Showing posts with label HR Violations - Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HR Violations - Police. Show all posts

Friday, April 17, 2020

Release 5 Mongolian Women, Victims and/or Witnesses of Rape by Policeman, as laws allows it Immediately charge and speedily try perpetrators whose victims are foreign nationals(MADPET)


Media Statement – 17/4/2020

Release 5 Mongolian Women, Victims and/or Witnesses of Rape by Policeman, as laws allows it

Immediately charge and speedily try perpetrators whose victims are foreign nationals

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) is appalled to hear that 5 Mongolian women, 2 being alleged victims of rape and/or kidnapping by a police officer, and 3 other potential witnesses, are all now being detained under Interim Protection Orders as the police believe they are victims of human trafficking. 

These 5 women must be immediately released with the right to stay and work in Malaysia until the rape trial is completed. Too many perpetrators of crime escape simply because the victims and/or witnesses being foreign nationals, are no more in Malaysia.

It was reported that ‘..a police inspector has been arrested for allegedly raping two Mongolian women aged 20 and 37 years old after he stopped them at a movement control order (MCO) roadblock here…’(12/4/2020). The ‘… women were stopped at the roadblock at 8pm on Friday and held in the hotel room for more than 24 hours before the police team rescued them…’ based on a tip-off. The police said that ‘…the case may also be possibly investigated for kidnap and extortion.

Thereafter, it was reported that 3 ‘…other Mongolian women have been detained after they lodged a police report in relation to the alleged rape of two fellow female nationals by a police inspector….’(Malaysiakini, 14/4/2020). They were allegedly ‘…the ones who raised the alarm over the alleged rape…’

It was alleged that ‘…on April 10, the police arrived at the scene and asked the three women to go to a police station to lodge a police report over the incident, which they did and returned home afterwards….’. Then, on April 11 when the police went to the three women’s house and arrested them.

Interim Protection Orders (21 days) and Protection Orders (3 months), then Deportation?

The 2 alleged victims and the 3 witnesses, allegedly undocumented foreigners, have now been arrested under the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 on the basis that they may be human trafficking victims.

They are currently being detained under an Interim Protection Order, which can last for up to 21 days.
Thereafter, if the Magistrate is satisfied that he/she is a trafficked person and in need of care and protection, a Protection Order for a period not exceeding three months can be made. 

After that, for foreign victims of human trafficking, they are handed over to the Immigration Department who will then process and usually deport them, just like any other undocumented migrants.

Law Provides Option To Release And Allow Them To Stay And Work Legally In Malaysia

However, there is an OPTION under this anti—trafficking law that will allow them their freedom to live and to work legally until the end of the trial.

The Anti-Trafficking In Persons And Anti-Smuggling Of Migrants (Permission To Move Freely And To Work) (Foreign National) Regulations 2016 allows them to not only be released immediately to be able to move around freely but to make it possible for them to work in Malaysia for at least 3 years.

This would be a the best and just solution, as this will ensure that these victims and witnesses, will all be available here in Malaysia for the trial of the said police officer – hence giving the authorities no reason for not charging and/or trying the perpetrator in court. Often, the unavailability of witnesses is one of the reasons why some perpetrators are never even charged, or if already charged, the case is discontinued and the alleged perpetrator is freed.

Best For Victims And Witnesses To Be Present At Trials To Ensure Fair Trial

There is a provision for the recording of evidence of trafficked person, whereby such evidence recorded is admissible in court, and the ‘..weight to be attached to such evidence shall be the same as that of a witness who appears and gives evidence in the course of a proceeding. ..’(Section 52 of the Anti-Trafficking Act). One wonders whether this will also apply to rape cases, and not just for anti-trafficking crimes.

However, such use of pre-recorded statements undermine the accused person’s right to a fair trial, as he/she would be denied the right to question the witnesses in court. The court will also be denied the opportunity of seeing and accessing the credibility of the witness.

To ensure justice be done, it is always important and best for the alleged victim/s and witnesses to be present personally in court to give evidence in court during trial.

No Reason To Delay Charging and Trial

In this case, there is really no reason to not speedily charge the suspect police officer, and conduct the trial speedily when all the Mongolian victim and witnesses are still in Malaysia.

