Thursday, March 16, 2023

Peaceful Assembly Act which violates peoples’ REAL right to peaceful assembly must be repealed -MADPET

 

Media Statement – 17/3/2023

Peaceful Assembly Act which violates peoples’ REAL right to peaceful assembly must be repealed

Police must stop harassment of participants of peaceful assembly like Women's March Malaysia (WMMY) 2023

The police subsequent crackdown on participants of Women's March Malaysia (WMMY) 2023 held on 12/3/2023 in conjunction of the International Women's Day, which saw about 200 participants.

At night the police said that they were now investigating pursuant with regard offences under Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 and Minor Offences Act 1995.(NST, 12/3/2023)  Worse, notices to be present at police station for investigation were send out to about 7 in the middle of the night according to the organisers of the March.(Star, 13/3/2023)

Peaceful Assembly is a RIGHT, recognized in Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, whereby Article 10 also gives us the right to freedom of speech and expression. Thus, participants in a peaceful assembly can shout out and even hold placards calling out for matters, issues, concerns or rights that even the government of the day may not support.

Peaceful Assembly is a means of advocating issues and concerns to the public to create awareness and garner more support. That is why a peaceful assembly rightly should be organised in a place where it can be seen and heard by the public. So many times, have permission to have a peaceful assembly in Dataran Merdeka been denied when really it is a good venue for a peaceful assembly. It should be a right to have a peaceful assembly in any public space.

A peaceful assembly attracts participants from all walks of society, not just members of organisation or political parties, and, as such, it is absurd to hold responsible the organiser for actions of some individual participants who may have come to join the protest on becoming aware of it.  

Draconian Peaceful Assembly Act Enacted Despite Protest

It must be remembered that the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 was enacted despite protest from the Malaysian Bar, SUHAKAM, civil society and many others.

On 29/11/2011, the Malaysian Bar organized the “Walk for Freedom 2011: Peaceful Assembly Bill Cannot and Must Not Become Law!”, which reportedly was attended by about 1,500.

Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 is a draconian law that restricts and deters the exercise of the REAL right to peaceful assembly.

Police the ‘permission giver’ for a human right to be exercised makes no sense

It simply gives the police too much power even to impose conditions and restrictions. Even after ‘giving approval, the police can suddenly change their mind and impose other restrictions.

On 17/6/2022, Malaysian Bar’s ‘Walk for Judicial Independence’ attended by about 500 lawyers were suddenly prevented by the police from marching to Parliament from the assembly point in Padang Merbok. Previously, the could march to Parliament and restriction was placed on number of representatives that could go beyond the Parliament gate.

No immediate peaceful assembly in Malaysia

People in Malaysia cannot speedily exercise the right to peaceful assembly because of the 5-day notice to police requirement and the other onerous obligations imposed by the law. So, for example, when Israel commits atrocities against the Palestinians or the government tables a ‘bad’ law, people in Malaysia can no longer can organize an immediate peaceful assembly, something which often happened before the Act.  A protest more than 5 days later is simply too late, and will likely not get much public support or media attention.

No right for children, and even18, 19 and 20 year olds who already can vote

UNDI18 allows those who are 18 or above to vote but the PAA says they cannot organize a peaceful assembly unless they are 21 and above. It denies the right of children to organize and participate in peaceful assemblies despite Malaysia being a signatory of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Denial of non-Malaysians the right to peaceful assembly

PAA unjustifiably denies Non-Malaysians the right to peaceful assembly. Hence, Myanmar nationals could not protest the violation of rights of the Rohingya people, or even dangerous rare earth factories.

Onerous obligations and duties imposed on ‘organisers’

The organisers are, amongst others, made responsible for all participants not breaking any laws, arranging ‘security’ to be in charge of the orderly conduct. bear the clean-up cost and get the consent of the owner or occupier of the place of assembly.

Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 is a tool to control and restrict the exercise of the right to peaceful assembly. It is also used to deter, as often actions like that taken against the participants of the of Women's March. All in all it deters, when it should be protecting the exercise of the right. The government, including the police, should be protecting those that exercise this right, and not the opposite.

