Monday, July 17, 2023

Possible Enforced Disappearance of Myanmar HRD Thuzar Maung and her family in Malaysia on 4/7/2023 - Speedy Transparent Investigation needed (MADPET)

 

Media Statement – 18/7/2023

Speedy Transparent Investigation needed in Possible Enforced Disappearance of Myanmar HRD Thuzar Maung and her family in Malaysia on 4/7/2023

MADPET (Malaysian Against Death Penalty and Torture) is concerned about Malaysia’s and the Malaysian police’s diligence in investigating the incident of 4/7/2023 when Human Rights Defender Thuzar Maung(46), her husband, Saw Than Tin Win(43),  her daughter, Poeh Khing Maung(16); and sons Aung Myint Maung(21) and Thukha Maung(17) was possibly enforced disappeared from their home in Kuala Lumpur.  If the Malaysian authorities fail ‘…to investigate the case ‘diligently and seriously’ (and) had hampered the progress (of the investigation)…’, it may be evidence of enforced disappearance.

It was reported that all 5 are UNHCR recognised refugees, and have been in Malaysia since 2015 when they fled from Myanmar, to escape persecution and growing violence against Muslims.

Thuzar Maung, also spelled Thu Zar Moung, is an outspoken supporter of Myanmar’s pro-democracy movement. She is, amongst others, also the chair of the Myanmar Muslim Refugee Community and Myanmar Migrant Workers Committee.

According to a Human Rights Watch(HRW) statement

‘….On July 4, 2023, unidentified men abducted Thuzar Maung, 46; her husband, Saw Than Tin Win, 43; her daughter, Poeh Khing Maung, 16; and sons Aung Myint Maung, 21, and Thukha Maung, 17, from their residence in Ampang Jaya, Kuala Lumpur, based on reports from witnesses and CCTV footage. Thuzar Maung, also spelled Thu Zar Moung, is an outspoken supporter of Myanmar’s pro-democracy movement…

….At about 4:30 p.m. on July 4, a car entered the gated community where the family lives. The driver told the security guards they were police. Two hours later, Thuzar Maung was on the phone with a friend, who heard her yell to her husband that unknown men were entering the house, before being disconnected. At about 7:10 p.m., the same car and the two cars owned by Thuzar Maung’s family were seen leaving the compound. Thuzar Maung’s phone and the phones of her husband and children appear to have been immediately turned off, as no calls have gone through since….

CCTV footage at the guard booth captured the license plate of the “police” car, which Malaysian police have since identified as fake. The footage also captured a black-gloved hand of the driver of one of Thuzar Maung’s cars holding out the gate card to exit the compound. Vehicle logs show that the same car had entered the gated community on June 19. Thuzar Maung’s colleagues who entered the house on July 5 said there were no signs of robbery…’

Enforced Disappearance, Kidnapping or other crimes?

This may be a case of ENFORCED DISSAPEARANCE, whereby it the disappearance was done by agents of the State (like the police,etc) or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the State. HRW, in their statement, said that the driver of the car that was used told the security guards that they were police. The perpetrators could also be ‘agents’ of Myanmar, acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence Malaysia.

Alternatively, it could be kidnapping or abduction by criminals.

Hence, MADPET is of concern that the Malaysian police is only taking this case as a missing persons case. "The investigation has been opened under the Missing Persons' KEP," he [Selangor police chief Comm Datuk Hussein Omar Khan] said when contacted on Monday (July 17) – Star/17/7/2023.

Based on the allegations in the HRW Statement, it is more than a missing persons case, but may include kidnapping and even the crime of impersonating the police.

As it involves refugees from Myanmar, it’s of not just of national but international concern. Investigation must also proof that Malaysia is not involved directly or indirectly, and there has been no violation of the principle of non-refoulement. The 5 must be found speedily.

Enforced Disappearance - Raymond Koh, Amri Che Mat, Joshua Hilmy and Ruth Sitepu still missing

MADPET notes sadly that Malaysia to date has still not managed to find Pastor Raymond Koh, Amri Che Mat, Joshua Hilmy and Ruth Sitepu, all victims of enforced disappearance according to the findings of SUHAKAM(Malaysian Human Rights Commission).

In the case of Pastor Raymond Koh and  Amri Che Mat, SUHAKAM(Malaysian Human Rights Commission) after an inquiry concluded was an enforced disappearance and that the police were behind it. ‘…Commissioner Datuk Mah Weng Kwai[a former Judge] said its decision was based on the findings of its panel that had been looking into Koh’s abduction, which took place on February 13, 2017. “The direct and circumstantial evidence in Pastor Raymond Koh’s case proves, on a balance of probabilities, that he was abducted by State agents namely, the Special Branch, Bukit Aman, Kuala Lumpur…’ (Malay Mail, 3/4/2019)

In the case of the enforced disappearance of Joshua Hilmy and Ruth Sitepu, last seen in November 2016, SUHAKAM after the inquiry ‘said it did not find evidence that the that the pastor and his wife were abducted by “agents of the state”. Suhakam commissioner Mohd Hishamudin Yunus[a former Judge], who chaired the inquiry, said their disappearance was carried out by “a person or more than a person unknown with acquiescence of the authorities”.“Their involuntary disappearance breached the laws of Malaysia,” …“However, (although) we did not find evidence that they were abducted by agents of the state, yet the authorities failed to investigate the case ‘diligently and seriously’ (and) had hampered the progress (of the investigation),” (FMT, 15/4/2022).

All 4 remains missing to date.

Official Secrets Act – Hiding of Truth? Abolish it in favour of Transparency.

Following SUHAKAM’s finding of enforced disappearance of Pastor Koh and Amri Che Mat, sadly the government’s response was not to commence investigation and prosecution, but to set up a task force to investigate SUHAKAM’s conclusions. It was given six months to complete its report. Then the Task Force report was classified secret under the Official Secrets Act, and remains classified to date. Why? What is the government hiding?

On 9/5/2023, Justice Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh, ordered that the report - which was classified under the Official Secrets Act (OSA) 1972 - should be released to Amri’s wife and her lawyer, prohibiting them from disclosing the report to any members of the public.  

Why was the government wanting to keep it secret? "A general assertion that the report, if disclosed, would allow criminals and enemies of the state to take advantage of the police operation is insufficient," he[Justice Wan Ahmad Farid] said in the online proceedings here on Tuesday (May 9)…’ (Star, 9/5/2023)

MADPET notes sadly, that the State has now appealed this High Court Order, and have also obtained an order staying the release of the report pending the disposal of appeal. (FMT, 7/6/2023)

MADPET calls for a speedy, comprehensive and transparent investigation into the possible enforced disappearance of Thuzar Maung, Saw Than Tin Win, Poeh Khing Maung, Aung Myint Maung and Thukha Maung. There should be ‘no secrets’ or use of the OSA to hide the revelation of truth or to protect agents of the State, or the State itself.

MADPET calls for disclosure on the stage of investigation in the enforced disappearance Pastor Raymond Koh, Amri Che Mat, Joshua Hilmy and Ruth Sitepu, Will there be any prosecution? Are there other facts of the case that are being kept secret using the OSA  for reasons like to not  ‘allow criminals and enemies of the state to take advantage of the police operation..’?

MADPET calls for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Harapan-led government that promised reforms, to immediately repeal the Official Secrets Act (OSA) 1972 and end the government culture of ‘secrecy’ in favour of transparency and accountability.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

Malaysia: Myanmar Refugee Activist Abducted

Urgently Locate, Ensure Safety of Thuzar Maung, Family Members

The Myanmar refugee activist Thuzar Maung with her husband, Saw Than Tin Win, who were abducted along with her three children from their home in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on July 4, 2023he Myanmar refugee activist Thuzar Maung with her husband, Saw Than Tin Win, who were abducted along with her three children from their home in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on July 4, 2023. © 2023 private

(Bangkok) – The Malaysian government should immediately prioritize a thorough and transparent investigation into the abduction of the Myanmar refugee activist Thuzar Maung and her family, Human Rights Watch said today.