The arresting of the alleged victims and taking them not to the police station, but some other place during the MCO period may be a crime.

Evidence of rape and the crime scene should have already all been collected, as reported in the media.
The witnesses are available, and what they saw and heard are still fresh in their mind. The trial could be expedited, and it could be over even in a couple of weeks.

On 16/1/2020, it was reported that the ‘…police have applied to extend a remand order against an inspector over rape allegations…’ MADPET fails to see the reason or justification for the procrastination. He should be charged and the trial out to be commenced and ended speedily, when the victims and relevant witnesses are still here in Malaysia. This would be just when it comes to situation when the victims and/or witnesses are foreign nationals, who may want to return home as soon as possible.

Poor Track Record Of Charging And Trying Police In Court

In the past, Malaysia sadly have a poor track record of prosecuting and charging police officers and other enforcement officers in court, even in cases after Royal Commission of Inquiries, Inquiries by Suhakam (Malaysian National Human Rights Commission) and Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) have found wrongdoings and/or even recommended prosecution. This happened, amongst others, in the Bright Sparklers case, enforced disappearance cases of Pastor Koh and Amri Che Mat, and in the death in police custody cases of Syed Mohd Azlan Syed Mohamed Nur and N. Dharmendran.

Reform Needed For Cases Where Victims Are Foreign Nationals

In Hong Kong, migrant worker victims who have a claim or a case, are provided housing and board until the end of their cases, to ensure justice be done. Malaysia should also have a similar law, to ensure the perpetrators of crime against and violators of rights of migrants, do not escape unpunished simply because these migrants have been deported and/or are no longer in Malaysia.

Victims, be they Malaysians or foreign nationals, deserve JUSTICE.

MADPET calls for the speedy prosecution, charging and trial of the suspected police officer in court;

MADPET calls for the immediate release of the 2 Mongolian women victims, and the 3 Mongolian women witnesses from detention, and that they be immediately released and also allowed to stay and work legally in Malaysia until the speedy completion the rape/kidnapping trial;

MADPET calls for no special treatment to be accorded to police officers and/or other enforcement officers who broke the law, and that they should all be charged and tried in open court, and not simply some internal discipline procedure;

MADPET also calls for speedy trials and/or adjudication when the victims and/or witnesses are foreign nationals, while facilitating and supporting their stay in Malaysia pending completion of trials, to ensure that perpetrators of crime and/or violators of rights do not escape justice by reason of unavailability of witnesses and/or victims in Malaysia;

Charles Hector
For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)


See also the following post, which also looks at the relevant law mentioned in Media Statement above that allows all these Mongolian women to be freed immediately, and even to work legally Mongolian Rape Victim and Witnesses Detained? Deported soon? Will Police Officer be charged and tried in court?



3 Mongolian women detained after reporting cop for alleged rape of 2 others

 

Hidir Reduan Abdul Rashid
Published
Modified 7:39 am

Three Mongolian women have been detained after they lodged a police report in relation to the alleged rape of two fellow female nationals by a police inspector, said their counsel Mathew Thomas Philip.

Speaking to Malaysiakini today, the lawyer confirmed that the Mongolian Consulate hired his legal firm Thomas Philip (Advocates and Solicitors) and that they will be filing an application to release the three Mongolian women.

According to the lawyer, the three women were the ones who raised the alarm over the alleged rape of the other two Mongolian nationals by a police inspector.

It was reported that on April 11, the police arrested an inspector over the suspected rape of two Mongolian women. The police officer was detained at a movement control order (MCO) roadblock in Petaling Jaya.

Philip said the Petaling Jaya Magistrate’s Court today allowed an application by the police for a 21-day interim protection order against the trio as part of an investigation into human trafficking.

The lawyer said his legal team will be filing an application this week to set aside the interim protection order, which restricted the three women’s movements as they would be confined to a safehouse.

He said the Mongolian Consulate was shocked at the detention of the three women, adding that the interim protection order application by the police was made for them to investigate human trafficking, when in fact the trio had lodged a police report over the alleged rape of the two other Mongolian women.