Before Peaceful Assembly Act, things were generally better?

Before the enactment of Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, there was a better right to peaceful assembly but the problem then was the gathering of more than 3 or 5 was considered a crime, and as such the risk was being charged for taking part in a peaceful assembly – but then when peaceful assemblies do happen, the police ask the people after some time to disperse and that it that. Seldom did we find persons investigated or charged, save for the later 1998 Reformasi protests which saw hundreds arrested and charged.

Section 141 of the Penal Code – that prevents the assembly of 5 or more

It must be noted, that despite the enactment of Peaceful Assembly Act 2O12, Section 141 of the Penal Code strangely is still not repealed, where it says that ‘An assembly of five or more persons is designated an "unlawful assembly", if it, amongst others, cause mischief or criminal trespass, or other offence. As we know excessive noise is an offence under the Minor Offences Act, and we recall that in 2015, 11 workers from National Union of Tobacco Industry Workers (NUTIW) was arrested from the legal picket for ‘excessive noise’.

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) calls for the immediate repeal of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012. Another Act that truly respects the right of peaceful assembly could always be later enacted.

MADPET also calls for the repeal of Section 114 of the Penal Code that criminalizes or deters the right to peaceful assembly.

MADPET calls for the police to stop ‘harassing’ participants of Women's March Malaysia (WMMY) 2023 and other persons who exercised their right of peaceful assembly.

MADPET calls for Malaysia to recognize and defend peoples’ right to peaceful assembly.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

Women's March Malaysia organisers slam police action against speakers, participants

Share to LinkedInShare to More

KUALA LUMPUR: The organising committee of the Women's March Malaysia (WMMY) 2023 today condemned the actions taken by the police towards its participants, speakers, organisers and observers.

It said the Notice 111 sent out to seven participants, speakers, and organisers of WMMY in the middle of the night marked a troubling precedent against democratic action under the newly-elected unity government.

"We recall and remind this current government of its long history of democratic actions and expressions and the use of public assembly and protests over the last several decades before it came to power.

"We are disheartened and disappointed at being penalised for exercising our democratic right to fight for a better Malaysia.

"Do we not deserve to express our thoughts, talk about the issues that plague the lives of one too many people, and ask for changes that will create the Malaysia Madani that the unity government wants," it said in a statement today.

It said Article 10 of the Malaysian Federal Constitution clearly states that every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression, and all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms.

"The organisers took all the necessary steps to inform relevant authorities and follow the rules and regulations in place before the march."

The committee said Malaysia has an obligation as a signatory to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women to ensure the full protection of human rights for women and girls, including transgender people and sexual minorities.

"The heavy-handed reaction of the police against peaceful protesters at the Women's March will reflect badly on Malaysia's upcoming CEDAW review this year, shining light on the disproportionate use of police powers on a national and international level."

It said the police should desist from investigating and charging anyone merely for exercising the fundamental right to peacefully assemble, instead of allocating priority towards more pressing injustices raised during the march, such as child marriage, online and physical gender-based violence, and protecting groups facing marginalisation.

"This is a critical time for the newly elected government to show their commitment towards improving its human rights record by making it an obligation to assess the impact towards citizens' rights in peaceful assemblies.

"We urge the government to address the trust deficit of citizens towards our core institutions, and restore public confidence by acting on the accepted UN recommendation 151.147: revise the Peaceful Assembly Act to eliminate discrimination and hindrance to the freedom of association and peaceful assembly."

Yesterday, Dang Wangi district police chief, ACP Noor Dellhan Yahaya, said the police are investigating the assembly and march that took place in front of the Sogo Complex and Dataran Merdeka.

He said police had opened an investigation paper under Section 9 (5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 and Section 14 of the Minor Offences Act 1995.

Noor Dellhan said the police were in the process of identifying all the individuals involved and would call them up to record their statements. - NST, 13/3/2023
 

Police open investigation into assembly in KL


KUALA LUMPUR: The police are investigating an assembly and march that took place today in front of the Sogo Complex and Dataran Merdeka.