On July 4, 2023, unidentified men abducted Thuzar Maung, 46; her husband, Saw Than Tin Win, 43; her daughter, Poeh Khing Maung, 16; and sons Aung Myint Maung, 21, and Thukha Maung, 17, from their residence in Ampang Jaya, Kuala Lumpur, based on reports from witnesses and CCTV footage. Thuzar Maung, also spelled Thu Zar Moung, is an outspoken supporter of Myanmar’s pro-democracy movement.

“We fear that Thuzar Maung and her family were abducted in a planned operation and are at grave risk,” said Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The Malaysian government should urgently act to locate the family and ensure their safety.”

At about 4:30 p.m. on July 4, a car entered the gated community where the family lives. The driver told the security guards they were police. Two hours later, Thuzar Maung was on the phone with a friend, who heard her yell to her husband that unknown men were entering the house, before being disconnected. At about 7:10 p.m., the same car and the two cars owned by Thuzar Maung’s family were seen leaving the compound. Thuzar Maung’s phone and the phones of her husband and children appear to have been immediately turned off, as no calls have gone through since.

CCTV footage at the guard booth captured the license plate of the “police” car, which Malaysian police have since identified as fake. The footage also captured a black-gloved hand of the driver of one of Thuzar Maung’s cars holding out the gate card to exit the compound. Vehicle logs show that the same car had entered the gated community on June 19. Thuzar Maung’s colleagues who entered the house on July 5 said there were no signs of robbery.

Thuzar Maung is a long-time advocate for democracy in Myanmar and refugee and migrant rights in Malaysia. She serves as chair of the Myanmar Muslim Refugee Community and Myanmar Migrant Workers Committee and has worked closely with Myanmar’s opposition National Unity Government. She has over 93,000 followers on Facebook, where she posts criticism of abuses by Myanmar’s junta, which took power after a February 1, 2021 military coup. Her friends and colleagues expressed concern that she was targeted for her activism. The police in Kuala Lumpur have opened an investigation into the case.

Thuzar Maung fled Myanmar for Malaysia in 2015 to escape growing violence against Muslims. All five family members are recognized by the United Nations Refugee Agency as refugees in Malaysia.

“Foreign governments should press Malaysian authorities to quickly uncover the location of this family,” Pearson said. “Myanmar activists are apparently at risk even when they criticize the military junta from a country where they have sought asylum.” - Human Rights Watch



Cops investigating alleged abduction of Myanmar activist and family
 
By FARIK ZOLKEPLI Nation

Monday, 17 Jul 2023 6:19 PM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR: The police have opened a Missing Persons' Police Inquiry Paper (KEP) over the alleged abduction of a Myanmar activist and her family in Ampang Jaya.

Selangor police chief Comm Datuk Hussein Omar Khan said the police have received a report on the matter.

"The investigation has been opened under the Missing Persons' KEP," he said when contacted on Monday (July 17).

The Human Rights Watch (HRW) had called on the Malaysian government to investigate the abduction of Myanmar refugee activist Thuzar Maung and her family.

The HRW claimed that on July 4, unidentified men abducted Thuzar Maung, 46; her husband, Saw Than Tin Win, 43; her daughter, Poeh Khing Maung, 16; and sons Aung Myint Maung, 21; and Thukha Maung, 17; from their residence in Ampang Jaya based on reports from witnesses and CCTV footage. - Star, 17/7/2023

Special Branch behind pastor Raymond Koh’s disappearance, says Suhakam

Susanna Liew and Norhayati Mohd Arifin attend the announcement of Suhakamu00e2u20acu2122s public inquiry findings into the disappearances of pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat in Kuala Lumpur April 3, 2019. u00e2u20acu201d Picture by Hari Anggara
Susanna Liew and Norhayati Mohd Arifin attend the announcement of Suhakam’s public inquiry findings into the disappearances of pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat in Kuala Lumpur April 3, 2019. — Picture by Hari Anggara

KUALA LUMPUR, April 3 — After an extensive public inquiry, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) announced today that the Special Branch, the special police intelligence team from Bukit Aman, was involved in the abduction of pastor Raymond Koh, similar to that of activist Amri Che Mat.

Commissioner Datuk Mah Weng Kwai said its decision was based on the findings of its panel that had been looking into Koh’s abduction, which took place on February 13, 2017.

"The direct and circumstantial evidence in Pastor Raymond Koh’s case proves, on a balance of probabilities, that he was abducted by State agents namely, the Special Branch, Bukit Aman, Kuala Lumpur.

“The Panel further finds that there is no evidence to support the contention, as suggested by Counsel on behalf of Pastor Raymond Koh’s family and Counsel for the Bar Council, Pastor Raymond Koh was abducted by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorisation, support or acquiescence of the State,” Mah said.

Mah said the conclusion was reached based on testimony from Amri’s wife, Norhayati Mohd Ariffin, who said she was told by Special Branch officer Mohd Shamzaini Mohd Daud that the enforced disappearances of both Koh and Amri were carried out by Bukit Aman’s Special Branch.

Suhakam commissioner, Datuk Mah Weng Kwai, announces the findings of Suhakam’s public inquiry into the disappearances of pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat in Kuala Lumpur April 3, 2019. — Picture by Hari Anggara
Suhakam commissioner, Datuk Mah Weng Kwai, announces the findings of Suhakam’s public inquiry into the disappearances of pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat in Kuala Lumpur April 3, 2019. — Picture by Hari Anggara

He said the conclusion also drew from the police’s refusal to acknowledge this and reclassify Koh’s case from abduction to enforced disappearance.

Based on the findings, the inquiry panel made several recommendations including the formation of a special task force to re-investigate Koh’s disappearance, the separation of powers between the police and religious authorities, and reforming the police’s standard operating procedures (SOP).

“Every effort must be made to track down the abductors of pastor Raymond Koh in a thorough police investigation,” said Mah, adding that an experienced investigating officer should be appointed for the case.

He added that the families must be given closure.

Inquiries into the disappearances of Koh, Amri, and two others missing — pastor Joshua Hilmi and his wife, Ruth Hilmi — were held under the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act.

The inquiry on Koh’s case took place over 21 days and heard 16 witnesses, and ended last December 8.

Koh, whose real name is Keng Joo Koh, 64, was last seen by his wife Susanna Liew Sow Yoke in February 2017 in Petaling Jaya less than three months after Amri’s abduction.

Joshua and Ruth have also been missing since 2016. - Malay Mail, 3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No evidence couple abducted by ‘state agents’, says Suhakam inquiry

Public hearing confirms, however, that pastor Joshua Hilmy and his wife Ruth Sitepu are ‘victims of enforced disappearance’.

KUALA LUMPUR: The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia’s (Suhakam) public inquiry into missing couple Joshua Hilmy and Ruth Sitepu has held that they are victims of enforced disappearance.

However, it said it did not find evidence that the pastor and his wife were abducted by “agents of the state”.

Suhakam commissioner Mohd Hishamudin Yunus, who chaired the inquiry, said their disappearance was carried out by “a person or more than a person unknown with acquiescence of the authorities”.

“Their involuntary disappearance breached the laws of Malaysia,” the former judge said when delivering the inquiry’s decision today.

“However, (although) we did not find evidence that they were abducted by agents of the state, yet the authorities failed to investigate the case ‘diligently and seriously’ (and) had hampered the progress (of the investigation),” he said.