“We have instructions to (file an application to) set aside the interim protection order. The (Mongolian) Consulate was shocked at what happened to the three women.

“Today, we initially thought we were going to the (Magistrate’s) Court because of an interim protection order related to the rape (investigation).

"But suddenly, we were told that the interim protection order was for (police investigation into) human trafficking.

“It was just a case of the three women going to help (the Mongolian victims) and suddenly they found themselves under the interim protection order.

“The Mongolian Consulate said the three women need not be under the interim protection order in relation to human trafficking,” he said, adding that the police claimed that the three women are considered victims in the human trafficking case.

He said that his lawyers during today’s proceedings had raised an objection to the interim order application as being baseless, because the root matter is the alleged rape of the other two Mongolian women by the police inspector, with no element of human trafficking.


Philip claimed that the two victims were allegedly kidnapped at a police roadblock on April 9, then on April 10 the three women texted in a group chat seeking help and subsequently contacted the police.

The lawyer explained that on April 10, the police arrived at the scene and asked the three women to go to a police station to lodge a police report over the incident, which they did and returned home afterwards.

It was on April 11 when the police went to the three women’s house and arrested them, he said. 

“The three women do not feel the interim protection order is necessary for protection. They just want to go home (to Mongolia) and for the Consulate to ensure their safety,” he said.

Philip added that the matter has been exacerbated by the three women’s complaint that their personal information has somehow been leaked to social media following their arrest.

“They are more fearful, they came to help the two Mongolian women and then they get put under an interim protection order and then the information on their smartphones were released.

“Some photos of them at the police station were circulated on social media. They are asking how that could have happened,” Philip said. - Malaysiakini, 14/4/2020

Police inspector arrested for alleged rape of two Mongolian women after they were stopped at MCO roadblock in PJ



Petaling Jaya police chief Nik Ezanee Mohd Faisal speaks to reporters during a press conference in Petaling Jaya April 12, 2020. — Picture by Miera Zulyana
Petaling Jaya police chief Nik Ezanee Mohd Faisal speaks to reporters during a press conference in Petaling Jaya April 12, 2020. — Picture by Miera Zulyana
PETALING JAYA, April 12 — A police inspector has been arrested for allegedly raping two Mongolian women aged 20 and 37 years old after he stopped them at a movement control order (MCO) roadblock here. 

In the Friday night incident, the two women claimed that they were stopped at a roadblock in the district while they were on their way home in a car they hired through the e-hailing app Grab.

Upon finding out that the two victims had no valid travel documents on them, the inspector reportedly took advantage of the situation and forcefully took them to a nearby hotel where he allegedly raped them. 

Petaling Jaya Police chief ACP Nik Ezanee Mohd Faisal said, acting on a tip-off, a police team led by PJ deputy police chief Supt Ku Mashariman Ku Mahmood raided the boutique hotel and rescued the two women. 

“The police inspector aged 30 was arrested and has been remanded today for five days to facilitate investigations. 

“The case is being investigated under Section 376(3) of the Penal Code for rape,” he said during a press conference this afternoon. 

Nik Ezanee said the police are also looking at other elements and may bring up more charges against the suspect as the case may also be possibly investigated for kidnap and extortion. 

“Right now, there are elements of rape. We are also looking at other charges as well.

“The victims have no valid travel documents. There are possibilities that the women are involved in the illicit sex trade but I want to make it clear that, in this case, they are the victims,” he said. 

Nik Ezanee said the suspect had kept the two women in the hotel room against their will. 

It was learnt that the women were stopped at the roadblock at 8pm on Friday and held in the hotel room for more than 24 hours before the police team rescued them. 

He said the two victims have been sent for a medical examination and will be placed under an interim protection order (IPO)

“The two women are unable to speak English or Malay so we had to use a translator who is a friend of the two victims,” he said. 

A police forensic unit was sent to the hotel room where forensic investigations were carried out. 