Dang Wangi district police chief, ACP Noor Dellhan Yahaya, said the march involved 150 people comprising human rights activists, university students, and members of political parties.

"The unauthorised assembly and march were held in violation of the law. Police detected the event at 10am.

"Based on police observation, the participants were found to have gathered and marched while holding placards with words like 'Imagine If Men Are As Disgusted With Rapes As With Periods, Child Not Pride, Trans Women Are Women, Police Your Behaviour Not My Body' and others," he said in a statement.

He said police have opened an investigation paper under Section 9 (5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 and Section 14 of the Minor Offences Act 1995.

Police are in the process of identifying all individuals involved and will call them up to record their statements, he said.

"The investigation paper will be completed and referred to the deputy public prosecutor for further instructions.

"The public is advised not to participate in any illegal assembly as action will be taken against them." - BERNAMA - NST, 12/.3/2023

Women's March organisers criticise cops for heavy-handed response


 

PETALING JAYA: The organisers of the recent Women's March 2023 have lambasted the police for its heavy-handed response toward peaceful protestors.

In a statement on Monday (March 13), it condemned the actions taken by the police against the participants, speakers, organisers and observers of the Women's March Malaysia 2023 (WMMY).


"The press statement issued by the PDRM on March 12, which was followed by Notice 111 sent out to seven participants, speakers, and organisers of WMMY in the middle of the night, marks a troubling precedent against democratic action under the newly-elected unity government.

"We recall and remind this current government of its long history of democratic actions and expressions and the use of public assembly and protests over the last several decades prior to its coming to power," it said, adding that they were disheartened and disappointed at being penalised for exercising their democratic rights to fight for a better Malaysia.

It asked if they did not deserve to express thoughts, talk about the issues that plague the lives of one too many people, and ask for changes that will create the Malaysia Madani the unity government wanted.

"The 'I' in Madani stands for 'ihsan' which asks for us to treat everyone, especially minorities, with empathy and kindness.

"Our demands are meant to highlight to the government nine areas that must be addressed immediately to ensure that the basic rights of everyone are no longer trampled upon in Malaysia," it said, adding that Article 10 of the Malaysian Federal Constitution clearly states that every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression, all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms.


It said the organisers of Women's March 2023 took all the necessary steps to inform relevant authorities and follow the rules and regulations in place before the march.

"Malaysia has an obligation as a signatory to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Cedaw) to ensure the full protections of human rights for women and girls, including transgender people and sexual minorities.

"The heavy-handed reaction of the police against peaceful protestors at a Womens March will reflect badly on Malaysia's upcoming Cedaw review this year, shining light on the disproportionate use of police powers on a national and international level," it said adding that the police should refrain from investigating and charging anyone merely for exercising the fundamental right to peacefully assemble, instead allocating priority towards more pressing injustices raised during the Women's March, such as child marriage, online and physical gender-based violence, and protecting groups facing marginalisation.

It said that this was a critical time for the newly-elected government to show its commitment towards improving its human rights record by making it an obligation to assess the impact towards citizens' rights in peaceful assemblies.

"We urge the government to address the trust-deficit of citizens towards our core institutions, and restore public confidence by acting on the accepted UN recommendation 151.147: revise the Peaceful Assembly Act in order to eliminate discrimination and hindrance to the freedom of association and peaceful assembly.

"If that is the vision for a new and improved Malaysia, why are the authorities going against the very principle of what the Malaysian Government claims it stands for?" it asked. - Star, 13/3/2023

 

 

Sunday, March 12, 2023

Remove Saifuddin Nasution As Home Minister as he has been found wanting - Home Minister must be someone who respects Rule of Law, Human Rights and Justice, and do not fear criticizing the police and will get rid of draconian laws like SOSMA

 

Media Statement – 13/3/2023

Remove Saifuddin Nasution As Home Minister as he has been found wanting

Home Minister must be someone who respects Rule of Law, Human Rights and Justice, and do not fear criticizing the police and will get rid of draconian laws like SOSMA

When Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, in a Parliamentary Reply said that 401 was punished (not tried and convicted) in 2022 under Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA), doubts have arisen about his suitability to continue to be Home Minister of Malaysia.

