sultan of Pahang who only obtained title to the 781.281 hectares oil palm plantation developed by the Orang Asli smallholders less than month ago, on 26 January 2026. These were customary lands of the Jakun smallholders who had opened their smallholding there 13 years ago. Authorities alleged the villagers trespassed, damaged a barrier, and harvested oil palm fruit, while community representatives maintain that the Orang Asli were defending their ancestral land without having given free, prior, and informed consent to any development.

     

  • On 11 February 2026, a press conference was held at Pusat Kraftangan Orang Asli Pulau Carey to highlight the recent announcement of Westport expansion that had been approved without the Free, Prior and Informed Consent of communities. Lanuza a/l Layun, the leader from Kampung Sungai Kurau said that activities of land reclamation can now be seen from the coasts of his village and they have been denied access to certain areas of their customary territories. Preliminary research by RimbaWatch has identified a proposed oil storage terminal adjacent to the territories of Kampung Sungai Kurau, which poses serious risks of pollution, habitat destruction, and coastal degradation, further threatening the environment and the livelihoods of the Orang Asli.

     

  • On 12 February 2026, anti-logging blockades set up by the Orang Asli at Simpang Cerkep and Bereglag in Pos Simpor, Gua Musang (Kelantan) were torn down. The blockades had been established to protect their forests and ancestral territories. Images and videos shared by the communities show police and uniformed personnel using chainsaws to remove the barriers. The Forestry Department later informed the communities that logging activities by the company would continue. These blockades follow an August 2025 memorandum submitted by the communities of Pos Simpor to protest a 2,000 hectare resort-cum-agriculture development on Gunung Chamah, citing encroachment on customary lands and threats to forests, wildlife, and their way of life. Located within the Central Forest Spine, Gunung Chamah is an environmentally sensitive area known for its rich biodiversity, including the rare Rafflesia su-meiae.


All these cases materialised in the span of just one month. It is clear that these events are not isolated; they reflect deep and systemic marginalisation and exploitation of the Orang Asli by state institutions, private interests, and development policies that prioritise profit over indigenous customary lands, where most of the country’s remaining natural resources are now concentrated.

“We rise not out of incitement, but because our land has been encroached upon, our rights denied, and our dignity trampled,” said Keria bin Peletak, the headman of Kampung Jemeri in a press statement issued by the community.


“If the project continues, we worry that the Nipah leaves that we depend on for our crafts and cultural identity would be extinct,” said Maznah Unyan, the leader of the well-known Tompoq Topoh, the first Mah Meri women-led initiative on the island who had shared their crafts and cultural performances nationally and internationally.


“Many people assume that these issues only affect the Orang Asli, when in fact environmental issues impact everyone and therefore must be addressed collectively. We try to protect the remaining forests, but without support from mainstream society, the mission to save our forests becomes much more difficult. What is even more disheartening is when these efforts are belittled by those who are ‘educated’,” said Dendi, the community leader of Pos Simpor.


Commitment or Empty Promises?

 

Our Prime Minister, Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim said that justice can only be held if Malays, Chinese, Indians and Orang Asli are all [seen] as one team, when he spoke at the closing of the Selangor PKR Convention recently (The Sun, 2026).


In line with this, we wish to remind that the Prime Minister also affirmed the right of the Orang Asli to preserve their customary lands and safeguard their welfare in the 2023 Pakatan Harapan Manifesto, described at the time as “the promises to the people.”

The Malaysia Bar opined that existing Federal powers are adequate to address Orang Asli land issues (Malaysian Bar, 2024). Despite many years of advocacy, including the comprehensive National Inquiry on the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Malaysia in 2013 and many landmark court decisions, substantive recommendations have repeatedly been presented to political leaders. Yet, we remain concerned that these calls continue to fall on deaf ears and risk being ignored once again.


Recommendations

 

In light of the need to protect the rights of Orang Asli through a stronger and more equitable legislative framework, we wish to reiterate the joint demands outlined in the memorandum of recommendations to amend the 1954 Orang Asli Act, developed by a grassroots coalition comprising 15 Orang Asli-based organisations and individuals back in January 2026:

  • Explicit legal recognition of Orang Asli customary land and territories;

  • Implementation of FPIC as genuine consent, not symbolic consultation; and

     

  • Full respect for the right of Orang Asli to self-determination.

     

  • The amendment process of the 1954 Orang Asli Act to be halted until legally binding recognition of Orang Asli customary land and territories is included;

     

  • Full disclosure of the draft bill and consultant’s report to Orang Asli communities;

Lastly, in solidarity with the ongoing struggles of the Orang Asli to defend their rights to their customary lands, we issue this call to the Prime Minister to honour his commitments and deliver on his promises to implement meaningful institutional and legislative reforms:


  • Malaysian Government to uphold its obligations under the 2007 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Under Article 19, the Government must “consult and cooperate in good faith” with the Orang Asli and secure their “free, prior, and informed consent” on all matters that affect them.

