Showing posts with label 'shoot to kill'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'shoot to kill'. Show all posts

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Sarawak Police investigating police who shot person dead must be independent, and lead to suspects being openly tried in court, and not subject to internal ‘secret’ disciplinary action - No preferential treatment for police law-breakers especially in extrajudicial killings

Media Statement – 16/12/2021

Sarawak Police investigating police who shot person dead must be independent, and lead to suspects being openly tried in court, and not subject to internal ‘secret’ disciplinary action

No preferential treatment for police law-breakers especially in extrajudicial killings

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) applauds the fact that the police is investigating the killing  of a 24 year old man by the police in Sarawak for murder under the Penal Code  and offences under the Arms Act 1960. Later, one may be charged for murder, culpable homicide not amounting to murder or for some lesser killing offence.

Police who shot dead ‘suspect’ investigated for Murder

On 15/12/2021, a man driving a Proton Saga was shot dead by the police after he allegedly tried to evade and ram into the police along Jalan Simpang Tiga in Kuching, Sarawak. It was alleged the man had been instructed to stop for checks by the police for driving recklessly, but he  ignored the order and sped off, hitting several cars along the way before arriving at a traffic light junction in Jalan Simpang Tiga.

Another report said that the man driving a Proton Saga was said to be behaving in a suspicious manner and when instructed by police to stop, he drove his car at high speed towards them.

Another report suggested that the police already knew he was a wanted criminal suspect. There are contradictions in media reports, and the real truth is difficult to determine from media reports.

The only known truth seems to be that the man was shot dead by the police.

 ‘Sarawak Police Commissioner Datuk Aidi Ismail when contacted confirmed the case.,"Police will carry out a complete investigation into the case under Section 307 of the Penal Code and Section 8(a) of the Arms Act 1960," he said. The road was closed for more than five hours for the police to investigate the case, forcing motorists to use alternative routes.’(New Straits Times, 16/2/2021).

This reasonably means that the police is investigating the police officers who shot dead the victim, for it is nonsense for the police to be now investigating a dead victim.

In this case, MADPET sees no other option but to now charge the said suspected police officers for the killing of this person, and in court the accused police officers then will have every opportunity to raise whatever defenses including maybe ‘self defence’, and leave it to the court to decide on their guilt and/or innocence.

Police can only arrest not kill suspects

The police in Malaysia, under the law, is empowered to only arrest, and is permitted to use reasonable force to arrest – not kill as provided for in section 15 of the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code 199(Act 153)(CPC).

Only Police killing of only persons already accused of serious crimes whilst trying to arrest may be excusable under CPC

Section 15(3) CPC clearly states that ‘(3) Nothing in this section gives a right to cause the death of a person who is not accused of an offence punishable with death or with imprisonment for life.’

In this case, it seems clear that the said victim is certainly not a person ‘accused of an offence punishable with death or with imprisonment for life.’ If he was accussed, he would have already been charged in court, and so, at most, now he is merely a suspect, as such the killing of such suspects is not permissible in Malaysian law or the CPC.

Was the incident a pre-meditated or accidental encounter?

Media reports suggest that the police shot the victim dead allegedly because he tried to use his car to ram into the police, but there is no indication that the now deceased had used any firearms on the police. Another media report suggests this may have been a pre-meditated or planned police action to arrest the suspect of several crimes, and hopefully not to kill. Or was it merely a chance encounter by a police patrol unit? [Astro Awani 15/12/2021, Malay Mail 16/12/2021, Borneo Post 15/12/2021)

Public Prosecutor, SUHAKAM, EAIC and others to ensure independence of investigation/prosecution

MADPET urges a comprehensive and independent investigation of these police suspects, with no cover-ups or preferential treatment simply on the basis that the  suspects are police officers.

It is best that investigating officers are not from the same station or the same police district or even the police. It may be best if the Coroner and the Public Prosecutor are involved in the investigation from the onset.

MADPET also urges SUHAKAM (Malaysian National Human Rights Commission), and the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission(EAIC) to also closely monitor this case to ensure that there be an independent investigation and prosecution of said police officers.