Does this Minister not understand the Rule of Law, and the administration of criminal justice? The law cannot be used to PUNISH anyone, save for those already charged, accorded a fair trial, found guilty and sentenced. The sentence is the only punishment permissible by law. Arrest and pre-conviction detention should NEVER be abused to punish anyone.

‘..A total of 624 individuals were detained under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act (Sosma) last year, says Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. The Home Minister added that 140 of these detainees had already been released. “Of those detained, 71 were charged in court, 401 were punished, 140 were released and 12 are still under investigation,” he said in a written reply to a question by Chow Yu Hui (PH-Raub) in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday. ..’(Star, 7/3/2023)

Only 71 out of 624 SOSMA victims were charged in court. SOSMA is NOT a Detention Without Trial Law. Post arrest detention without trial is only for purpose of investigation, nothing else. Police cannot use detention or torture, even under SOSMA, for the purpose of ‘punishing’ anyone in Malaysia

Of the 624 arrested and detained for offences were listed in SOSMA, only 71 were apparently charged and tried – meaning that almost 550 innocent persons have ended up becoming victims of SOSMA, and they possibly suffered detention or prolonged detention in police custody, as SOSMA allows for detention beyond the maximum 14 days stipulated in Malaysia’s Criminal Procedure Code.

The Minister must disclose how many days they spend in police custody, and how much suffering they endured with regard to the employment, business or income generating activities, which all affects not just the detainee but also the family and children, more so, if the detained was the sole or primary bread winner. Really, Malaysia, must for the sake of justice, consider how we can compensate victims of SOSMA and other criminal laws, for their loss of liberty, rights and losses when they have held in detention in the administration of criminal justice.

Post arrest custody for purposes of investigation ONLY – equal treatment for all.

For suspects, police should only keep them in police custody when absolutely needed for the purpose of investigation. Police can always continue investigation without any arrest or detention. Suspects can be asked to turn up when needed for questioning and statements. We have seen this done in the cases of former Prime Minister Najib and most recently former Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin. They never had to spend day/s in police lock-ups.

In the administration of criminal justice, law enforcement must never discriminate based on poverty, ethnicity, class or position, consistent with Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution that states, ‘(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.’

Home Minister Must Understand Human Rights, Justice and Rule of Law

A Home Minister, who is responsible for criminal law enforcement, must be a person who understands the Rule of Law, justice and human rights. He must understand the presumption of innocence until found guilty by a court of law after fair trial. He must never condone police abuse of powers, or the use of law for any other ulterior motives like ‘punishment’ before conviction.

The Minister is not supposed to condone wrongs of the police, but must fearlessly point out the wrongs, and reform the administration of criminal justice. How can he not criticize the use of SOSMA to PUNISH? Did ‘punish’ in his Parliamentary Reply mean something else?

SOSMA needed? Maintained and not to be repealed because not in PH GE15 Manifesto?

In December last year, Saifuddin said the government had no intention of reviewing SOSMA. On 16/2/2023, the Minister said SOSMA still a relevant act to maintain national security and the government is committed to strengthen the law. (Star, 16/2/2023) "The police still need the law to implement any urgent action to prevent panic among the people and address threats to the country's sovereignty and the wellbeing of the people," he said in a written reply yesterday [15/2/2023].(New Straits Times).

The Malaysian police and law enforcement, if they are professional and competent, can certainly carry out law enforcement urgently without SOSMA. They can already investigate and charge anyone who has broken the law.

 MADPET believes law enforcement do not need SOSMA, being an Act to provide for special measures relating to security offences for the purpose of maintaining public order and security and for connected matters. SOSMA wrongly allows for not certain requirements of the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code and Evidence Act. Why?

If there is a need for certain serious security offences, where the police need longer maximum period in detention for the purposes of investigation, then the law can provide for it but the role of the Magistrate must be maintained.

SOSMA excludes Magistrate role to ensure no abuse.