     

  • As Chair of the National Land Council, the Prime Minister has a unique responsibility to take immediate action to protect Orang Asli land rights. By doing so, he can fulfil his promises, uphold justice for Indigenous communities, and demonstrate strong, inclusive leadership in safeguarding Malaysia’s cultural and environmental heritage.

     

  • Direct a FULL disclosure of the draft bill and consultant’s report on the Amendments of Orang Asli Act to Orang Asli communities immediately;

     

  • Adopt and implement the recommendations set out in the National Inquiry on the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples by SUHAKAM (Human Rights Commission of Malaysia).

     

  • We urge the Prime Minister to ensure that consultations with Orang Asli communities are meaningful, inclusive, and truly representative, involving women, men, youth, elders, residents of registered villages and kampung serpihan (satellite villages), as well as recognised civil society groups such as Jaringan Orang Asal SeMalaysia (JOAS), Jaringan Kampung Orang Asli SeMalaysia (JKOASM), Center for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC), and the Malaysian Bar. Consultations should also include independent legal, anthropological, and community experts to ensure decisions respect Orang Asli rights and uphold free, prior, and informed consent (e.g. Tony Williams Hunt, Dr. Yogeswaran, Dr. Rusaslina Idrus, Dr. Kamal Solhaimi Fadzil, Dr. Juli Edo, Dr. Suria Angit, and Dr.Izandis.)






Endorsed by the following organisations:


  1. RimbaWatch

  2. Aliran

  3. Alliance Of River Three

  4. Center for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC)

  5. Demokrat Malaya

  6. Gabungan Darurat Iklim Malaysia Berhad

  7. GEGAR (Gerakan Gabungan Anti-Imperialis)

  8. Greenpeace Malaysia

  9. HAYAT

  10. Jaringan Orang Asal SeMalaysia (JOAS)

  11. Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall Civil Rights Committee (KLSCAH-CRC)

  12. MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

  13. Persatuan Promosi Hak Asasi Manusia (PROHAM)

  14. Pertubuhan Suara Anak Sabah

  15. Pertubuhan Wanita Orang Asal Malaysia (PWOAM)

  16. Ruang Lawan Malaysia

  17. Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia [SABM]

  18. SEEDS MALAYSIA

  19. SPARC UTEM

  20. Student Progressive Front UUM

  21. Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)

  22. Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement

  23. TONIBUNG

  24. Yayasan Kajian dan Pembangunan Masyarakat

Endorsed by the following individuals:

  1. Alex Abraham

  2. Farida J. Ibrahim

  3. Jayanath Appudurai

  4. Johnek Henry

  5. Lye Tuck Po

  6. Muhammad Ariff Mohamad Nizam

  7. Nirmala Devi Rasiah

  8. Subhashini Jayanath

  9. TAN WEE HONG (Jacky)

  10. Tan Zhi Ying

  11. Teckwyn Lim

  12. Thulaja Thessa K Vasudhevan

  13. Yap Shon Lee

  14. Koong Hui Yein

     

[BAHASA MALAYSIA]


20 Februari 2026 – Kami, pertubuhan masyarakat sivil dan individu yang menandatangani kenyataan ini, amat prihatin terhadap laporan bahawa dalam tempoh hanya satu bulan, beberapa komuniti Orang Asli di seluruh Semenanjung Malaysia telah berdepan dengan pengusiran, gangguan, penahanan oleh pihak polis, pembangunan secara tiba-tiba tanpa notis, serta pembongkaran sekatan anti-pembalakan oleh pihak berkuasa.


  • Pada Januari 2026, dilaporkan bahawa seramai 51 penduduk daripada 14 keluarga, yang membentuk sebuah penempatan Orang Asli di Hutan Simpan Bukit Bauk di Dungun, Terengganu, berdepan pengusiran oleh Kerajaan Negeri bagi memberi laluan kepada pembinaan sebuah institusi pendidikan agama. Walaupun laporan mendakwa bahawa komuniti tersebut hanya menetap di kawasan berkenaan sejak tahun 2016, semakan mendapati bahawa tanah tersebut merupakan sebahagian daripada tanah adat tradisi Orang Asli yang sebelum ini telah ditempatkan semula di Sungai Pergam. Komuniti berkenaan telah memilih untuk kembali ke tanah nenek moyang mereka. Pada peringkat awal, mereka kerap berulang-alik, terutamanya pada musim buah-buahan. Lama-kelamaan, beberapa orang warga emas memilih untuk menetap secara tetap. Mereka kemudiannya disertai oleh ahli komuniti lain yang kembali ke tanah adat mereka selepas tahun 2016 apabila kehidupan di kawasan penempatan semula menjadi semakin sukar.