MADPET urges the suspects to be charged and tried in court, and not be simply subject to some ‘secretive’ internal disciplinary action. Crimes must be punished in accordance to the law.

Government/Police Priority Is To Prove That It Was Not An Extra-Judicial Killing

If the said police officers were acting on orders and/or authorization of the police, then this would be extrajudicial killing. If they were acting in pursuance of their duties, it would again be extrajudicial killings.

However, if they were acting on their own at the behest(or orders) of another or for payment, then it may not extrajudicial killing but simple murder or an ordinary crime.

Truth must be revealed, and at present, it will be reasonable that it be presumed to be an extrajudicial killing, making it a priority for government and police to prove that it was not an extrajudicial killing.

There have been too many incidents of police shot alleged suspects or other innocent persons in Malaysia, where there was no closure – let alone proper independent investigations and/or prosecutions. Were they all extrajudicial killings?

Even in cases of death in custody, where SUHAKAM and/or the EAIC, after an proper inquiry found police officers criminally liable for the death of victims and/or other related offences like tampering of evidence, makes recommendations that they be charged in court, we have seen a failure of the government, police and/or the public prosecutor to charge and try them in criminal courts. It is embarrassing when thereafter, civil actions by the deceased’s families against the said officers and the police succeeds.

Recent SUHAKAM’s finding after public inquiries of enforced disappearance caused by police officers, have not yet to see any police officer being charged and tried in court.

This recent assurance by the Sarawak Police Commissioner of a thorough investigation of the police officers in this recent ‘shoot to kill’ incident gives us hope, that even police officers that committed crimes are not above the law, and will be investigated charged and tried.

MADPET reiterates the call for an independent investigation or re-investigation in all past ‘shoot to kill’ or extrajudicial killing incidents, as there is no limitation when it comes to crime, and the wrongdoers must be charged and accorded a fair trial in an open court. Secret disciplinary actions must be  avoided.

MADPET reiterates for the criminalization of extrajudicial killings in Malaysia;

MADPET also calls on the government to disclose statistics and information about all deaths by reason of police shootings, and the steps taken against the perpetrators.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

POLICE INVESTIGATING THE DEAD?

Sarawak Police Commissioner Datuk Aidi Ismail when contacted confirmed the case. "Police will carry out a complete investigation into the case under Section 307 of the Penal Code and Section 8(a) of the Arms Act 1960," he said.

Section 307 Penal Code -   Attempt to murder

Section 8(a) Arms Act 1960 - Any person who in contravention of the provisions of this Act-(a) has in his possession, custody or control, or carries or uses any arm or ammunition without an arms licence or arms permit in that behalf or otherwise than as authorized by the licence or permit or, in the case of ammunition, in quantities in excess of those so authorized; or...(b)...

 

Section 15 Criminal Procedure Code -  Arrest, how made

(1) In making an arrest the police officer or other person making the same shall actually touch or confine the body of the person to be arrested unless there is a submission to the custody by word or action.

(2) If such person forcibly resist the endeavour to arrest him or attempt to evade the arrest such officer or other person may use all means necessary to effect the arrest.

(3) Nothing in this section gives a right to cause the death of a person who is not accused of an offence punishable with death or with imprisonment for life.

Man shot dead after trying to ram cops near Kuching

KUCHING: A man was shot dead after he allegedly tried to evade and ram into the police along Jalan Simpang Tiga, here, last night.

It was learnt that the man, who was driving a Proton Saga, had been instructed to stop for checks by the police for driving recklessly.

The man, however, ignored the order and sped off, hitting several cars along the way before arriving at a traffic light junction in Jalan Simpang Tiga.

He was said to have tried to ram into the police when they attempted to approach the vehicle to apprehend him. This forced the police to open fire.

A team paramedics deployed to the scene confirmed that the man, 24, died on the spot.

Sarawak Police Commissioner Datuk Aidi Ismail when contacted confirmed the case.

"Police will carry out a complete investigation into the case under Section 307 of the Penal Code and Section 8(a) of the Arms Act 1960," he said.