Article 5(4) of the Federal Constitution says, ‘Where a person is arrested and not released, he shall without unreasonable delay, and in any case within twenty-four hours (excluding the time of any necessary journey) be produced before a magistrate and shall not be further detained in custody without the magistrate’s authority.’

Under SOSMA, there is no need to bring before the Magistrate, In SOSMA, after 24 hours in custody after arrest, all it needs is that ‘a police officer of or above the rank of Superintendent of Police may extend the period of detention for a period of not more than twenty-eight days, for the purpose of investigation.’ 

Does not the Home Minister, PM Anwar Ibrahim and the PH-led government fail to understand the role of the Magistrate and remand hearings? It is to protect suspect’s rights and to ensure that the police do not abuse their powers, including by torture, when police custody post-arrest detention only permissible for purposes of investigation.

Police can only keep a suspect in custody for questioning and other investigations requiring the presence of the suspect. A suspect cannot be held simply to ‘punish’.

The Magistrate and the remand hearing that give the suspect right to be heard is to prevent abuse and protect human rights,

Remember that Parliament in its wisdom in 2007 amended the law to set new maximums of the length of remand orders a Magistrate can give in an application, where it is now depends on seriousness of the offence, and for serious offences like murder, it is 7 days. Previously, that maximum on the 1st application could be 14 days. Parliament wanted the police to bring the suspect before the Magistrate regularly.

Sadly, our current Home Minister and government, despite the call of the Malaysian Bar, SUHAKAM, civil society and justice loving Malaysian fails to understand the need for the immediate repeal of SOSMA

Saifuddin Nasution, the PKR secretary-general and Pakatan Harapan secretary-general, maybe a good Member of Parliament and politician but, according to MADPET, he does not qualify to remain the Home Minister.

MADPET calls on the Home Minister to resign, or alternatively urge Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to remove him as Home Minister, or even from the Cabinet. Choose a Home Minister that understands and respects human rights, and will always uphold justice.

MADPET calls for a disclosure of how the 401 held under SOSMA that was punished last year.

MADPET reiterates the call for the immediate repeal of SOSMA.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) 

Hundreds held under Sosma, Poca and Pota last year

Tuesday, 07 Mar 2023

KUALA LUMPUR: A total of 624 individuals were detained under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act (Sosma) last year, says Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail (pic).

The Home Minister added that 140 of these detainees had already been released.

“Of those detained, 71 were charged in court, 401 were punished, 140 were released and 12 are still under investigation,” he said in a written reply to a question by Chow Yu Hui (PH-Raub) in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday.

Chow had asked about the number of those detained under Sosma, as well as the breakdown of their race and ages.

He also enquired about the number of those detained under the Prevention of Crime Act (Poca) and the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Pota).

Last month, Saifuddin Nasution, in a written reply to RSN Rayer (PH-Jelutong), said Sosma was still a relevant law to maintain national security because it allows the police to take immediate action to defuse any threats to national sovereignty and harmony.

Repealing Sosma was not among the pledges in Pakatan Harapan’s GE15 election manifesto, though several DAP leaders had previously criticised Sosma as having draconian provisions.

Meanwhile, Saifuddin Nasution said those detained under Sosma last year were between 18 and 69 years old and included 247 Malays, 83 Chinese, 89 Indians, 47 of other races and 158 foreigners.

On Poca, Saifuddin said that 132 individuals were detained, of which 67 were Malays, 13 Chinese, 38 Indians, 13 of other races and one foreigner.

He said those detained were between 19 and 59 years old.

Poca, which was amended in 2015, is a preventative law to deal with criminals, particularly members of secret societies, terrorists and other undesirable persons.

Saifuddin Nasution said that only one individual, a Malay, was detained under Pota and is currently under a detention order.

Pota, which was passed in April 2015, allowed authorities to take action against Malaysians suspected of being involved with the Islamic State or other terrorist organisations.

To a written question by Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan (PN-Tasek Gelugor), Saifuddin said that as of Jan 30 this year, 195 individuals were detained under Sosma and are currently undergoing trial.