     

  • Pada 9 Februari 2026, seramai 21 penduduk Orang Asli dari Kampung Jemeri di Rompin, Pahang telah ditahan oleh pihak polis susulan aduan sebuah syarikat yang mendakwa mempunyai hak untuk membangunkan tanah yang dilaporkan dimiliki oleh Sultan Pahang. Sultan Pahang hanya memperoleh hak milik terhadap ladang kelapa sawit seluas 781.281 hektar yang diusahakan oleh pekebun kecil Orang Asli kurang daripada sebulan sebelumnya, pada 26 Januari 2026. Kawasan tersebut merupakan tanah adat pekebun kecil Jakun yang telah mengusahakan tanah itu sejak 13 tahun lalu. Pihak berkuasa mendakwa penduduk telah menceroboh, merosakkan penghadang, dan menuai buah kelapa sawit, manakala wakil komuniti menegaskan bahawa Orang Asli hanya mempertahankan tanah nenek moyang mereka tanpa sebarang persetujuan bebas, awal dan dimaklumkan diberikan terhadap sebarang pembangunan.

     

  • Pada 11 Februari 2026, satu sidang media telah diadakan di Pusat Kraftangan Orang Asli Pulau Carey bagi menyoroti pengumuman terkini mengenai peluasan Westport yang telah diluluskan tanpa persetujuan bebas, awal dan dimaklumkan daripada komuniti terlibat. Lanuza a/l Layun, ketua Kampung Sungai Kurau, menyatakan bahawa aktiviti penambakan tanah kini dapat dilihat dari pesisir kampungnya dan mereka telah dinafikan akses ke beberapa kawasan dalam wilayah adat mereka. Kajian awal oleh RimbaWatch telah mengenal pasti cadangan pembinaan terminal penyimpanan minyak berhampiran wilayah Kampung Sungai Kurau, yang menimbulkan risiko serius terhadap pencemaran, kemusnahan habitat, dan degradasi pantai, sekali gus mengancam alam sekitar serta mata pencarian Orang Asli.

     

  • Pada 12 Februari 2026, sekatan anti-pembalakan yang didirikan oleh Orang Asli di Simpang Cerkep dan Bereglag di Pos Simpor, Gua Musang (Kelantan) telah dirobohkan. Sekatan tersebut diwujudkan bagi melindungi hutan dan wilayah adat mereka. Gambar dan video yang dikongsi oleh komuniti menunjukkan pihak polis dan anggota beruniform menggunakan gergaji rantai untuk memusnahkan penghadang tersebut. Jabatan Perhutanan kemudiannya memaklumkan bahawa aktiviti pembalakan oleh syarikat akan diteruskan. Sekatan ini dibuat susulan memorandum yang dikemukakan oleh komuniti Pos Simpor pada Ogos 2025 bagi membantah projek pembangunan pusat peranginan dan pertanian seluas 2,000 hektar di Gunung Chamah, yang didakwa menceroboh tanah adat serta mengancam hutan, hidupan liar dan cara hidup mereka. Terletak dalam kawasan Central Forest Spine, Gunung Chamah merupakan kawasan sensitif alam sekitar yang kaya dengan biodiversiti, termasuk spesies Rafflesia su-meiae yang jarang ditemui.


Kesemua insiden ini berlaku dalam tempoh hanya satu bulan. Jelas bahawa peristiwa-peristiwa ini bukan bersifat terpencil, sebaliknya mencerminkan peminggiran dan eksploitasi sistemik terhadap Orang Asli oleh institusi kerajaan, kepentingan swasta, dan dasar pembangunan yang mengutamakan keuntungan berbanding tanah adat masyarakat pribumi, di mana sebahagian besar sumber semula jadi negara kini tertumpu.


“Kami bangkit bukan kerana hasutan, tetapi kerana tanah kami telah diceroboh, hak kami dinafikan, dan maruah kami diinjak-injak,” kata Keria bin Peletak, ketua Kampung Jemeri, dalam satu kenyataan media yang dikeluarkan oleh komuniti tersebut.


“Jika projek ini diteruskan, kami bimbang daun nipah yang menjadi sumber utama kraftangan dan identiti budaya kami akan pupus,” kata Maznah Unyan, pemimpin Tompoq Topoh, inisiatif wanita Mah Meri yang terkenal di pulau tersebut dan telah mempromosikan hasil kraftangan serta persembahan budaya di peringkat nasional dan antarabangsa.


“Ramai yang menganggap isu-isu ini hanya menjejaskan Orang Asli, sedangkan hakikatnya isu alam sekitar memberi kesan kepada semua pihak dan perlu ditangani secara bersama. Kami berusaha melindungi hutan yang masih tinggal, tetapi tanpa sokongan masyarakat arus perdana, usaha ini menjadi amat sukar. Lebih menyedihkan apabila usaha ini diperkecilkan oleh mereka yang dianggap ‘berpendidikan’,” kata Dendi, pemimpin komuniti Pos Simpor.


Komitmen atau Janji Kosong?

Perdana Menteri, Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim, telah menyatakan bahawa keadilan hanya dapat ditegakkan apabila orang Melayu, Cina, India dan Orang Asli dilihat sebagai satu pasukan, dalam ucapannya di penutupan Konvensyen PKR Selangor baru-baru ini (The Sun, 2026).