Joshua, a Malay who converted to Christianity, and his Indonesian wife Ruth were last seen on Nov 30, 2016 at their Petaling Jaya home.

Hishamudin pointed out that police had failed to prioritise missing persons’ cases like Joshua and Ruth’s, and did not look into the couple’s case thoroughly.

“The IO (investigating officer) testified that Joshua had been investigated for sedition for insulting Prophet Muhammad on Facebook in 2014. Groups such as Perkasa had lodged reports against him.

“We note that there were no efforts by the IO to revisit the Facebook post, which we find strange as the police should have investigated it to find any leads that might be useful in the couple’s disappearance.

“Even though some pertinent information was found during the early stage, it was not taken seriously by police and no danger alert was triggered.

“We are of the view that the lack of interest and seriousness by police in appreciating the severity of the case, treating it as a normal missing persons case, reflects the failure of the police to prioritise the case,” he said.

Hishamudin also criticised the police’s lack of speed in commencing the investigation.

“The couple’s friend Peter Pormannan lodged a report at the Klang police station in March 2017 after he couldn’t find them.

“The IO only recorded Peter’s statement one month later. As a responsible IO, it is crucial for him to act immediately at the early stage to gather as much information as possible,” he said.

The panel also found that police tried to “suppress” Joshua and Ruth’s case from the Indonesian embassy.

“According to Ruth’s brother Imam Sitepu’s testimony, he said the IO told him not to report Ruth’s disappearance to the embassy.

“We are of the view that the IO tried to suppress this case from the knowledge of other agencies and the public,” Hishamudin added.

He also said police never updated Ruth’s family on the status of the investigation, as required under the Criminal Procedure Code.

“Although Iman did not make a specific request, it is incumbent on the police to inform the family of the progress,” Hishamudin said.

Fellow commissioners Jerald Joseph and Madeline Berma assisted Hishamudin in the inquiry, which was held from Feb 10, 2020 to Jan 22 this year. A total of 26 witnesses assisted the inquiry. - FMT, 15/4/2022



High Court orders limited disclosure of task force report into Amri's disappearance to his wife
 
By NURBAITI HAMDAN Nation
Tuesday, 09 May 2023 2:18 PM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here has ordered the government to make a limited disclosure on a special task force report relating to the disappearance of activist Amri Che Mat, whom his family claimed to have been abducted.

Justice Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh, in his decision, said that the report - which was classified under the Official Secrets Act (OSA) 1972 - should be released by first respondent Mohd Russaini Idrus exclusively to Norhayati Mohd Ariffin, who is Amri's wife.

Mohd Russaini, who is the Police Force Commission secretary, is the secretary to the task force that investigated Amri's disappearance.

Justice Wan Ahmad Farid, who was delivering his decision in a judicial review application filed by Norhayati, said that he found the first respondent's explanation in his affidavit-in-reply in the judicial review as "not watertight".

"A general assertion that the report, if disclosed, would allow criminals and enemies of the state to take advantage of the police operation is insufficient," he said in the online proceedings here on Tuesday (May 9).

However, the court prohibited Norhayati from disclosing the report to any members of the public except for her lawyers in a main suit she filed in November 2019 against 21 parties including the government and the police over the alleged failure to effectively investigate her husband's alleged abduction.

The same order also applies to the applicant's lawyers.


The court did not make any order as to costs.

Norhayati was represented by lawyer Surendra Ananth while Senior Federal Counsels Shamsul Bolhassan and Ahmad Hanir Hambaly appeared for the respondents during the proceedings.

Norhayati had first filed the main civil suit in November 2019 over her husband's disappearance and sought the discovery of the task report to be disclosed for the purpose of legal action.

The defendants in the suit, however, objected to the discovery application on the grounds that the task report was classified under the OSA.

Norhayati then filed for leave for judicial review of the matter and she was granted leave on July 19, 2022.

At the same time, she withdrew the discovery application in her main suit.

When contacted, Surendra confirmed that the main suit against the 21 parties has been fixed for case management on May 19.

"The suit is also fixed for trial between June 19 and 22," he said.

Amri was allegedly abducted in Perlis close to midnight on Nov 24, 2016.

The vehicle he used was subsequently found in an abandoned construction site at Bukit Chabang, Perlis, at around 12.30am the next day. - Star, 9/5/2023

Govt appeals against order to release report on activist’s disappearance

The government has also obtained an order staying the release of the report pending the disposal of appeal.


The High Court had ordered the government to release the report on missing Amri Che Mat to his wife, Norhayati Ariffin, for the purpose of her civil suit.

KUALA LUMPUR: The government has filed an appeal to overturn a court order compelling it to release a classified report on the disappearance of activist Amri Che Mat to his wife.

Lawyer Larissa Ann Louis, appearing for Norhayati Ariffin, said the appeal was filed last week.  She said the government has also obtained an order staying the release of the report pending the disposal of appeal.

Last month, the High Court ordered the government to disclose the report prepared by a special task force to Norhayati within one month from May 9.

The court had, however, said Norhayati could only use the report for the purpose of her civil suit, and that she and her legal team were prohibited from disclosing it to third parties.

Amri, the founder of the NGO Perlis Hope, went missing in 2016, which led to a public inquiry into his disappearance by Suhakam between 2017 and 2019.

In 2021, the human rights commission concluded that Amri was a victim of an enforced disappearance carried out by the state, specifically by the police’s special branch.

In response, the home ministry established a task force to investigate Suhakam’s conclusions. It was given six months to complete its report.

Neither the ministry nor the task force has released the report despite repeated calls to do so by various parties, including Suhakam and other NGOs.

In December 2021, Norhayati filed a suit in the High Court seeking an order that the government declassify its report on her husband’s disappearance.

In the application to initiate a judicial review, she sought to set aside several provisions in the Official Secrets Act under which the report had been classified.

She also wanted the court to declare as unconstitutional the government’s decision to classify a report by the special task force on the disappearance of Amri and Pastor Raymond Koh as secret. - FMT, 7/6/2023

Thursday, July 06, 2023

Mandatory Death Penalty Abolished, But Review of Death Sentence Cannot Start Until Minister Puts Into Force the Revision of Sentence law. (MADPET)

 

 

Media Statement – 7/7/2023

Mandatory Death Penalty Abolished, But Review of Death Sentence Cannot Start Until Minister Puts Into Force the Revision of Sentence law.

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) celebrates the putting into force on 4/7/2023 by Minister Azalina Othman Said, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) the Abolition Of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, which was gazetted after receiving royal assent on 16/6/2023. This ends the era where judges had no choice but to sentence to death any person found guilty of some 11 offences that had the mandatory death penalty.

Put the Revision of Sentence Act into force so sentence revision can begin

MADPET urges that Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction Of The Federal Court) Act 2023(Revision of Sentence Act), which was also gazetted on 16/6/2023 be immediately put into force, so the Act will come into operation.

This is most important for the about 850 of about 1324 persons on death row, who have exhausted all appeals that now qualify to apply for a revision of sentence. He/she ‘…who is sentenced to death may make an application in writing to the Federal Court within ninety days from the date of coming into operation of this Act…(2) Upon receiving an application under subsection (1), the Federal Court shall review the sentence of death.’(Sec.3(1) and (2)Revision of Sentence Act].

Only after it is in force, can the many persons ‘…who is serving a sentence of imprisonment for natural life may make an application in writing to the Federal Court within ninety days from the date of coming into operation of this Act. (2) Upon receiving an application under subsection (1), the Federal Court shall review the sentence of imprisonment of natural life.’ {Sec.5(1) and (2)]

Government needs to assist in the review of sentence application and process

Given that there will be possibly about 1,000 or more review of sentence applications  filed and have to be heard by the already busy Federal Court, it is important that the State also plays an active part in assisting those who become entitled to make a review of sentence applications to ensure justice be done, and the objects of these new laws is given full effect speedily. This will also need assistance from the Prisons Departments, Public Prosecutor, Courts and others.