Of this total, 46 were for smuggling and human trafficking, two for terrorism and 147 for organised crime under the Penal Code. - Star, 7/3/2023

No review of Sosma for now – Saifuddin reiterates

Bernama
Published:  Dec 15, 2022 5:43 PM
Updated: 5:43 PM

Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail today reiterated that the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma) would not be amended for now.

However, there was a possibility of Sosma being reviewed in the future, he told reporters after visiting the Malaysia Volunteers Corps Department (Rela) headquarters today.

"My stand is that laws are dynamic and not static, and we have Parliament to formulate and amend laws.

"We need to respond according to the situation from time to time. And should it be amended now? No. This is my principle and stand at the moment,” he said when asked to comment on DAP deputy chairperson Gobind Singh Deo’s call for him to reconsider his statement on Sosma.

Saifuddin had said on Tuesday that he did not intend to review Sosma and that unlike the abolished Internal Security Act 1967 (ISA), it did not provide for detention without trial.

Yesterday, Gobind, who is also Damansara MP, urged Saifuddin to reconsider his stand on Sosma, saying it contradicted Pakatan Harapan’s (Harapan) longstanding view that Sosma was oppressive in nature.

The former communications and multimedia minister suggested that Sections 6, 13, 14 and 18A of Sosma be amended as they were oppressive.

"There are several sections and clauses of Sosma which cannot be retained forever and should be given appropriate consideration (for review) from time to time.

“But for now, I have to say ‘no’ because I have been here (home ministry) for just two weeks,” Saifuddin said.

- Bernama > Malaysiakini, 15/12/2022



Sosma needed for national security, says Saifuddin Nasution


By TARRENCE TAN, MARTIN CARVALHO and RAHIMY RAHIM
Nation


Thursday, 16 Feb 2023 9:20 AM MYT




KUALA LUMPUR: The Security Offences (Special Measures) Act (Sosma) is still a relevant act to maintain national security and the government is committed to strengthen the law, says Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail.

He said Sosma is also important to maintain public order and the police need the law to take immediate action to avoid any threats to national sovereignty and harmony.


“The government is committed to improve the law to ensure national peace and security, but it has to be balanced with societal rights, as well as national peace and interests,” said Saifuddin in a written reply dated Feb 15.

Saifuddin said the ministry has held discussions and internal workshops to scrutinise suggestions to improve the law.

“Stakeholders, including NGOs, academics, community, and among others, will be involved in a feedback gathering session towards proposals to improve the law,” added Saifuddin.

Saifuddin was responding to RSN Rayer (PH-Jelutong), who asked the ministry to state steps taken to restudy provisions under Sosma that have received public criticisms.

In December last year, Saifuddin said the government had no intention of reviewing Sosma, which provides for preventive detention of up to 28 days.

Repealing Sosma was not among the pledges listed in Pakatan Harapan’s GE15 election manifesto.

Several DAP leaders have previously criticised Sosma as having draconian provisions.

Govt studying proposals to improve Sosma
Published:  Feb 22, 2023 11:12 AM
PARLIAMENT | Putrajaya is studying proposals to improve the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma), the Dewan Rakyat was told.

Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said his ministry was holding discussions and workshops to study the proposals.

"Interested parties including NGOs, academics, community groups and others are involved in the process," he said.

Saifuddin (above) was responding to a question from P Prabakaran (Harapan-Batu), who enquired if the government will abolish or review Sosma.

Sosma allowed for up to 28-day detention without trial for those suspected of "security offences" - which critics said was not clearly defined and thus subject to abuse.

Section 30 of the law has also attracted criticism because it allowed for a person tried under the law to be held in detention "pending exhaustion of the trial process".

In contrast, a murder suspect will enjoy freedom upon acquittal by the lower courts.

In December last year, Malaysiakini had reported on the plight of three dozen people who are still held under Sosma while pending trial under different laws.

Pakatan Harapan's manifesto does not promise any reforms for Sosma, but many Harapan MPs have urged Saifuddin to review the controversial law. - Malaysiakini, 22/2/2023