The road was closed for more than five hours for the police to investigate the case, forcing motorists to use alternative routes. - NST, 16/12/2021

 

(UPDATED) Man believed shot dead after attempting to evade, ram cops in Kuching

Police investigating the old Proton Saga driven by the suspect.

KUCHING (Dec 15): A man was believed to have been shot dead after he allegedly attempted to evade and ram police personnel around 7.20pm at Jalan Simpang Tiga traffic light intersection here tonight.

It was said that the suspect, driving an old Proton Saga, had been ordered by the police to stop for checks.

He however disregarded the order and sped off, hitting several vehicles at the traffic light intersection.

Several police personnel tried to approach the vehicle to apprehend the suspect but he was said to have attempted to ram them to try to escape, which prompted the police to fire several shots at him.

Paramedics at the scene confirmed that the suspect had died.

Sarawak Police Commissioner Datuk Aidi Ismail in a statement later said the police had fired shots on the Proton Saga which was driven suspiciously and dangerously, in an attempt to stop it.

“Upon checks, paramedics have confirmed that the suspect, a local man around 24 years old, has died on the spot,” he said.

He said the case is being investigated under Section 307 of the Penal Code for attempted murder and Section 8(a) of the Arms Act 1960 for possessing or carrying arms and ammunition without an arms licence or permit. - Borneo Post, 15/12/2021

Man shot dead after trying to plow into cops in Kuching

Sources said police were forced to open fire when the suspect tried to run down several traffic policemen who attempted to apprehend him. — Picture by Ahmad Zamzahuri
Sources said police were forced to open fire when the suspect tried to run down several traffic policemen who attempted to apprehend him. — Picture by Ahmad Zamzahuri



KUCHING, Dec 16 — A motorist was shot dead after he allegedly tried to ram his car into a police patrol vehicle at the Jalan Simpang Tiga-Batu Lintang junction here last night.

In the 7.40pm incident, the man driving a Proton Saga was said to be behaving in a suspicious manner and when instructed by police to stop, he drove his car at high speed towards them.

It is understood that the suspect, whose identity has not been disclosed, hit several cars at the traffic light junction while trying to flee.

Sources said police were forced to open fire when the suspect tried to run down several traffic policemen who attempted to apprehend him.

Sarawak CID chief SAC Lukas Aket, when contacted, confirmed the incident. — Bernama - Malay Mail, 16/12/2021

 

Wanted Man Shot Dead In Kuching After He Tried To Escape From Police

My Post 2021 12 16T102230.893
Source: Sukan Star TV - sstv.my | Facebook

This incident took place after the man had realised that traffic officers were tailing him in a vehicle and tried to escape at a traffic light intersection. Several vehicles were damaged as the suspect collided into them in his attempt to flee custody.

When the officers from the Kuching District Police Headquarters tried to arrest the suspect, he fought back which caused the officers to fire several shots.Shot 3

The Borneo Post shared that the suspect is confirmed to be dead on the scene.

“Upon checks, paramedics have confirmed that the suspect, a local man around 24 years old, has died on the spot”, said Sarawak Police Commissioner Datuk Aidi Ismail.

Kuching folks, did you witness the incident? Let us know in the comment section. - World of Buzz, 16/12/2021

 

Polis tembak mati lelaki dikehendaki

Astro Awani
Polis tembak mati lelaki dikehendaki
Suspek adalah individu yang dikehendaki polis kerana terlibat dalam beberapa kes jenayah sebelum ini.
 
KUCHING: Seorang lelaki mati selepas ditembak polis di persimpangan Jalan Simpang Tiga - Batu Lintang, dekat sini sekitar jam 7.40 malam Rabu.
 
Suspek adalah individu yang dikehendaki polis kerana terlibat dalam beberapa kes jenayah sebelum ini.
 