Seiring dengan kenyataan tersebut, kami ingin mengingatkan bahawa Perdana Menteri juga telah menegaskan hak Orang Asli untuk memelihara tanah adat dan menjaga kebajikan mereka dalam Manifesto Pakatan Harapan 2023, yang pada ketika itu digambarkan sebagai “janji kepada rakyat”.


Majlis Peguam Malaysia berpendapat bahawa kuasa Persekutuan sedia ada adalah mencukupi untuk menangani isu tanah Orang Asli (Malaysian Bar, 2024). Walaupun advokasi telah dilakukan selama bertahun-tahun, termasuk melalui Siasatan Nasional mengenai Hak Tanah Orang Asal pada tahun 2013 dan pelbagai keputusan mahkamah penting, cadangan substantif telah berulang kali dikemukakan kepada pemimpin politik. Namun, kami tetap bimbang bahawa seruan ini terus diabaikan.


Syor-syor dan Tuntutan

Sehubungan dengan keperluan melindungi hak Orang Asli melalui rangka perundangan yang lebih kukuh dan adil, kami mengulangi tuntutan bersama yang terkandung dalam memorandum cadangan pindaan Akta Orang Asli 1954 yang dibangunkan oleh gabungan akar umbi yang terdiri daripada 15 organisasi dan individu Orang Asli pada Januari 2026:

 

  • Pengiktirafan undang-undang secara jelas terhadap tanah dan wilayah adat Orang Asli;

     

  • Pelaksanaan FPIC sebagai persetujuan sebenar, bukan sekadar perundingan simbolik;

     

  • Penghormatan sepenuhnya terhadap hak penentuan kendiri Orang Asli;

     

  • Proses pindaan Akta Orang Asli 1954 dihentikan sehingga pengiktirafan mengikat terhadap tanah adat dimasukkan;

     

  • Pendedahan penuh draf rang undang-undang dan laporan perunding kepada komuniti Orang Asli.

 

Sebagai solidariti terhadap perjuangan berterusan Orang Asli mempertahankan tanah adat mereka, kami menggesa Perdana Menteri untuk menunaikan komitmen dan janji beliau bagi melaksanakan reformasi institusi dan perundangan yang bermakna:

 

  • Kerajaan Malaysia hendaklah mematuhi kewajipannya di bawah Deklarasi Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu mengenai Hak Orang Asal 2007 (UNDRIP), khususnya Artikel 19 yang mewajibkan perundingan dan kerjasama secara ikhlas serta mendapatkan persetujuan bebas, awal dan dimaklumkan;

     

  • Sebagai Pengerusi Majlis Tanah Negara, Perdana Menteri mempunyai tanggungjawab khusus untuk mengambil tindakan segera bagi melindungi hak tanah Orang Asli;

     

  • Mengarahkan pendedahan PENUH rang undang-undang draf dan laporan perunding mengenai Pindaan Akta Orang Asli kepada komuniti Orang Asli;

     

  • Mengguna pakai dan melaksanakan syor yang terkandung dalam Siasatan Nasional mengenai Hak Tanah Orang Asal oleh SUHAKAM;

     

  • Memastikan rundingan dengan komuniti Orang Asli adalah bermakna, inklusif dan benar-benar mewakili semua pihak, termasuk wanita, lelaki, belia, warga emas, penduduk kampung berdaftar dan kampung serpihan, serta organisasi masyarakat sivil yang diiktiraf seperti JOAS, JKOASM, COAC dan Majlis Peguam Malaysia;

     

  • Melibatkan pakar bebas dalam bidang perundangan, antropologi dan komuniti bagi memastikan keputusan menghormati hak Orang Asli dan prinsip FPIC. (contohnya: Tony Williams Hunt, Dr. Yogeswaran, Dr. Rusaslina Idrus, Dr. Kamal Solhaimi Fadzil, Dr. Juli Edo, Dr. Suria Angit, and Dr.Izandis.)




Bibliography


Apa Kata Wanita OA, 2026. Kenyataan dan Pendirian Tok Batin Orang Asli Kampung Jemeri. [online] Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DbDThKl-g5Aogw2HZ5Y1pCvU2A42lHJM/view [Accessed 10 Feb 2026]


Center for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC), 2026. Memorandum: Cadangan Pindaan Akta Orang Asli 1954 (Akta 134) Dari Masyarakat & NGO2 Orang Asli. [online]. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qjY-TnR535JcxQURkuNIE7ojpK-F4fgr/view [Accessedd 11 Feb 2026]


“Malays, Chinese, Indians, Orang Asli – all as one team. Only then can justice be upheld.”