MADPET also calls on the Malaysian Bar, who has been a strong advocate for abolition, since the passing of the Bar Resolution calling for abolition of the death penalty in 2006, to step up and assist in the review of sentence process.

Judges Need To Note That Malaysia today is clearly for abolition of the death penalty since 2018

MADPET hopes that the Court, in hearing this sentence review applications will note that Malaysia has long adopted the position of moving towards the abolition of the death penalty in line with the global trend. In 2007, there were 104 nation states in favour of abolition. That number in favour has been systematically growing over the years. In 2008, it was 106. In 2010, it was 108. In 2012, it jumped to 111, and in 2016, it was 117 and now in 2022, it was 125, which meant more than two third of UN member States are for abolition.

On 15/12/2022, Malaysia was proudly amongst the 125 countries that voted in favor of the UN General Assembly’s “Moratorium on the use of the death penalty with a view to abolishing the death penalty” resolution.

Malaysia, under the Pakatan Harapan Plus government, voted for the very first time in favour of this resolution in 2018. The Perikatan Nasional (BERSATU, PAS included) and BN Plus Government again vote in favour the resolution in 2020.

PM Ismail Sabri, then PM Anwar Ibrahim brought about abolition of mandatory death penalty

On 6/10/2022, the Perikatan Nasional government under Prime Minister Ismail Sabri tabled 7 Bills that would abolish the mandatory death penalty, and this was the first concrete action by the government.

Post GE15, the new Bills were tabled, and now the Abolition Of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 abolished not just the mandatory death penalty but also natural life imprisonment. The PH-led government also tabled the law, Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction of The Federal Court) Act 2023, which is still not in force, allows those on death row and those under life imprisonment to apply to court for a review of the sentence.

In short, both the current government and the Opposition parties have now adopted the position of moving towards the abolition of the death penalty.

Justice Demands Court’s Understanding and Flexibility

Noting that in all cases that carried the mandatory death penalty, both the prosecution and lawyers representing the accused would have failed to adduce evidence that would have convinced the court to sentence the convicted to a lower sentence because it was of no use as the courts could only impose one sentence - the death penalty.

In these cases, which then carried the mandatory death penalty, there would have also been no submission of aggravating and mitigating factors that judges would consider before passing sentence, as there was only one sentence available - the death penalty.

As such, when it comes to the review of sentence of death now, there may be a need for serious re-evaluation of the court records and the facts, and justice may require the introduction of material new evidence, where it is hope that the court would be flexible in this extraordinary special situation.

Whipping, very different from the Islamic Caning, Must Be Abolished

Whilst, the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act would give judges the discretion on conviction  to impose the death penalty or alternatively jail of between 30 and 40 years as well as no fewer than 12 strokes of the cane or whipping, MADPET calls for the abolition of whipping, and for the granting of greater discretion in sentencing maybe jail between 10 and 40 years.

Now, that Malaysia has abolished mandatory death penalty, MADPET reiterates its call for Malaysia to totally abolish the death penalty. Maybe, the next step towards total abolition is the abolition of death penalty for offences where there is no victim that is killed or seriously injured by the perpetrator.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Abolishment of mandatory death penalty gazetted, to come into force tomorrow

Abolishment of mandatory death penalty gazetted, to come into force tomorrow
Malay Mail’s check with the Malaysia Federal Legislation website showed the gazettement dated June 30, 2023 and signed by de facto law minister Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said was uploaded today. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, July 3 — The abolishment of the mandatory death penalty will come into force tomorrow as the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 has been gazetted.

Malay Mail’s check with the Malaysia Federal Legislation website showed the gazettement dated June 30, 2023 and signed by de facto law minister Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said was uploaded today.

“In exercise of the powers conferred by subsection 1(2) of the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 (Act 846), the minister appoints July 4 2023 as the date on which the Act comes into operation,” said the statement.

The Dewan Rakyat passed the Bill proposing to make the death penalty an option and no longer mandatory after it was tabled for its third reading on April 3.

The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill would give judges the discretion on the death penalty rather than requiring them to do so when convicting on offences that made them mandatory.

The amendments in the Bill also include replacing life and natural life imprisonment (until death) as an alternative to the mandatory death sentence, with the new alternative of jail of between 30 and 40 years as well as no fewer than 12 strokes of the cane.

The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill 2023 was tabled for first reading in the Dewan Rakyat by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said on March 27 this year.

Azalina’s predecessor, Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar, had tabled a similar piece of legislation on October 6, 2022, but Parliament’s dissolution to pave the way for the 15th General Election meant it was never put before lawmakers for debate.

Since July 2018, Malaysia has placed a de facto moratorium on executions pending institutional reforms undertaken by the various administrations that have existed in that time.

The last death row prisoner was hanged in 2017 but because legislation carrying the mandatory death penalty has remained effective, the courts have been bound to continue sentencing defendants to death despite the moratorium on executions.


Read here for Malay Mail's explainer on the brief history of capital punishment and death row inmates in Malaysia. - Malay Mail, 3/7/2023

Malaysia

A brief history of Malaysia’s capital punishment and death row inmates

A brief history of Malaysia’s capital punishment and death row inmates
Decades after colonial rule, Malaysia has finally taken the first concrete steps towards abolishing the death penalty, after proposed legislation to make capital punishment optional and not mandatory was put before Parliament a second time. ― AFP pic

KUALA LUMPUR, April 3 — Decades after colonial rule, Malaysia has finally taken the first concrete steps towards abolishing the death penalty, after proposed legislation to make capital punishment optional and not mandatory was put before Parliament a second time.

The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill 2023 was tabled for first reading in the Dewan Rakyat by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said on March 27.

Azalina’s predecessor, Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar, had tabled a similar piece of legislation on October 6, 2022, but Parliament’s dissolution to pave the way for the 15th General Election meant it was never put before lawmakers for debate.

“Legal amendments involving policies on punishment and substitute sentence to the mandatory death penalty are a positive change to make the country’s criminal justice system more holistic and inclusive, apart from not denying individuals their basic right to proper justice,” Azalina told the Dewan Negara days before the Bill’s tabled for the first reading.

The current Bill seeks to revise the current death penalty by giving judges the discretion to mete out sentences on a case-by-case basis.

The amendments also include replacing life and natural life imprisonment (until death) as an alternative to the mandatory death sentence, with the new alternative of jail of between 30 and 40 years as well as no fewer than 12 strokes of the cane.

For the amendments to take effect, the Bill must obtain approval by way of three readings from both the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara, before being presented to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong for royal assent and subsequently gazetted.

Since July 2018, Malaysia has placed a de facto moratorium on executions pending institutional reforms undertaken by the various administrations that have existed in that time.

The last death row prisoner was hanged in 2017 but because legislation carrying the mandatory death penalty has remained effective, the courts have been bound to continue sentencing defendants to death despite the moratorium on executions.

A brief history of Malaysia’s capital punishment

The death penalty has occupied a place in the Malaysian criminal justice system ever since British colonial administration, when the mandatory death penalty was originally enforced for murder.

When Malaya achieved independence in 1957, it inherited the common law system including the death penalty introduced during the reign of British Malaya.

Did you know the well-known Dangerous Drugs Act was enacted by the British colonial government in 1952 to combat the threat of substance abuse, yet capital punishment for drug trafficking — under Section 39B — was not carried out until 1975?

The death penalty remained discretionary for Section 39B up until 1983 when the legal provision was amended to make it mandatory, after which Malaysia’s drug laws would go on to be considered as among the harshest in the world.