Suspek dipercayai berasal dari Kampung Pinang Jawa, Kuching telah melanggar beberapa kenderaan dalam usahanya melarikan diri di persimpangan lampu isyarat di Jalan Simpang Tiga sebaik sahaja menyedari diekori polis. Astro Awani, 15/12/2021

 

 

 

Sunday, December 27, 2020

Police must arrest suspects, not shoot them dead(Malaysiakini)

 


LETTER | Police must arrest suspects, not shoot them dead

Charles Hector

Published
4

LETTER | Madpet (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) is appalled that four persons were shot dead on Christmas day by the Malaysian police, and they were allegedly not even armed with guns firing at the police.

This is yet another case of extrajudicial killing by the Malaysian police that ought to be independently investigated to determine that there was no wrongdoing on the part of the police.

The national news agency, Bernama, provides us with the police version of what happened, but this is simply not right.

It is best that an inquest is held by a judicial officer, the magistrate. The police should not be investigating cases where its own officers are the alleged killers or perpetrators of crime.

A police officer is duty-bound to only arrest suspects of crimes, who then will be investigated. If investigations reveal they have committed a crime, then suspects will be charged in court and the accused is accorded the right to a fair trial.

One is only guilty of any crime after the courts and after trial find the accused person guilty.

If the person to be arrested tries to avoid arrest or use force, then the law in section 15(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code states that ‘If such person forcibly resists the endeavours to arrest him or attempt to evade the arrest such officer or another person may use all means necessary to effect the arrest.’

The primary objective is to effect arrest not to kill the suspects.

Were the police shooting to effect the arrest or to kill? Could they have not shot and injured these suspects, in their 20s, and instead arrested them?

If one of the four suspects accidentally died, and the others were shot and arrested, it may be reasonable. But, yet again, all four suspects were shot dead – and not even one was arrested injured. So, no suspect can tell us their version of what happened.

Article 11(1) Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that ‘Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.’ 

In extrajudicial killings as in this case, at the very most they are but suspects – and as such they must always be presumed innocent.

As in some previous cases in Malaysia, after the killings, the police is quick to, maybe wrongly, ‘defame’ the dead, by making assertions such as “…Checks revealed that all the suspects, in their 20s, were members of a masked robbery gang that the police had been looking for. 

"We believe all the suspects had been involved in more than 50 robberies in Selangor since the beginning of this year and two of them had criminal records…”

In the determination of guilt, police suspicions and beliefs are irrelevant. It is for the court to determine whether a person is guilty or not.

It also is common for some of these news reports of a police shooting that resulted in deaths to say that arms and valuables are found in the vehicle.

“Inside the car, police found several machetes, jewellery, cash, some helmets and black clothes believed to be used by the suspects to carry out the robbery,” Bernama reported.

If they were previously long identified suspects, the question that arises is why were they earlier not arrested or even brought in for questioning? Were there arrest warrants issued before or in existence when they were killed?

Are the now reported ‘beliefs’ of the police true, or is it simply an attempted justification for the deaths?

The dead, obviously, do not have the capacity to now defend against these possibly ‘false’ allegations. Maybe, an independent inquiry will reveal the truth.

Would these deaths now mean that all these cases like the ’50 robberies in Selangor’ be considered closed? Is it possible that the four were innocent, and the real perpetrators are still at large? Now that a trial is avoided, will the police and prosecutors also be freed from having the burden of proving the guilt of the accused?

Another disturbing concern is the speed about the police suspicions of the involvement of the dead in past crimes gets reported, hours after they have been shot dead. If, the police came out with a statement of these past suspicions several days later, after spending some time investigating, it may be more plausible or believable.

It must be noted that past convictions of crimes are really irrelevant in determining whether one is guilty of a new and/or different crime.

The other possible justification for the police action in this Bernama report “…The police officers gave a chase and as they caught up, the suspect’s car rammed into a female GrabFood rider and dragged her for about a few metres.

“After running into the rider, the car could not go forward. The driver tried to ram the rider again prompting the police to fire several shots at the suspect’s car to save the victim,” Selangor Police acting chief Arjunaidi Mohamed told reporters at the scene.