The Sun, 2026. Do not stoke racial, religious sentiments: PM, [online] Available at:

https://thesun.my/news/malaysia-news/do-not-stoke-racial-religious-sentiments-pm/ [Accessed 11 Feb 2026]


Malaysiakini, 2026. Orang Asli groups reject proposed law changes, say talks ‘failed standards’. [online] Available at: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/766434 [Accessed: 9 Feb 2026]


Malaysian Bar, 2024. Ensuring Informed Consent: Protecting Orang Asli Rights in Constitutional Amendments. [online] Available at: https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/article/news/press-statements/press-statements/press-release-ensuring-informed-consent-protecting-orang-asli-rights-in-constitutional-amendments [Accessed: 12 Feb 2026]


Pakatan Harapan, 2023. Manifesto Pakatan Rakyat. [online] Available at: http://lib.perdana.org.my/PLF/Digital_Content/Articles/000006/PRU2013/Manifesto%20Rakyat_Pakatan%20Harapan%20Rakyat.pdf [Accessed: 11 Feb 2026]


SUHAKAM, 2013. Report of the National Inquiry into the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples. [online] Available at:
https://suhakam.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/NI.pdf [Accessed 13 Feb 2026]


About RimbaWatch


RimbaWatch is a regional, independent watchdog conducting research and analysis on climate-related issues.


For further details on proposed deforestation, see our Forest Tracker at rimbawatchmy.com.


For media enquiries, please contact:


RimbaWatch (Kuala Lumpur)

admin@rimbawatch.com

rimbawatchmy.com

Protect Orang Asli rights to land, 24 groups urge govt

Civil society groups want the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954, currently under review, to include legal recognition of Orang Asli customary land and territories.

orang asli
Recent cases reflect the systemic marginalisation of the Orang Asli, according to the 24 civil society groups.
PETALING JAYA:
Twenty-four civil society groups have urged the government to protect the rights of the Orang Asli to customary land in light of recent arrests for alleged trespass and the alleged imminent eviction of several families.

The groups said there was also a port expansion in Selangor that was approved without the consent of local Orang Asli communities, who now claim to have been denied access to their customary areas.

They said these cases surfaced in just a month and reflected systemic marginalisation of the Orang Asli, with profit prioritised over indigenous customary land.

“The Malaysian Bar opines that existing federal powers are adequate to address Orang Asli land issues. After many years of advocacy and many landmark court decisions, substantive recommendations have repeatedly been presented to political leaders.

“Yet, we remain concerned that these calls continue to fall on deaf ears and risk being ignored once again,” they said in a statement.

The groups urged Putrajaya to give explicit legal recognition to Orang Asli customary land and territories, and fully respect the Orang Asli’s right to self-determination.

They also called for the ongoing review of the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 to be put on hold until it contains legally binding recognition of Orang Asli customary land and territories.

The groups urged the government to disclose the draft amendment bill to the Orang Asli communities to obtain their agreement.

“As chair of the National Land Council, the prime minister has a unique responsibility to take immediate action to protect Orang Asli land rights.

“By doing so, he can fulfil his promises, uphold justice for indigenous communities, and demonstrate strong, inclusive leadership in safeguarding Malaysia’s cultural and environmental heritage.

“We urge the prime minister to ensure that consultations with Orang Asli communities are meaningful, inclusive, and truly representative,” they said.

The joint statement was signed by RimbaWatch, Aliran, the Center for Orang Asli Concerns, Greenpeace Malaysia, and the Society for the Promotion of Human Rights (Proham), among others.

Last month, Bernama reported that 51 Orang Asli folk at the Bukit Bauk forest reserve in Dungun, Terengganu faced eviction from Terengganu government land they have occupied since 2016.

Earlier this month, police arrested 21 Orang Asli in Rompin for allegedly trespassing on land owned by the Pahang sultan. - FMT, 21/2/2026

 

Tuesday, December 09, 2025

Abolish VETO power to enable the United Nations to be able to be an effective defender of human rights, with the power to end human rights violations(15 Groups)

 


Media Statement – 10/12/2025(World Human Rights Day)

Abolish VETO power to enable the United Nations to be able to be an effective defender of human rights, with the power to end human rights violations

On this World Human Rights Day (10 December) we, the 15 undersigned groups, organizations and trade unions express our greatest disappointment that the United Nations that was expected to defend and promote human rights have failed in its objects, and the expectations of the peoples of the world.

It is still possible to rectify this dilemma, if and only if the member states of the United Nations are committed to abolish the VETO power that is now with the 5 Permanent member States – Russia, China, France, United States of America and the United Kingdom, so that it can no longer impede the UN from defending and promoting human rights, and ensuring justice be done.

VETO violates principle of sovereign equality

The UN Charter, in Article 2(1) states, ‘The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its members.’ This fundamental principle of EQUALITY is violated if the United Nations continue to allow a class of ‘super members’, who can use their VETO power to prevent actions advocated by even the majority of UN member States.

VETO prevents UN from ending human rights violations

The preamble of the UN Charter clearly states the obligation of the UN is ‘to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small,’. Thus, the UN acts for human rights, not just when States commit extra-territorial human rights violations but also human rights violations within the jurisdiction of respective States, regardless they are UN members or not. Thus, the UN protects human rights of ALL human persons, and not just rights of member States.