Today in Malaysia, 34 offences such as murder, drug trafficking, waging war against the state and terrorism were punishable by death. Of those, 11 carried a mandatory death sentence.

Executions are performed as hanging by the neck until death, and usually conducted on Fridays.

At present, Malaysia is one of 53 countries worldwide that still maintain the death penalty in both law and practice.

What are the numbers?

According to the Prison Department’s latest data, a total of 1,318 prisoners were sent to the gallows between 1992 and 2023 for one of seven capital offences that carried the mandatory death penalty.

The capital offences listed are Section 121, 302 and 396 of the Penal Code for waging war against a Ruler, murder and gang-robbery with murder, respectively; Section 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act for drug trafficking; Section 3 of the Kidnapping Act for abduction for ransom; and Section 3 and 3A of the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act for illegal firearms discharge.

The majority of the condemned — 870 of them or 66 per cent — comprised drug offenders, followed by convicted murderers at 318 or 24.1 per cent.

For the remainder, 16 were convicted for illegal firearms discharge, seven for waging war against the Agong, five for kidnapping, and two for gang-robberies.

Despite the movements to reform the death penalty, 2022 also saw the highest number of condemned persons at 123, of which 79 or 64.2 per cent were drug offenders followed by 44 or 35.8 per cent convicted of murder.

The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill seeks to abolish the mandatory death penalty, to vary the sentence of imprisonment for natural life and whipping, and to provide for matters connected therewith by amending the Penal Code (Act 574), the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971 (Act 37), the Arms Act 1960 (Act 206), the Kidnapping Act 1961 (Act 365), the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (Act 234), the Strategic Trade Act 2010 (Act 708) and the Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593) in line with the Government policy to abolish the mandatory death penalty in all legislation. - Malay Mail, 3/4/2023

Malaysia, amongst 125 countries, that voted in favour of the 2022 UN General Assembly Resolution towards abolition of the Death Penalty on 15/12/2022

 

Media Statement – 18/12/2022

Malaysia, amongst 125 countries, that voted in favour of the 2022 UN General Assembly Resolution towards abolition of the Death Penalty

On 15/12/2022, at Seventy-seventh Session 54th Meeting, the UN General Assembly’s adopted the “Moratorium on the use of the death penalty with a view to abolishing the death penalty” resolution. MADPET is proud that Malaysia was one of 125 nation states that voted in favour. Singapore and Brunei, sadly, were the only ASEAN member states amongst the 37 countries that voted against, and there were 22 abstentions.

This is an historic moment, when majority of two thirds was achieved, and the number of votes in favour continues to increase.  In 2020, there were 123 votes in favour to 38 against, with 24 abstentions. In 2018, it was 121 votes in favour, which also included Malaysia for the very first time.

In 2007, there were 104 in favour. In 2008, it was 106. In 2010, it was 108. In 2012, it jumped to 111, and in 2016, it was 117. As such, the global trend continues to be  towards the abolition of the death penalty

On 15/12/2022, after adoption of the Resolution, ‘the Assembly called on States to progressively restrict use of the death penalty and ensure that those facing it can exercise their right to apply for pardon or commutation… In addition, it called on States to ensure the death penalty is not applied based on discriminatory laws, improve conditions in detention and establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty…’(UN Meetings Coverage of GA)

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) is proud that Malaysia voted in favour of this Resolution that unequivocally calls for all countries to establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty.

Malaysia, under the Pakatan Harapan Plus government, voted in favour of this resolution in 2018. The Perikatan Nasional(BERSATU, PAS included) and BN Plus Government elected to again vote in favour in 2020. Now, the Pakatan Harapan Plus government under Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has taken the same stance in December 2022.

MADPET notes that Bills are now before the Parliament that will effectively abolish the mandatory death penalty, which we call all on MPs to vote in favour. This can be considered the first step towards abolition.

Thereafter, we call on the Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s Coalition Government led by Pakatan Harapan and to forthwith take the next step and abolish the death penalty in Malaysia speedily.

We recall that the then Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department of the then PH Plus Government, Datuk Liew Vui Keong on 13/11/2018 in Parliament did say that ‘…the Cabinet has decided that the death penalty for 33 offences under eight acts of law be abolished, and this includes Section 302 of the Penal Code (murder)...He said the decision, which was reached collectively,  also encompassed the Firearms (Heavier Penalties) Act 1971; Firearms Act 1960, Kidnapping Act  1961, Armed Forces Act 1972. Also in the list are the Water Services Industries Act 2006; Strategic Trade Act 2010 and Dangerous Drugs Act 1952. ..’(Malay Mail 13/11/2018).

When a country, especially a democratic nation State, executes a criminal, it inevitably makes all its citizens ‘murderers’.

A criminal reasonably must be punished for his/her crimes, but his life must never be extinguished. Sentencing must be fair, consistent, proportionate and with the opportunity for rehabilitation. The abolition of the death penalty, in favour of repentance, rehabilitation and second chances is consistent with the values of the different religions and cultures of the Malaysian people.

MADPET reiterates our call for the abolition of the death penalty, and for the moratorium on executions pending abolition.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

 

Saturday, June 24, 2023

Wrongfully jailed: 'I was among 35 inmates whipped on same day' - Will Anwar Ibrahim's government do better that Ismail Sabri?

It is good that Media reported the statement of now 28 groups PM Anwar Ibrahim and Malaysia needs to ensure justice be done to documented migrant worker Sabri, who was wrongly convicted, imprisoned and WHIPPED for being illegally in Malaysia(28 Groups)

See below also a Malaysiakini report in August 2022 -  Wrongfully jailed: 'I was among 35 inmates whipped on same day'



Groups call for RCI on wrongfully jailed, whipped Indonesian worker


The various rights NGOs and union bodies urge Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to offer Sabri Umar an apology on behalf of Malaysia.
FMT Reporters - 22 Jun 2023, 10:30am

Indonesian worker Sabri Umar after he was acquitted by the Tawau High Court last July. (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture pic)

PETALING JAYA: Over two dozen rights NGOs and union bodies have called for the government to set up a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) to probe a case involving an Indonesian worker who was wrongfully imprisoned and whipped for allegedly not having a valid work pass.

“We call on Malaysia to set up a RCI and look into the case of Sabri Umar and other rights violations that may have befallen many other migrant workers,” the 27 groups said in a joint statement.
Stay up-to-date by following FMT's Telegram channel


They said the current position of Malaysia seems to be the speedy repatriation of migrant workers despite them having outstanding claims against their immediate or past employers.

“This policy must change, and there must be no repatriation of migrant workers or foreign nationals until the human resources ministry determines that there are no outstanding or pending employment related claims against their employers,” the groups said.

The groups added that the home ministry must also determine that there are no outstanding claims against others, or that the migrant worker is not needed as a witness in any other cases.

The groups urged Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to offer an apology to Sabri on behalf of Malaysia, adding that “offering some compensation would also be just”.

The signatories to the statement include Aliran, Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (Madpet), North South Initiative (NSI), Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union to Union (Stieu), Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM) and the Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy.

In April 2022, Sabri was arrested and then sentenced to 11 months in prison and five strokes of the rotan by a sessions court under Section 6(1)(c) of the Immigration Act.

While waiting for his appeal to be heard, he was whipped in the Tawau prison on June 23.

The Tawau High Court acquitted him in July after his lawyer managed to prove that Sabri had a valid Indonesian passport and a work pass from his employer, Fu Yee Corp.

Upon release, Sabri needed a special pass to remain in Malaysia for one month to pursue justice, but was only given a two-week pass by the immigration department. This happened twice, and appeals were made to the home ministry but Sabri has yet to receive a decision on his appeals.