The said female rider seems to have “…suffered injuries on several parts of her body and was taken to the Sungai Buloh Hospital for treatment…”

Would a speeding car that crashed into a motorbike cause more serious injuries or even death? Isn’t the testimony of the GrabFood rider important to determine the truth? Did the car try to ‘ram the rider again’? An independent inquiry is much needed to determine the truth.

Madpet demands speedy independent investigations and inquiries into all ‘police shot dead’ incidents, which is necessary to clear doubts of police wrongdoings and/or abuse of power. An open inquest by a judicial officer should also be held for all such police shooting incidents.

Madpet also urges police to arrest suspects and try the very best to avoid killing them.

Malaysia must end all forms of extrajudicial killings, and ensure every person is accorded the right to a fair trial. Until found guilty by a court of law, everyone must be presumed innocent.

The right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence principle also calls for the abolition of all Detention Without Trial Laws, where persons not tried or found guilty by the court are detained/restricted without even the ability to challenge in court the reasons used by the administration to detain/restrict them.


CHARLES HECTOR represents Malaysians Against Death Penalty & Torture (Madpet). - Malaysiakini, 27/12/2020

 

Saturday, December 26, 2020

Police Must Arrest Suspects, Not shoot them dead (MADPET)

 

Media Statement – 26/12/2020

Police Must Arrest Suspects, Not shoot them dead.

Inquest or Independent Inquiry for all police shot to death incidents

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) is appalled that 4 persons were shot dead on Christmas day by the Malaysian police, and they were allegedly not even armed with guns firing at the police.(Malay Mail, 25/12/2020).

This is yet another case of extrajudicial killing by the Malaysian police that ought to be independently investigated to determine that there was no wrongdoing on the part of the police.

The national news agency, BERNAMA, provides us with the police version of what happened, but this is simply not right.

It is best that an INQUEST be held by a Judicial Officer, the Magistrate. The police should not be investigating cases where its own officers are the alleged killers or perpetrators of crime.

A police officer is duty bound to only arrest suspects of crimes, who then will be investigated. If investigations reveal they have committed a crime, then suspects will be charged in court and  the accused is accorded the right to a fair trial.

One is only guilty of any crime after the courts, after trial, finds the accused person guilty.

If the person to be arrested tries to avoid arrest or use force, then the law in section 15(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code states that, ‘If such person forcibly resist the endeavors to arrest him or attempt to evade the arrest such officer or other person may use all means necessary to effect the arrest.’

The primary objective is to effect arrest, not to kill the suspects.

Were the police shooting to effect arrest or to kill? Could they have not shot and injured these suspects, in their 20s, and arrested them? If one of the 4 suspect accidently died, and the others were shot and arrested, it may be reasonable. But, yet again, all 4 suspects were shot dead – and not even one was arrested injured. So, no suspect can tell us their version of what happened.

Article 11(1) Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that ‘Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.’

In extrajudicial killings as in this case, at the very most they are but suspects – and as such they must always be presumed innocent.

As in some previous cases in Malaysia, after the killings, the police is quick to, maybe wrongly, ‘defame’ the dead, by making assertions like ‘..Checks revealed that all the suspects, in their 20s, were members of a masked robbery gang that the police had been looking for. “We believe all the suspects had been involved in more than 50 robberies in Selangor since the beginning of this year and two of them had criminal records…’

In the determination of guilt, police suspicions and beliefs are irrelevant. It is for the court to determine whether a person is guilty or not.

It also is common for some of these news reports of police shooting that resulted in deaths to say that arms and valuables are found in the vehicle. “Inside the car, police found several machetes, jewellery, cash, some helmets and black clothes believed to be used by the suspects to carry out robbery,”(BERNAMA)

If they were previously long identified suspects, the question that arises is why were they earlier not arrested or even brought in for questioning? Were there arrest warrants issued before or in existence when they were killed?

Are the now reported ‘beliefs’ of the police true, or is it simply an attempted justification for the deaths?

The dead, obviously, do not have the capacity to now defend against these possibly ‘false’ allegations. Maybe, an independent inquiry will reveal the truth.