“I want to say that we view this case seriously. I am disappointed with the action of the policeman who acted in his own capacity and we will ensure that the stern action based on existing laws will be taken against him,” he said. - Malay Mail, 12/4/2020





  

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

SUARAM URGENT APPEAL: RELEASE AHMAD ABDUL JALIL IMMEDIATELY



Inline image 1


6 NOVEMBER 2012
 
URGENT APPEAL: RELEASE AHMAD ABDUL JALIL IMMEDIATELY

SUARAM refers to one Ahmad Abdul Jalil, 27, was arrested on 2nd November 2012 for allegedly posted a defamatory statement on Sultan of Johor. He has been remanded for 3 days at Johor Bahru and on 5th November 2012,  the police's application to extend the remand period was rejected by the Johor Bahru Magistrate who has stated that the act of transferring Ahmad from Kuala Lumpur to Johor was unreasonable and there were no statements taken from Ahmad while he was remanded for the past 3 days.

Ahmad's family members were not allowed to see him since 2nd November 2012. Officer in charge of the investigation ACP Azizan explained to the family that this is the standard operating procedure of the police. It is basic knowledge that Section 28A of the Criminal Procedure Code states that an arrested person shall be given the opportunity to communicate with his family members and to inform on his whereabouts. The reason of claiming standard operating procedure reflects the ignorance and arrogance of ACP Azizan, the designated officer for Ahmad's case.

Ahmad is currently being investigated under section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948, believed to be for having made seditious remarks against the Sultan of Johor on his Facebook page. Section 4(1) stipulates that any person who utters prints or publishes any seditious words, on conviction, would be liable for a first offence to a fine not exceeding RM5, 000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to both. 

On 5th November 2012, upon the rejection of the police's remand application, Ahmad was REARRESTED by  plainclothes policemen outside the court room for alleged offences under the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. Ahmad's father was told that Ahmad was rearrested because the family has engaged with lawyers.  SUARAM is appalled at the actions of the police which goes against basic fundamental rights enshrined under S5(3) of the Federal Constitution which allows an arrested person to communicate with a lawyer of his choice. A family member who declined to be known stated that the police acting under pressure and instructions from the top.

The bad practice of re-arresting an individual for different offenses upon the failure of an initial charge shows the motive-based prosecution method applied by the police. An arrested person shall not be bullied in such a way and that his/her rights must not be denied simply for the fact that the highest law in the country guarantees them.
 
Malaysia's poor records on civil liberties and human rights at the international standards is widely known. It does not bolster the country's image by adopting bad practices which completely drains all available space for the exercise of fundamental human rights and civil liberties. 

SUARAM hereby demands that Ahmad Abdul Jalil be released immediately. 

Released by,

Thevarajan
Right to Justice Coordinator
SUARAM

What can you do?

Urgent action needed:

Please write protest letters to the government and the police to express your strongest condemnation of the arrests of Ahmad Abdul Jalil which denies his right to speech and the right to be represented by lawyer.

SAMPLE LETTER
[Letterhead of your organisation]
Inspector-General of Police
Tan Sri Ismail Omar,
Ibu Pejabat Polis Diraja Malaysia,
50560 Bukit Aman,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Tel: +603 2262 6015
Fax: +603 2272 5613

Dear Sir,

Re: Release Ahmad Abdul Jalil Now!

We are writing to you, once again, to express our outrage and our strongest condemnation over the arrest of Ahmad Abdul Jalil for a post in Facebook deemed seditious by the government.

We are appalled by the Malaysian government and the police's latest actions and view this as yet another attempt to intimidate Malaysian citizens from practicing freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Denying his right for a counsel is also an outrageous act against the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. We demand the government to release Ahmad Abdul Jalil immediately.

We strongly urge you, once again, to stop bringing shame to Malaysia, a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council. We would like to remind that freedom of speech is guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

Yours sincerely,

[Name]


Cc To:

1. Dato' Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak,
Prime Minister of Malaysia,
Prime Minister's Office,
Main Block, Perdana Putra Building,
Federal Government Administrative Centre,
62502 Putrajaya , MALAYSIA
Tel: 603-8888 8000 Fax: 603-8888 3444
E-Mail: ppm@pmo.gov.my

2. Dato’ Seri Hishamuddin bin Tun Hussein
Minister of Home Affairs Malaysia
Blok D1 & D2, Kompleks D
Pusat Pentadbiran
Kerajaan Persekutuan
62546 Putrajaya  
Tel: 03 8886 8000/ 3000
Fax: 03-88891613/03-88891610