Through the various UN processes, including the UPR process, the UN and UN member States has called on member States to move away from injustices and human rights violations, and calls on States and others to enact rights protecting laws, and abolish laws, practices and even policies that are in violation of human rights. As such, the UN has worked to promote, amongst others, women rights, indigenous rights, environmental rights and the rights of human rights defenders. It has opposed ethnic cleansing, genocide, forced labour

However, the United Nations have been prevented from doing the needful, by reason of abuse of power of some of the permanent 5 by the use of the VETO – that has effectively prevented UN from fulfilling its intended duties to human rights, especially when the perpetrator and collaborators of rights violation, are ‘friends’ of VETO power holding States, or the said VETO power holding States themselves.

The will of the majority of UN member States in issues of human rights can thus be IGNORED or prevented by the use of the VETO. Of late, this has happened in several countries including Palestine, Myanmar and Ukraine.

The VETO has been used to block UN actions. “Instead of being a vehicle for action, the Security Council has too often become an instrument of deadlock. “We see the consequences in places like Gaza, in the persecution of the Rohingya, and in the war in Ukraine,” he [Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim] said in his keynote address at the Common Action Forum (CAF) 2024.

The abolition of the VETO power will restore true sovereign equality in the United Nations, and will allow the UN to be a more effective tool to act against violation of human rights and injustices.

If perpetrators do not heed the call of the UN to stop human rights violations and restore justice, the UN can then take further actions in the form imposition of sanctions, and even cause the United Nation’s forces to enter into the area of rights violations, to not just protect victims, but to also cause perpetrators to do the needful to restore justice including the return of people back to their land and property, and to ensure justice be done.

VETO power CAN be ABOLISHED …

The VETO power can be abolished, whereby the UN Charter, amongst others, in Article 108 states that ‘Amendments to the present Charter shall come into force for all Members of the United Nations when they have been adopted by a vote of two thirds of the members of the General Assembly and ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations, including all the permanent members of the Security Council.’

The VETO power can thus be abolished, if two-thirds of the UN Member States support the move, and the 5 existing Permanent Members with VETO power agrees to it. If any one of the VETO power-holding member State objects, it cannot be done. We hope that no member State will oppose this move to abolish the VETO power.

Therefore, we call of all members of the UN Member States to vote in favor of abolishing the VETO power, and all call on all the VETO power holding States to also support this initiative.

We call on all UN Member States to vote without fear or favour to remove this often abused VETO power, that has made the UN a ‘toothless tiger’ unable to act definitely to defend human rights and restore justice even when an overwhelming majority of UN member States wants the UN  to act;

We also call on all the 5 Permanent Members, being Russia, China, France, United States of America and the UK, to agree to the removal of the VETO powers to restore democracy and sovereign equality within the UN, so that the UN can regain its power to act in the interest of human rights, and

We call all the 5 Permanent Members, being Russia, China, France, United States of America and the UK to adopt a MORATORIUM in using their VETO powers pending the abolition of VETO.

Charles Hector

Koong Hui Yein

 

For and on behalf the 15 organizations/groups/trade unions listed below

 

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement, Malaysia

Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), India

COAC (Center for Orang Asli Concerns), Malaysia

Global Women’s Strike, UK

Global Women’s Strike, US

Legal Action for Women, UK

North South Initiative (NSI), Malaysia

Payday Men’s Network, UK-US

Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), India

Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU), Malaysia

Second Chance Redemption, Pakistan

WH4C (Workers Hub for Change)

Women of Colour Global Women’s Strike, UK

Women of Color Global Women’s Strike, US

PM Anwar calls for ban on UNSC veto power in mass atrocities cases, wants global justice reform

United Nations Security Council (UNSC) veto power should be banned in cases of mass atrocities until it can be abolished, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. — Bernama pic
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) veto power should be banned in cases of mass atrocities until it can be abolished, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 2 — United Nations Security Council (UNSC) veto power should be banned in cases of mass atrocities until it can be abolished, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

He said the UNSC decision-making processes require broader support from both permanent and non-permanent members and be subject to ratification by the General Assembly through a simple majority.

Anwar said the veto power has paralysed the council, while the lack of representation from regions such as Africa and Latin America reflects a bygone era.

“Instead of being a vehicle for action, the Security Council has too often become an instrument of deadlock.

“We see the consequences in places like Gaza, in the persecution of the Rohingya, and in the war in Ukraine,” he said in his keynote address at the Common Action Forum (CAF) 2024, here today.

The Prime Minister said the world stands at a critical juncture for global justice, emphasising that Israel’s actions against Palestinians undermine the very foundations of the global order.

“... war crimes, collective punishment, and genocide are a blatant affront to the norms of international law and fundamental human rights,” he said.

As Malaysia has advocated at the UN, Anwar said the world must take bold, immediate steps, starting with an arms embargo on Israel.

However, he said the severity of Israel’s actions warrants more including a global consensus towards suspending or even expelling Israel from the UN.

The UNSC reform is one of the key areas proposed by Anwar that urgently needs to be reformed for a more equitable world.

Other areas are the international financial architecture, international trading system, climate finance and climate justice.