Would these deaths now mean that all these cases like the ’50 robberies in Selangor’ be considered closed. Is it possible that the 4 were innocent, and the real perpetrators are still at large? Now that a trial is avoided, the police and prosecutors will also be freed of having the burden of proving the guilt of the accused?

One other disturbing concern, is the speed about the police suspicions of the involvement of the dead in past crimes gets reported, hours after they have been shot dead. If, the police came out with a statement of these past suspicions several days later, after spending some time investigating, it may be more plausible or believable.

It must be noted that past convictions of crimes is really irrelevant in determining whether one is guilty of a new and/or different crime.

The other possible justification for the police action in this BERNAMA report ‘…The policemen gave a chase and as they caught up, the suspect’s car rammed into a female GrabFood rider and dragged her for about a few metres.“After running into the rider, the car could not go forward. The driver tried to ram the rider again prompting the police to fire several shots at the suspect’s car to save the victim,” he[Selangor Police acting chief Datuk Arjunaidi Mohamed] told reporters at the scene. ‘ The said female rider seem to have ‘…suffered injuries on several parts of her body and was taken to the Sungai Buloh Hospital for treatment…’

Would a speeding car that crashed into a motorbike caused more serious injuries or even death? The testimony of the GrabFood women rider is important to determine the truth? Did the car try to ‘ram the rider again’? An independent inquiry is much needed to determine the truth.

MADPET demands speedy independent investigations and inquiries into all ‘police shot dead’ incidents, which is necessary to clear doubts of police wrongdoings and/or abuse of power. An open inquest by a judicial officer should also be held for all such police shooting incidents.

MADPET also urges police to arrest suspects, and try the very best to avoid killing them.

Malaysia must end all forms of extrajudicial killings, and ensure every person is accorded the right to a fair trial. Until found guilty by a court of law, everyone must be presumed innocent.

The right to a fair trial, and the presumption of innocence principle also calls for the abolition of all Detention Without Trial Laws, where persons not tried or found guilty by court are detained/restricted without even the ability to challenge in court the reasons used by the administration to detain/restrict them.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

See earlier posts

Inquest for all Police Shot Dead Victims To Ensure Also No Breach of Law by Police Extrajudicial Killing Must Be Criminalized in Malaysia 

Extrajudicial killings need speedy independent investigations, says Malaysian NGO(Online Citizen)

MADPET - Extrajudicial Killings Need Speedy Independent Investigations - 6 Reported Shot To Death By Police After Pakatan Harapan Became Government.

Another man with a machette shot and killed by police? Speedy INDEPENDENT inquiry needed?

 

Police shoot dead four suspected robbers who rammed into Grabfood rider while fleeing

Selangor police forensics personnel arriving at the scene after police shot dead four fleeing robbery suspects, on the highway at Sungai Buloh, December 25, 2020. — Picture courtesy of Twitter/Bernama
Selangor police forensics personnel arriving at the scene after police shot dead four fleeing robbery suspects, on the highway at Sungai Buloh, December 25, 2020. — Picture courtesy of Twitter/Bernama

SUNGAI BULOH, Dec 25 — Four men believed to have been involved in a robbery at a house in Rawang near here today, were shot dead by police while trying to escape.

Selangor Police acting chief Datuk Arjunaidi Mohamed said in the 1pm incident, a police team who received the information regarding the robbery had spotted a suspicious-looking Perodua Axia car and began tailing it to a road near Sungai Buloh Hospital.

The police ordered them to stop their car but they refused and sped off towards Jalan Kuala Selangor.

“The policemen gave a chase and as they caught up, the suspect’s car rammed into a female GrabFood rider and dragged her for about a few metres.

“After running into the rider, the car could not go forward. The driver tried to ram the rider again prompting the police to fire several shots at the suspect’s car to save the victim,” he told reporters at the scene.

Arjunaidi said one of the suspects got out of the car armed with a machete and the police had to fire a few more shots killing all the suspects at the scene.

Checks revealed that all the suspects, in their 20s, were members of a masked robbery gang that the police had been looking for.