In August 2022, Sabri commenced a legal suit at the Tawau High Court against the home minister, the Sabah chief minister, the immigration department, and others, seeking a court order asking the minister to state his decision on Sabri’s two appeals against the immigration department’s decisions.

Sabri also filed a claim for reinstatement at the Industrial Court in May, but the case has yet to be heard.

The Tawau High Court dismissed Sabri’s application for a court order that would allow him to stay in the country legally until “his quest for justice is over”. Sabri then appealed to the Court of Appeal. - FMT, 22/6/2023
 

27 civil society groups demands justice for wrongfully convicted migrant worker in Malaysia


Civil Society


Photo on the right, Sabri Umar released from detention.



22 June 2023


By The Online Citizen


0

KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA — A coalition of 27 groups, trade unions, and organizations have issued a public statement demanding justice for Sabri Umar, an Indonesian migrant worker who has reportedly been wrongfully convicted and brutally punished in Malaysia.

The statement calls on Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and the Malaysian government to rectify what they describe as a “gross miscarriage of justice.” Sabri Umar, who had been lawfully employed in Malaysia for about seven years, was wrongfully charged and convicted for residing in Malaysia illegally.

He was whipped five times at Tawau Prison on June 23, 2022, and sentenced to 11 months of imprisonment by the Sessions Court on April 19, 2022.

According to the groups, Sabri was arrested at his workplace following an alleged sexual assault complaint filed by his employer, Fu Yee Corporation. Despite being presented with Sabri’s valid passport at the time of arrest, the authorities proceeded with the charges.

The Deputy Public Prosecutor, in possession of Sabri’s valid passport and work permit endorsed by the Immigration Department, continued with the charges. The undersigned groups question this decision, as the evidence clearly proved Sabri’s legal status in the country.

Furthermore, the Immigration Department tendered a document in court claiming no records on Sabri existed, contributing to his conviction. The coalition condemns this action and has expressed disappointment with Fu Yee Corporation for failing to notify the courts or authorities about Sabri’s wrongful conviction.

The groups also underline the role played by Sabri’s Union, the Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU), in bringing this issue to the fore. After their intervention, the High Court called up the case for revision and acquitted Sabri on July 22, 2022.

However, Sabri has encountered ongoing difficulties since his release, including short-term special passes from the Immigration Department and an unsuccessful High Court application to remain in Malaysia legally until his quest for justice is complete. Fearing further arrest and harassment, Sabri has temporarily returned to Indonesia.

The groups accuse the National Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM), the Malaysian Parliament, and the Home Minister of inaction regarding Sabri’s case, thus putting the onus on Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to intervene.

The statement stresses that failure to ensure justice in such cases could inadvertently encourage further rights violations and exploitation in Malaysia.

To prevent this, the undersigned groups call on the government to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate Sabri’s case, and others like it, and to review the current policy of repatriating migrant workers with outstanding claims or cases.

The statement concludes with an urgent call for a public apology and appropriate compensation for Sabri.

The groups demand action against those responsible and reiterate the need for a Royal Commission of Inquiry. They urge Malaysia, as a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council, to set an example by actively promoting and defending human rights of all, including migrant workers and foreign nationals.

The following are the 27 group signatories: 

ALIRAN
Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha(MASUM), India
Black Women for Wages for Housework
Building and Wood Workers International (BWI) Asia Pacific
Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
Global Women’s Strike
Haiti Action Committee
International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW AP)
Japan Innocence and Death Penalty Information Center
Labour Law Reform Coalition, Malaysia
Legal Action for Women, UK
MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)
Migrant Care, Indonesia
Network of Action For Migrants in Malaysia(NAMM)
North South Initiative, Malaysia
Payday Men’s Network (UK-US)
Persatuan Komuniti Prihatin Selangor & Kuala Lumpur
Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor(PSWS), Malaysia
Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), India
Sabah Plantation Industry Employees Union (SPIEU)
Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union to Union (STIEU)
Safety and Rights Society (SRS), Bangladesh
Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)
Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy
Union of Forestry Employees Sarawak (UFES)
WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)
Women of Color-Global Women’s Strike, US/UK - TOC, 22/6/2023



PM is urged to intervene in the wrongful conviction of Indonesian worker



By NURUL ATIKAH SARJI
23 Jun 2023 08:12pm 




According to the statement, on June 23, 2022, Sabri Umar was wrongfully charged and convicted for residing in Malaysia illegally whipped five times at Tawau Prison and having been lawfully employed in the country for about seven years. Filepic


SHAH ALAM - Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is urged to ensure justice is served for Indonesian migrant worker Sabri Umar, who was wrongfully prosecuted and punished in Malaysia.

Twenty-eight civil society groups have jointly issued a statement today, demanding justice for the migrant worker who suffered the ordeal exactly one year ago.

In the statement issued today, Sabri was wrongfully and illegally whipped five times, was wrongly charged, convicted, and sentenced to 11 months in prison and five strokes of whipping for being illegal on April 19, 2022, by the Sessions Court, and was wrongfully and illegally whipped five times at Tawau Prison on June 23, 2022.

This was even though he had been lawfully employed in the country for about seven years.

"In fact, Sabri's valid passport and work permit, which proved his legal status, were presented to the authorities at the time of his arrest, but the charges were still pursued.

"He was wrongfully prosecuted and given a sentence of 11 months in prison and five strokes of the whip on April 19, 2022, by the Sessions Court, and the groups claimed it was a gross miscarriage of justice," the statement read.

The coalition also criticises the Deputy Public Prosecutor for proceeding with the charges despite possessing Sabri's valid documents.

Also, the Immigration Department's negligence in claiming that there were no records of Sabri's existence caused his conviction.

"It is disappointing that the employer, one Fu Yee Corporation, who ought to be aware that Sabri was indeed a legal migrant worker in Malaysia, failed to inform the courts and other authorities that Sabri was wrongfully convicted and sentenced for being illegally in Malaysia.

"An employer’s obligation to a migrant worker is until the worker is safely back in his country of origin," it said.

Meanwhile, the Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU) intervened in the case, leading to his acquittal by the High Court; however, the statement mentioned that Sabri has faced ongoing difficulties since his release, including short-term special passes and an unsuccessful High Court application to remain in Malaysia legally until his quest for justice is complete.

The groups also criticised the National Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM), the Parliament, and the Home Minister for their alleged inaction in Sabri's case, calling out to Anwar to intervene.

To address the situation and prevent similar violations in the future, the coalition demands the establishment of a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate Sabri's case and others like it.

"There should also be a review of the current policy of repatriating migrant workers with outstanding claims or cases," it added.

The organisations emphasised Malaysia's position as a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council and pushed for action against those involved.

The 28 civil societies are as follows;

ALIRAN

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Building and Wood Workers International (BWI) Asia Pacific

WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)

Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha(MASUM), India

Black Women for Wages for Housework

Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)

Global Women’s Strike

Haiti Action Committee

International Women's Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW AP)

Japan Innocence and Death Penalty Information Center

Labour Law Reform Coalition, Malaysia

Legal Action for Women, UK

Migrant Care, Indonesia

Network of Action For Migrants in Malaysia(NAMM)

North South Initiative, Malaysia

Payday Men’s Network (UK-US)

Persatuan Komuniti Prihatin Selangor & Kuala Lumpur

Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor(PSWS), Malaysia

Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), India

Sabah Plantation Industry Employees Union (SPIEU)

Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union to Union (STIEU)

Safety and Rights Society (SRS), Bangladesh

Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)

Tenaganita, Malaysia

Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy

Union of Forestry Employees Sarawak (UFES)

Women of Color-Global Women’sStrike, US/UK - The Sinar Daily, 23/6/2023



News
Wrongfully jailed: 'I was among 35 inmates whipped on same day'
S Vinothaa
Published: Aug 17, 2022 7:45 AM

Updated: 10:05 AM

The Indonesian migrant worker who was wrongfully imprisoned and whipped said he was among 35 other Tawau Prison inmates who were whipped on the same day, one after another.