At the UNSC Debate in New York in September, Malaysia made a strong appeal to limit the use of veto power in the UNSC, stressing that the unchecked use of veto has obstructed peace efforts, particularly in the case of Palestine. — Bernama

Malaysia urges UN to curb or abolish veto power

Foreign minister Mohamad Hasan says the UN Security Council must be freed from this humiliating paralysis.

mohamad hasan
Foreign minister Mohamad Hasan said the general assembly should be allowed to serve as the conscience and voice of the world, unimpeded. (Bernama pic)
PETALING JAYA:
The survival of the United Nations hinges on some urgent reforms, especially on the veto power held by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council.

In addressing the 80th session of the UN general assembly (UNGA) 2025 in New York yesterday, Malaysian foreign minister Mohamad Hasan said there was a need to limit, if not abolish, the veto power, Bernama reported.

“We must challenge it each and every time that it is wielded, particularly in cases of crimes against humanity.

“Authority must flow back to the general assembly. As the most inclusive body of this house, it should be allowed to serve as the conscience and voice of the world, unimpeded,” he was quoted as saying.

Mohamad urged the organisation to continue to demand accountability from the permanent members of the UN Security Council, referring to the United States, Russia, China, France and the United Kingdom.

“We must pursue results through Resolution 377A: Uniting for Peace. No more shall we quietly accept the dismissal of our collective voice.

“We must question and challenge the veto. We must free the UN Security Council from this humiliating paralysis,” he said.

He added that the UN must remain a relevant and effective international organisation and a global guardian of peace.

On the issue of Israel and its recent actions, Mohamad called for the UN to impose sanctions on Israel, stressing that the metastasis of Zionist regime brutality in the Middle East must not be allowed to continue.

He said Israel’s latest assault on Doha, Qatar, was not merely an attack on a few Hamas representatives but a violation of another state’s sovereignty and an insult to all mediation efforts.

Mohamad added that the strike signalled that Israel’s violence would continue to destabilise the region.

“The atrocities may have begun with Palestine, but they certainly will not end with Palestine. As the Middle East grows ever more dangerous for its residents, we will feel the reverberations all over the world.

“This is why simply advocating for a two-state solution is not enough,” he said, according to Bernama.

He also reiterated Malaysia’s commitment to support the Palestinian people through any measure, including the New York Declaration.

Mohamad said concrete action must also be taken against the occupying force, while long-term support should be prepared to ensure the development of a self-governing Palestinian state.

“The test that we now face is an existential one. After 80 years of the UN, and 77 years of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, if we cannot resolve this, the citizens of the world will lose faith in us and in the international order,” he said. - FMT, 28/9/2025

 

Slovenian president reiterates end to UN Security Council veto power

Slovenian President Dr Natasa Pirc Musar at HBKU yesterday. PICTURE: Thajudheen.
Slovenian President Dr Natasa Pirc Musar at HBKU yesterday. PICTURE: Thajudheen.
 
Slovenian President Dr NataÅ¡a Pirc Musar has reiterated her call to abolish the United Nations (UN) Security Council’s absolute veto power, arguing that the privilege 'corrupts absolutely' and has left the UN in a 'big struggle' to uphold its mission of global peace and security.

“When you do have something absolute, it is always a problem,” she said. “You know what the saying is?, ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. It is so true, also in politics,” Pirc Musar said in her lecture, titled “The Realities of Multipolarism vs the Need for Multilateralism”.

She was speaking at Hamad Bin Khalifa University’s Minaretein Auditorium Monday, addressing global governance, artificial intelligence, and gender equity. The event forms part of her official visit to Qatar and reflected HBKU’s ongoing efforts to foster international dialogue on diplomacy and leadership.

Elected in 2022 as Slovenia’s first woman head of state, Pirc Musar used the platform to make an appeal for UN reform, particularly targeting what she described as the “hybrid war” within the Security Council, where five permanent members – the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China – hold veto powers.

The Slovenian president noted that while France and the United Kingdom have refrained from using the veto since 1986, other permanent members continue to use, and in some cases, abuse the power, stalling collective action in times of global crisis. “For 25 years we have been discussing UN reform. For 25 years we didn’t make any steps,” she added.

Pirc Musar outlined three proposals to curb the Security Council’s unchecked authority: Restricting voting rights of countries under discussion in the Council; banning the use of vetoes in cases involving mass atrocities, crimes against humanity, or genocide; and subjecting veto decisions to review by the UN General Assembly, where a two-thirds majority could overrule or confirm them.

The Slovenian president cited her September address at the UN General Assembly, where Slovenia urged the body to seek an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the legality and limits of the veto power in cases of humanitarian crises. “Now is the time to discuss this really very important topic,” she said, adding that “we don’t have another 25 years to waste.”

Pirc Musar also touched on the interconnectedness of global issues, from wars in Ukraine, Palestine, and Sudan to the ethical implications of artificial intelligence: “Everything is interconnected,” she stressed, adding that knowledge-sharing and cultural dialogue are vital to overcoming political egoism and sustaining multilateral co-operation.

“Knowledge is to be shared and not a single country on this planet has all the knowledge it needs,” she said. “If you only stick to your own country and are not willing to share, that is egoistic.”