“We believe all the suspects had been involved in more than 50 robberies in Selangor since the beginning of this year and two of them had criminal records.

“Inside the car, police found several machetes, jewellery, cash, some helmets and black clothes believed to be used by the suspects to carry out robbery,” he said, adding that the case was being investigated under Section 307 of the Penal Code.

Asked about the condition of the GrabFood rider, Arjunaidi said the victim suffered injuries on several parts of her body and was taken to the Sungai Buloh Hospital for treatment. — Bernama

 

 

 

Friday, June 01, 2018

Another man with a machette shot and killed by police? Speedy INDEPENDENT inquiry needed?

Police shoots and victim dies ...

“He came at them with a machete and they had to open fire to defend themselves, killing him,” he said.
This is what the police tells us - but, I and possibly many others may doubt the police version of events... Remember, the DUTY of the police is to ARREST - and, of course, when carrying out an arrest reasonable force can be used. 

In this case, a man allegedly carrying a machete...was the shooting him a use of reasonable force by the police? Did the police shoot with the intention to subdue and arrest? Or did they shoot with the intention to kill?

Police gives their 'version' - but, is it true? We really need an INDEPENDENT investigation - maybe by court, through an inquest or 'inquiry into the death' - which also decides whether there was any 'criminality' involved on the part of the police.

What does the new Pakatan Harapan say about this...what does Muhyiddin, our new Home Minister, which is also responsible for the police have to say?

What does the new ATTORNEY GENERAL advise be done?

If there is going to be an independent inquiry, it needs to be done fast? Should SUHAKAM or EAIC be given obligation to do this speedy investigation/inquiry in incidents where police shooting that resulted in death happens, where there are allegations of torture by the police, where there is death in custody??

 



Police shoot fake forex syndicate member dead


Monday, 21 May 2018

  • KUALA LUMPUR: A suspected member of a fake foreign currency exchange syndicate was shot dead and four others arrested in a late-night run-in with police in Ampang.

    The syndicate, known as Gang Gagak Hitam (Black Crow Gang), was in the midst of robbing a victim when police came upon them, leading to a high-speed pursuit.

    City police chief Comm Datuk Seri Mazlan Lazim said the syndicate offered unusually high exchange rates for US dollars to Malaysian ringgit in order to entice potential victims using social media.

    “They would lure their victims to a secluded spot and rob them.

    “In this case, they offered an exchange rate of 6.5 to a 28-year-old businessman, who wanted to exchange US$150,000,” he told a press conference at city police headquarters yesterday.

    Comm Mazlan said the businessman met two local men, who acted as middlemen for the exchange, at a five-star hotel in the city at about 10.30pm on Saturday.

    “They then introduced the businessman to an Arabian man, who drove him to another place on the pretence of making the exchange there.

    “The victim was driven to a secluded spot along Jalan Damai at about 1am, where four African men in another car arrived and ambushed them with machetes and a taser before taking the cash,” he said.
    A team of police officers who were patrolling the area spotted the robbery in progress.

    “They saw the Arabian man get out and jump into the second car with the four Africans. My men gave chase until Jalan Memanda 2, where the suspects got out of the car and tried to escape separately on foot,” he said.

    The team also split up and continued their pursuit.

    One of the suspects ran into an empty construction site and tried to attack two officers who were chasing him.

    “He came at them with a machete and they had to open fire to defend themselves, killing him,” he said.

    The Arabian and another African man were nabbed while two other suspects escaped with the cash.

    Police also arrested the two local middlemen to help with investigations.

    All four, aged between 28 and 50, have been remanded for four days.

    “We have been tracking this gang for a while now.

    “We have had 40 reports of similar cases since 2016 with losses of over RM12mil.

    “In fact, the team was patrolling the Jalan Damai area because that was the location where other similar cases took place, and we got lucky,” Comm Mazlan said.

    He urged the public to refrain from being enticed to exchange currencies for a higher rate on the black market.

    “You may find yourself losing all your money just because of greed,” he added.

    Police are tracking the two syndicate members still at large. - Star, 21/5/2018