3. Tan Sri Hasmy Agam,
Chairman,
Malaysian Human Rights Commission,
Level 11, Menara TH Perdana,
Jalan Sultan Ismail,
50250 Kuala Lumpur.
Tel: 03 26125600 Fax: 03 26125620

4.  Mr. Frank La Rue
Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland
Fax: +41 22 917 9006
Email: freedex@ohchr.or

5. Ms. Margaret Sekaggya,
Special Rapporteur on the situation on human rights defenders,
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)




--
Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)
433A, Jalan 5/46, Gasing Indah,
46000, Petaling Jaya,
Selangor
Malaysia
Tel: +603 77843525
Fax: +603 77843526
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/suararakyatmalaysia
Twitter:
SUARAMtweets

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Nude squats again... Torture by police during detention needs more than guidelines..

Torture by police during detention needs more than guidelines..

Well, after the expose of the 'nude squat' incident (in 2005, I believe) and the numerous deaths in custody incidences which points to the possibility of occurrence of torture involving police or other enforcement officers, which led to amendments in Malaysia's law and the introduction of guidelines, we all expected that such incidences will no more be happening in Malaysia - but alas it still seem to be continuing.

Previously, such 'torture' after arrest may have been to get suspects to confess their crime - but then after the Criminal Procedure Code was amended, such statements and/or confessions can no longer be used to get convictions, so, why is torture  is still happening...(Now, such statements could be used only if the person is charged for making false statements...)

113.  Admission of statements in evidence. (Criminal Procedure Code)
(1) Except as provided in this section, no statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of a police investigation made under this Chapter shall be used in evidence.
(2) When any witness is called for the prosecution or for the defence, other than the accused, the court shall, on the request of the accused or the prosecutor, refer to any statement made by that witness to a police officer in the course of a police investigation under this Chapter and may then, if the court thinks fit in the interest of justice, direct the accused to be furnished with a copy of it and the statement may be used to impeach the credit of the witness in the manner provided by the Evidence Act 1950 [Act 56].
(3) Where the accused had made a statement during the course of a police investigation, such statement may be admitted in evidence in support of his defence during the course of the trial.
(4) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement made in the course of an identification parade or falling within section 27 or paragraphs 32(1)(a), (i) and (j) of the Evidence Act 1950.

(5) When any person is charged with any offence in relation to-

(a) the making; or (b) the contents, of any statement made by him to a police officer in the course of a police investigation made under this Chapter, that statement may be used as evidence in the prosecution's case.
The problem is that those guilty of abusing their power and torturing have not been taken to task, charged and tried in an open court, and, if found guilty given a deterrent sentence. 

The problem is that we still do not CCTV with recording capabilities at all places in the police station, so that it will be easy to identify the alleged perpetrators.

The problem is that what has been recommended by 2 Royal Commissions, that is an Independent Police Complaints and Misconducts Commission, where victims could go and complaint about police misconduct was not set up by the government. To go complaint to the police about torture and/or wrongdoing of police or other enforcement personnel will not work - as the general impression is that police will protect fellow police officers, and the complainant may end up being charged with making a false report/complaint, and when it comes to witnesses, most of the time there is that one victim, and so many police officers (or others who will not go against the police for fear of repercussions..)

What about SUHAKAM? Yes, you could lodge the complaint there - but all SUHAKAM can do is investigate and then make recommendations. They do not have the power yet to prosecute the wrongdoer. Maybe, it is time we gave SUHAKAM that power..But, even with SUHAKAM, the problem is the persons appointed as Commissioners, and for a public inquiry on a complaint it requires a majority (or is it two thirds) of the Commissioners to support it, so that is why we have so little public inquiries being conducted by SUHAKAM. It still remains a 'toothless tigers' - and even the few good Commissioners can't do much for so long as the Chairman and the majority are too scared to act especially when the person complaint against is a government or public servant.

State governments, I believe can set up their own 'Commissions', committees, etc to investigate alleged human rights violations that happen in their own state - but they too have not taken steps in that direction. 