Recalling his harrowing experience waiting for his turn to be whipped, Sabri Umar said all the inmates were asked to strip with only a piece of cloth to cover their private parts.

“We took turns to step onto a wooden frame and our legs were spread apart but not bound. Our hands were spread upward and tied to the frame we were standing on.

“They untied us after the caning and told us to put on our shirts back while we waited in a group and watched others being caned,” described the 31-year-old, his voice quavered as if he was reliving the horror again.

Sabri said it was a terrifying moment being gathered in the same area and witnessing others before him being caned.

“Many of them screamed and cried, but those who were stronger didn’t cry. I remember one person receiving 10 strokes that day.

“After being caned, I immediately felt drained of all my energy. The cane tore the skin on my buttocks and I started to bleed after a few minutes.

“I could not sit for the next 10 days and I slept facing down to avoid making my wounds worse,” Sabri recalled.



Sabri’s woes

Over a period of just four months since April, the former employee of a plywood factory in Kalabakan in Tawau, Sabah, was wrongfully terminated of his employment, arrested and wrongfully detained by the Tawau police.

Sabri was investigated under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 but eventually charged and sentenced under Section 6(1) (c) of the Immigration Act 1959/63.

He claimed to be innocent of both charges, but the Sessions Court sentenced him to 11 months in jail and five strokes of the cane.

Four months after his arrest, Sabri was acquitted by the High Court in Tawau, but he lived in constant fear of a re-arrest under the sexual offence and of finding himself behind bars as swiftly as he was put there the first time.

Owing to the swift manner by which he was imprisoned and sentenced, Sabri agreed that there was a high possibility that there were other wrongfully imprisoned inmates in the Tawau Prison.

Sabri, who now has the support of the Indonesian Consulate in Tawau, was administered five strokes of the cane despite a pending notice of appeal and he told Malaysiakini that he would seek justice.

For two days after the whipping, Sabri was running a fever and he only took the yellow medicine handed to each inmate after the caning.

He alleged that they received no other medications and some inmates who also had fever were asked to just take a cold shower.

After his acquittal, he went to see a doctor and get himself checked as he was experiencing pain when urinating.

The consul at the Indonesia Consulate in Tawau, Heni Hamidah, told Malaysiakini that they sent Sabri for a second medical test on Monday to find out the extent of the complications resulting from the whipping.




‘Ratify UN Convention against torture’

Criminal lawyer Michelle Rossana Usman from Kota Kinabalu, who was engaged to represent the migrant worker by the Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union of which Sabri is a member, noted Malaysia’s notoriety for its flogging practices.

Quoting a statistic by Amnesty International, Michelle said the international human rights organisation estimates that as many as 10,000 people are subjected to caning in Malaysia every year, most of whom are foreign nationals.

"Sabri was unfortunately whipped for an offence that he could not have been guilty of as he had proper documentation to enter Malaysia as a migrant worker.

"It is high time Malaysia ratifies the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

"The government also needs to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights," she stressed.

Michelle, who is a member of the Sabah Human Rights Centre, pointed out that Sabri's case was an example of a workers' union member who was wrongfully charged with crimes he was not guilty of.

"What about the thousand others who are charged in our courts but are not represented at all?" she asked.

Michelle urged the government to amend existing legislation to treat immigration violations as administrative offences, rather than crimes punishable with imprisonment and caning.


Tawau Prison

Judicial caning in Malaysia and Saudi Arabia

Judicial caning in Malaysia is meted out for more than 60 criminal offences such as drug trafficking, rape, illegal entry into Malaysia under the Immigration Act 1959/63 and making false passports under the passport Act 1966.

According to the Amnesty International Report 2020/21, the judicial caning sentence was also meted out to Rohingya refugees during the pandemic.

Following protests from local activists, the sentence was set aside for the 27 Rohingya refugees at a hearing in the High Court in Alor Setar in 2020. However, the migrants continued to be caned, in addition to their prison sentences for illegal entry into Malaysia.

The 27 refugees, who were among 40 refugees convicted by a Magistrate’s Court in Langkawi for entering Malaysia without a valid permit, had obtained legal representation to appeal.

The 40 were also sentenced to seven months in jail.

The High Court in Alor Setar decided that caning would be inhumane as the men were refugees with no prior history of criminal activity or violence.

Meanwhile, a country that was known to carry out flogging in public squares, Saudi Arabia, abolished that corporal punishment in April 2020.

Crown Prince Mohammed Salman has spared the rod and offenders will instead be fined or receive jail sentences.


- Malaysiakini, 17/8/2022


Thursday, June 22, 2023

22/6/2023(Anniversary of a migrant being whipped wrongly) - Media Statement of 28 Groups

 # Statement carried by media, amongst others Free Malaysia Today, The Online Citizen

28 Group Media Statement – 22/6/2023(Anniversary of a migrant being whipped wrongly)

PM Anwar Ibrahim and Malaysia needs to ensure justice be done to documented migrant worker Sabri, who was wrongly convicted, imprisoned and WHIPPED for being illegally in Malaysia.

We, the 28 undersigned groups, the trade unions, organizations and we call on Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and the Malaysian government to ensure that justice is done in the Sabri Umar case, the documented Indonesian migrant worker who was wrongly charged and convicted for being in Malaysia illegally in Malaysia. 

 


On 23/6/2022, one year ago, documented Indonesian migrant worker Sabri Umar, was wrongfully and illegally whipped 5 times at Malaysia’s Tawau Prison on 23/6/2022. Sabri Umar, who had been working legally in Malaysia for about 7 years, suffered a GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE when he was wrongly charged, convicted and sentenced to 11 months in prison and 5 strokes of whipping for being illegally in Malaysia on19/4/2022 by the Sessions Court.

When the police arrested Sabri at his workplace, the employer handed his valid passport to the police, which should have been clear evidence that he was a legal worker in Malaysia.

The Deputy Public Prosecutor who charged him in court had Sabri’s passport/s, which also had the Immigration Department’s endorsement of his still valid work permit. There was no reason why he he was even charged for being illegally in Malaysia.

The Immigration Department keeps record of entry, and also issues work permits – but then, it is a mystery why the Immigration Department submitted a document stating that there was no records on Sabri. This document, which was also tendered in court by the prosecution, would have confused the court.

It was the employer’s action of making a police report of an alleged sexual assault that cause Sabri to be arrested on 5/4/2022. It is disappointing that the Employer, one Fu Yee Corporation, who ought to be aware that Sabri was indeed a legal migrant worker in Malaysia failed to inform the courts and/or other authorities that Sabri was wrongfully convicted and sentenced for being illegally in Malaysia. An employer’s obligation to a migrant worker is until the worker is safely back in his country of origin.

The Injustice Was Highlighted by the Union and Civil Society

It was only because of Sabri’s Union, the Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU), that finally moved Human Rights Defenders, Civil Society and Trade Unions to highlight this gross injustice through various actions including Joint Statements, amongst others, by 46 groups on 19/7/2022 entitled Sabri, Migrant Worker Wrongfully Whipped Before Appeal Heard. The statement was reported by media.

On 22/7/2022, the High Court called up the case for Revision, and Sabri was finally acquitted.

On release, Sabri had to get a Special Pass to remain in Malaysia to pursue justice, but alas the Immigration Department only gave him a 2-weeks Pass, not the usual 1-month Pass and for the reason for Sabri to make arrangement to leave Malaysia. This happened twice, and appeals were made to the Home Minister but to date Sabri is yet to get the decision on his appeals. Hopefully the current Home Minister will finally make a decision.