Pirc Musar also tackled the theme of gender equity, linking it to the broader struggle for fairness and inclusion in global governance.

Echoing her faith in multilateralism, she described the UN as “the only multilateral body covering the whole planet,” insisting that it “should be the diamond of international politics.” - Arab Times, 10/11/2025

Finland's president wants end of single state veto at UN Security Council

By Anne Kauranen
 
HELSINKI, Sept 18 (Reuters) - Finland's President Alexander Stubb has called for expansion of the U.N. Security Council, abolition of its single state veto power, and suspension of any member engaging in an "illegal war" such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine. .. Reuters, 18/9/2024
 

India to UN: Abolish Security Council veto powers or give them to new permanent members

Pressing its case for a reform of the United Nations Security Council, India has called for an equal voice for all nations—or at least, for permanent members.

Pratik Mathur, a counsellor at India's United Nations Mission addresses the General Assembly on Wednesday, April 26, 2023, on the use of veto powers by permanent members of the Security Council. (Photo courtesy the UN).

Pressing its case for reforming the UN Security Council, India has said that either the veto rights should be abolished or be given also to new permanent members in a reformed Council.

"Either all nations are treated equally in the context of voting rights or else the new permanent members must also be given the veto," Pratik Mathur, a counsellor at India's UN Mission said on Wednesday at the General Assembly.

"Extension of veto to new members, in our view, will have no adverse impact on the effectiveness of an enlarged Council," he said, countering arguments made by some countries against expanding permanent membership.

He said that the question of veto should be addressed as part of a comprehensive reform of the Council through clearly defined timelines in the Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) for reforms.

The IGN has virtually stalled because a small group of countries have manipulated the process to prevent progress, observers believe.

Mathur was speaking at an Assembly debate held on the first anniversary of the landmark resolution requiring a discussion by the Assembly within 10 days of a veto being cast in the Council.

While the Assembly cannot override a veto in the Council, by having a discussion, it hopes to bring moral pressure to bear on the vetoing countries or hold them accountable to the rest of the world.

Mathur said that the veto resolution adopted by consensus "unfortunately, reflected a piecemeal approach to UNSC reform, thereby highlighting one aspect, ignoring [the] root cause of the problem".

The root cause—in the view of India and many countries—is the architecture of the Council that reflects the post-World War II scenario and gives veto-wielding permanent seats to the five victorious Allies (Britain, China, France, the US and now Russia, which holds the seat originally given to the Soviet Union).

Mathur said, "As rightly called out by our African brothers, it goes against the concept of [the] sovereign equality of states and only perpetuates the mindset of World War II: 'To the victor belongs the spoils'.


"Let me flag what our African brothers have repeatedly stated in the IGN: The veto as a matter of principle should be abolished. However, as a matter of common justice, it should be extended to new permanent members so long as it continues to exist."

During the debate, Kenya's deputy permanent representative Michael Kiboino reaffirmed the same point, citing the Common African Position on the Security Council reform.

"If the pursuit of the purposes of the UN Charter is based on the principle of sovereign equality of states, then the veto is a contradiction that should be abolished.

"But if it is to be retained in a reformed Security Council, it must be extended to new permanent members with all its attributes, including the prerogatives and privileges of permanent membership," Kiboino declared.

The most vigorous push for Council reform comes from the 54 nations of Africa, a continent without any permanent members on the Council although the majority of its actions relate to it.

South Africa's permanent representative, Mathu Joyini, said that the Assembly's veto resolution requiring discussions of it "should not be seen as an interim or ad-hoc solution to the need for urgent Security Council reform, which will address the structural challenges within the Council itself".

"We must continue our efforts for urgent Council reform and the revitalisation of the General Assembly. Ultimately, focus should be on giving greater momentum to the reform of the Security Council itself," she added.

The Assembly's resolution in April 2022—on holding debates on vetoes—was adopted after the Council was paralysed by Russia's veto of a resolution in February last year, condemning its invasion of Ukraine.

Russia vetoed another resolution in September condemning its referendums in areas of Ukraine it had annexed.

Last year, Moscow also vetoed a resolution on border crossings for sending aid to rebel-held areas of Syria, and joined China to shoot down a resolution condemning North Korea's intercontinental and other ballistic missile tests.

The Assembly held debates on those three vetoes.

Assembly President Csaba Korosi called the veto resolution "a breakthrough, a gamechanger" that "opened the door for a new form of collaboration and accountability" between the Assembly and the Security Council.

While India has insisted on veto rights for all permanent members in a reformed Council, it had also offered to forgo the veto power temporarily as a compromise.

During an IGN meeting in 2016, Syed Akbaruddin, who was then India's permanent representative, said, "Our own national position has been and remains that the veto should, as long as it exists, be extended to new permanent members. As a measure of flexibility and willingness for compromise, the use of the veto can be deferred till the Review Conference."

The UN Charter provides for a conference to review and amend the veto rights, but such a meeting has never taken place. - National Herald, 29/4/2023

 

China, Russia Again Veto UN Statement on Myanmar Conflict - The Diplomat