What about Parliament? Parliamentary select committees?  ...or similar structures in State legislative assemblies. 

Political will - this is what we need but alas our BN government is not really interested in such matters like human rights, and is more interested in matters of a financial nature.

Nude squats are wrong - more importantly, we have get rid of 'torture' - and, it is not enough everytime a case gets the media attention, for the Minister to react and set up some 'multi-agency inquiry' - let's have a couple of MPs/Senators from both the government and opposition in this inquiry panel as well..to give it credibility. Maybe some persons from SUHAKAM and the Bar as well..

The Home Ministry has ordered a multi-agency inquiry into the nude squat complaint involving two Singaporeans last week.

NONEMinister Hishammuddin Hussein said the inquiry will involve at least the Immigration Department and the police, and expects that it will start today.

"We have to get to the bottom of it," he told a press conference at the Parliament lobby today.

Hishammuddin said it is not common practice for immigration officers to order suspected illegal immigrants to perform nude squats.

He however declined to elaborate on the issue, saying that it is best to wait for the outcome of the inquiry.
Last week, Singaporean Chinese daily Lianhe Zaobao reported that the two women were detained on suspicion of being illegal immigrants after they forgot to stamp their passports en route to Johor Baru for supper on June 9.

The pair were detained at a lock-up in Pontian, where they were allegedly told to strip and perform 10 squats naked before they were given clothes meant for detainees and held for 24 hours.

Hishammuddin evaded numerous questions on the details of the incident, repeatedly stressing that it will all be made known once the inquiry is completed and a report is submitted.

'Not handled by frontliners'

He however defended the Immigration officers manning the immigration checkpoint, stating that the alleged incident was not handled by the department's “frontliners”.

“The way the issue has played out is as if it was committed by the frontliners, but it is wrong to say it was (done by) immigration frontliners. The incident happened at the detention depot,” he said.

Hishammuddin acknowledged that there may be a need to revamp the department's standard operating procedures (SOP), but stressed that any decision to do so must be based on the results of the inquiry.

“(Immigration officers') actions are based on SOP. If (the SOP) does not fulfil the atmosphere and situation of today, then it needs to be changed but it must be based on the investigations,” he said.

Last week's nude squat issue is the second such incident to hit Malaysian shores, after a short video clip made its rounds in 2005 depicting a nude woman doing squats while in police custody.

The incident eventually led to a royal commission of inquiry that came up with a list of recommendations and the mooting of an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC).- Malaysiakini, 15/6/2011, Hisham: Immediate inquiry into Nude Squat II



Thursday, April 01, 2010

Victim of Police Shooting still seeking justice - Malaysian police can shoot injure/kill the innocent and will not be penalised (or the victim compensated)?


Norizan Salleh, a 30-year-old single mother who was mistakenly shot five times by police officers last year, finally got her wish to take her grouses to Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein.

NONENorizan (right in photo) plans to sue the police force for the serious injuries inflicted by the gunshots when she was travelling in a car with friends on Oct 30, 2009.

She had earlier sought a meeting with the minister to hand over a protest memorandum, but this was turned down.

Accompanied by her lawyer N Surendran, Norizan spoke to Hishammuddin in his office in Parliament for about 10 minutes demanding for justice over the ordeal she had suffered.

During her visit at about 10.20 am, Norizan handed a memorandum to Hishammuddin demanding an investigation against the police officers who shot her.

Hishammuddin did not comment on the matter but a statement was read to reporters by his parliamentary secretary, Markiman Kobiran, said that he will look into the matter and get feedback from the police.
The home minister had told Parliament last month that the Attorney-General's Chambers found no reason to pursue the matter.

"The case has been investigated under Section 307 of the Penal Code for attempted murder. The investigation papers have been sent to the deputy public prosecutor who decided not to take any further action on the case."
'Gun pointed at me'

Prior to her meeting, Norizan told reporters that she has no criminal record and criticised the police for their “brutal” treatment and for refusing to foot her RM18,000 medical bill.

NONERecalling the Oct 30 incident, Norizan said she was seated at the back of a vehicle along the Middle Right Road II in Gombak when a police patrol car rode abreast.