In fear of being repatriated forcefully back to Indonesia, Sabri filed a High Court case to get a court order that will allow him to stay legally in Malaysia until he will be able to complete his quest of justice. Unfortunately, the High Court denied his application, and he then had to appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Sabri, subjected to ongoing harassment and threats from various quarters have now returned to Indonesia, hopefully temporarily. He was also in fear of being arrested again, imprisoned and whipped again.

National Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM)

On 10/8/2022, 47 parties including Sabri filed a Petition/Complaint to SUHAKAM urging also a Public Inquiry but sadly SUHAKAM came back and said that they will not not inquire into any complaint relating to any allegation of the infringement of human rights which- (a) is the subject matter of any proceedings pending in any court, including any appeals; or (b) has been finally determined by any court.’. This possibly was because he had a case for wrongful dismissal at the Industrial Court, but previously SUHAKAM despite there being a case in court had decided to hold a public inquiry in an enforced disappearance matter. We hope that SUHAKAM reconsider and inquire into this matter.

Malaysian Parliament

The matter was also brought to Parliament and the Malaysian Parliamentary Special Select Committee On Fundamental Liberty And Constitutional Rights on 16/8/2022, whereby a Joint Statement was also issued on that day entitled  ‘Call On Malaysian Parliamentary Special Select Committee To Ensure That Migrant Worker Sabri Umar’s Pursuit For Justice Is Not Impeded By Deportation And Other Means.’. Sadly, Parliament too failed to do anything till now, and we hope that this new Parliament will act.

Home Minister Yet To Decide on Sabri’s Appeal

The Home Minister has yet to respond to Sabri’s 2 appeals against the decisions of the Immigration Department to date.

What good is a right and a clear procedure in the law, if the Minister simply does not respond to appeals. Without the Minister’s decision on appeal, Sabri cannot use his right to take the matter up for Judicial Review in the High Court, if still dissatisfied with the Minister’s decision.

The failure of the State, the Parliament and even the National Human Rights Institution to do the needful to ensure justice in Sabri’s case is appalling. What use is laws that provides procedures for victims seeking justice if the Minister just ignores appeals in accordance to law.

Will PM Anwar do the needful to ensure justice be done?

Malaysia now has a new Prime Minister since November 2022, and we call on the Prime Minister and the government of Malaysia to do the needful to ensure justice is done in the Sabri Umar’s case.

The world is watching, to see if Malaysia is also against violation of rights of Sabri and other migrant workers, who reasonably have contributed much to the economy of Malaysia.  

A government committed to human rights and justice, and would ensure that all migrant workers whose rights are violated will find redress in Malaysia. The avenues available to these victims, when rights are violated in Malaysia are in Malaysia – the cannot claim justice in their countries of origin, unless Malaysia creates the possibility by giving other countries jurisdiction, or creating mechanisms in Malaysian embassies in these countries from where migrant workers come from.

The failure of Malaysia to ensure justice be done in cases involving rights violations of migrant workers and foreign nationals in Malaysia, would inadvertently encourage exploitation and rights violations, or even trafficking in Malaysia. The perpetrator will be emboldened to violate other migrants in the future, knowing that they get off scot free.

Royal Commission to look into Sabri’s and other Migrant victims of rights violations

We call on Malaysia to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry and look into the case of Sabri and other rights violations that may have befallen many other migrant workers.

Policy Change - No repatriation until confirmation of no outstanding claims/cases

The current position of Malaysia seems to be the speedy repatriation of migrant workers when their employment in Malaysia, irrespective of the fact that these migrant workers may have outstanding claims of worker or human rights violations against their immediate past employers and others.

This policy must change, and there must be NO repatriation of migrant workers or foreign nationals until the Minister of Human Resources determine that there are no outstanding or pending employment related claims against employers. The Home Minister must also determine that there is no outstanding claims against others, or that the migrant worker is not a needed witness in any other cases. The rights of migrant workers must also be protected by Malaysia – including the right to seek justice, including compensations.

Sabri victim of Malaysian Public Officers Actions or Negligence

Noting that in the Sabri’s case, that his claims arise also by reason of failings of public officers whose actions/omissions or negligence caused him to suffer loss of liberty from 5/4/2022 until 22/7/2022, and suffering by reason being whipped 5 times, it is only right that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Malaysia not only look into this matter, but also consider apologizing and compensating Sabri justly. Action must also be taken against the perpetrators.

Therefore, we call on Malaysia’s new Prime Minister, on behalf of Malaysia, to forthwith tender an apology to Sabri bin Umar, a migrant worker from Indonesia, Malaysia’s neighbor and fellow ASEAN Member State. A compensation would also be just.

We reiterate out call that Malaysia considers a Royal Commission of Inquiry to look into this matter, noting that Malaysia depends highly on migrant workers, and Malaysia needs to defend and protect the rights of these foreign workers.

Malaysia, being a member to the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) for the term 2022-2024, must set an example of a State that actively promotes and defends human rights of all, even migrant workers and foreign nationals in Malaysia.

Charles Hector

Apolinar Z. Tolentino, Jr

 

For and on behalf the following 28 groups

ALIRAN

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Building and Wood Workers International (BWI) Asia Pacific

WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)

Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha(MASUM), India

Black Women for Wages for Housework

Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)

Global Women’s Strike

Haiti Action Committee

International Women's Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW AP)

Japan Innocence and Death Penalty Information Center

Labour Law Reform Coalition, Malaysia

Legal Action for Women, UK

Migrant Care, Indonesia

Network of Action For Migrants in Malaysia(NAMM)

North South Initiative, Malaysia

Payday Men’s Network (UK-US)

Persatuan Komuniti Prihatin Selangor & Kuala Lumpur

Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor(PSWS), Malaysia

Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), India

Sabah Plantation Industry Employees Union (SPIEU)

Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union to Union (STIEU)

Safety and Rights Society (SRS), Bangladesh

Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)

Tenaganita, Malaysia

Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy

Union of Forestry Employees Sarawak (UFES)

Women of Color-Global Women’s Strike, US/UK

 

See earlier posts

Migrant Worker WHIPPED before High Court heard and decided on Appeal against conviction/sentence? Unjust? Contempt?

SUHAKAM Must Reconsider, just like in 2018, the decision to stop investigation and not hold Public Inquiry on the case of Sabri, the wrongfully detained, convicted, sentenced and whipped documented migrant worker(38 Groups)

SUHAKAM lost its teeth? No decision yet on wrongly detained/whipped Sabri's on whether a Public Inquiry (reqested by 47 Groups) will be held? see SUHAKAM Petition

Call On Malaysian Parliamentary Special Select Committee To Ensure That Migrant Worker Sabri Umar’s Pursuit For Justice Is Not Impeded By Deportation And Other Means.-- Rights And Liberties In Law Is Meaningless, If Victims Are Deterred From Using Available Avenues In Malaysia - 25 Groups, 16/8/2022

Sabri Umar's quest for justice continues to be hamperred as Immigration Department once again gives a 2-weeks Special Pass?

Sabri, Migrant Worker Wrongfully Whipped Before Appeal Heard - Statement of 45 Groups- 19/7/2022

Do not send recently acquitted wrongly convicted migrant worker out of Malaysia until he exercises his rights in Malaysian Courts and other avenues of justice - No attempts of ‘cover-up’ or preventing access of justice(19 Gps) - 24/7/2022

Malaysia wanting Sabri to leave Malaysia and not remain in Malaysia to pursue his rights against police and government agencies appaling - 29 Group Statement 4/8/2022

 Whipping must be abolished - it is inhumane, it is torture,...34,923 poor migrants whipped (2002-2008)



Image from NST,24/11/2014 - https://www.nst.com.my/news/2015/09/govt-wants-gazette-museum-heritage-site