She said when she turned to look at the patrol car, she saw a police personnel pointing a gun at her and she immediately ducked. A hail of gunfire followed.

"When we pulled over and I realised I had been shot. The most serious wounds were to my right arm which was shattered by two bullets while another was lodged in the middle of my chest, narrowly missing my heart."

Two more bullets had grazed her arm and torso.

When her vehicle came to a stop, Norizan said she crawled out of the car and she was kicked and stomped on by a police personnel. She claimed that they were from the Sentul district police headquarters.

She later learned from the police personnel that the car she was traveling in was reported stolen in Alor Setar, Kedah.

Following this, Norizan was at the Kuala Lumpur general hospital and National Heart Institute for 12 days where she underwent numerous surgeries to remove the bullets.

She claims that she was told by hospital staff that the police had classified her case as a road accident.
'They were unarmed'
Previous news reports said the car was fitted with a false registration plate and had dangerous weapons such as axes, machetes, knives, falsified road tax stickers and several car keys were found in the vehicle.

The male suspects in the vehicle were later charged in court for the possession of dangerous weapons, obstructing the police from carrying out their duties and failing to produce their identity cards.

Norizan and another female occupant are witnesses in the case.

She has since approached the Bukit Aman Police Headquarters, human rights commision (Suhakam) and MCA complaints' bureau to demand justice and compensation to no avail.

Surendran said his client has no other recourse than to sue the police for damages and to ensure that they be punished for the incident.

"(Imagine) our shock and disappointment despite clear evidence of wrongdoings... the home minister said that the police acted properly," said Surendran.

He added that laws are clear that police can only shoot if there indication of actual danger to them.

"But these were unarmed people... what's the justification? It's a false story by the police, they said they acted in self-defence and said that her car was trying to ram theirs.

"But I can provide evidence because their car was fired on from the back... how could they say they were trying to ram the police while the shots were fired from the back?” he asked.

Minister shows no remorse

Parliamentarians Tian Chua (PKR - Batu), Charles Santiago (DAP - Klang), S Manikavasagam (PKR - Kapar) and Zuraidah Kamaruddin (PKR - Ampang) also lashed out at the authorities for their indifference.

"The minister did not take any responsibility (and has) no remorse. I hope this is not an isolated cause because there have been many times concerning police abuse of power and violence," said Chua.

Zuraidah, on the other hand, praised the Selangor government, which donated RM10,000 to Norizan for her medical expenses.

Santiago added that it is appalling that the government had turned its back on Norizan and others who had suffered at the hands of the authorities.

"She needs justice. Set up inquiry and ensure the culprits face the music," he said.

Earlier, the government had decided not to take action against the Police and the policemen involved...

The government has reiterated its refusal to take action against the police for mistakenly shooting 30-year-old single mother Norizan Salleh five times.

Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein told the Dewan Rakyat that the Attorney-General's Chambers found no reason to pursue the matter.

NONE"The case has been investigated under Section 307 of the Penal Code, for attempted murder. The investigation papers have been sent to the deputy public prosecutor, who decided not to take any further action over the case."

Hishammuddin was replying to a question from Teluk Intan MP M Manogaran, who inquired if any disciplinary or legal action were taken against the police officers involved.

Elaborating, Hishammuddin said it was found that Norizan was in the company of others who were allegedly committing a crime.

"The police had to open fire as the suspects tried to ram into a police vehicle, despite being ordered to halt. Norizan was hit by bullet fragments.

"Furthermore, police investigations have concluded that the suspect's vehicle was reported to have been stolen," he said.

During the incident along the Middle Ring Road II in Kuala Lumpur last October, Norizan miraculously survived five gunshot wounds.

She claimed that she was later dragged out of the car and further assaulted, resulting in a broken rib.

The incident left Norizan with a permanently damaged hand. A bullet lodged close to her heart was also removed. The incident left her with RM18,000 medical bill.

She later took her case to the the Human Rights Commission and federal police headquarters for action against the police personnel involved but her complaints have fallen on deaf ears.


Norizan even tried to set an appointment with Hishammuddin to air her grouses but the latter has refused to meet her.- Malaysiakini, 25/3/2010, Hisham: No action against Norizan's shooters