Tuesday, September 01, 2020

MADPET calls for abolition of mandatory minimum sentences for Drunk Driving - 7 years for injury, 10 years for death?

 

Media  Statement – 1/9/2020

Abolish Minimum Mandatory Prison Sentence 

for Drunk Driving

Ensure one offence in Malaysian laws, not same offences under different

laws carrying different penalties

 

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) calls for the removal of mandatory minimum prison sentence in the Road Transport Act 1987(RTA), that imposes high sentences on drunk drivers that cause death or injury, and ask that sentencing discretion be left with the judges and courts. The mandatory minimum prison term being proposed by the Bill to amend the the RTA  is 10 years if death is caused, and 7 years if injury is caused.

It will be a great injustice for someone that caused a minor injury to be imprisoned for the minimum 7 years.

Parliament should leave sentencing discretion to the judges, who after hearing a particular case will determine an appropriate and just sentence taking into consideration all factors.

Road Transport (Amendment) Bill 2020

The Road Transport (Amendment) Bill 2020, was passed in the Dewan Rakyat on 26/8/2020, and it will now be tabled at the Senate for approval, and thereafter be sent to the King for royal assent, before it becomes law.

Section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act will be amended to read; ‘…(1) Any person who, when driving a motor vehicle on  a  road  or  other  public  place—(a)  is under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drug, to such an extent as to be incapable of having  proper  control  of  the  motor  vehicle;  or(b)  has  so  much  alcohol  in  his  body  that  the  proportion of it in his breath, blood or urine exceeds  the  prescribed  limit, and  causes  the  death  of  any  person  shall  be  guilty  of  an offence and shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment  for  a  term  of  not  less  than  ten  years  and not more than fifteen years…’ For causing injury to  any  person  ‘…with  imprisonment  for  a  term  of  not  less  than  seven  years  and  not  more  than  ten  years…’

This law will covers persons who are drunk with alcohol, and those who are on drugs.

There are very serious crimes like corruption and abuse of power that affect all Malaysians badly, and comparatively it may be unjust to sentence a first time drunk driving offender for causing injury to another. For corruption, a former Prime Minister was just sentenced 6 years, for each of the 4 conviction, but if the RTA amendment is passed, a drunk driver that causes injury not death, at the very least will be sentenced to 7 years. Surely corruption and abuse of power by Ministers and public servants requires a higher deterrent sentence.

Alcoholism and drug abuse is a disease. Intoxication is condition of having physical or mental control markedly diminished by the effects of alcohol or drugs, and is also now a recognized defence in criminal law. A period of rehabilitation may be a better remedy to alcohol and/or drug addicts, even when in a state of intoxication they kills or injures another.

No Minimum Mandatory Sentence – Leave Sentencing Discretion to Judges

Whilst Parliament may set the maximum sentence for particular crimes, it should never oust judicial power when it comes to sentencing by the imposition of a mandatory minimum prison sentence.

Judges and courts should be trusted to decide on the sentences, after considering relevant facts of each case.

Penal Code already have offences for causing death or Injury

Note that the Penal Code today provides for the offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, the sentence of ‘…with imprisonment for a term which may extend to thirty years…’ if there was intend to cause death, and ‘…imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years.. if the act is done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause death, but without any intention to cause death…’. The other offence of causing death by negligence stipulates that anyone who ‘causes the death of any person, by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years’

For voluntarily causing hurt, the punishment is ‘…imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to two thousand ringgit or with both…’ Those who ‘…voluntarily causes grievous hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine…’

Note that, in all these Penal Code offences of causing death and/or injury, Parliament rightfully does not set any mandatory minimum prison sentence but just the maximum penalty, leaving judges the discretion to impose a reasonable and just sentence.

The Penal Code already does cover offences of causing injury or death committed by persons under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and as such there is really no need to create or maintain such offences under the Road Transport Act.

Drunk Driver that killed – One charged for Murder, another for Road Traffic Offence?

On 1/6/2020, it was reported that an alleged drunk driver that caused another’s death was charged for murder, under section 302 of the Penal Code, that carries the mandatory death penalty(1/6/2020, New Straits Times).

Another report of a drunk driver that caused death was being investigated under section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act, and if he was charged and convicted would face a sentence of sentence of imprisonment of not less than 3 years and not more than 7 years.(The Rakyat Post/Malay Mail, 1/6/2020). There is no reasonable explanation as to why one case was considered murder, and another a lesser RTA offence. It will also be a violation of the Federal Constitution.

2 Acts with the Same Offence – Discrimination and no equality before the law?

Malaysia’s Federal Constitution in Article 8(1) states that ‘(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.’

As such there should be only one offence in one law, and not the same offence under different laws, which also raises the question why was one charged for an offence carrying the mandatory death penalty, and another under another Act which provides a lesser sentence.

The possibility of discrimination, abuse and corruption arises when there exist different laws for the same offence. For killing or causing injury, the Penal Code already provides for this offence, there is no need for Road Transport Act to have the same offence.

If need be, for a special offence committed whilst drunk or intoxicated, then maybe such offences should be inserted in the Penal Code.

Therefore MADPET calls on the government to immediately amend the Road Transport (Amendment) Bill 2020 and the Road Transport Act 1987 to:-

1) Remove the mandatory minimum sentences for all offences and restore sentencing discretion to our judges and courts;

2) Consider removing the offences of causing death and/or injury in the Road Transport Act, given the fact that today  any driver, under the influence of drugs or alcohol, who kills or injures another can already be charged under the Penal Code.

MADPET also urges the repeal of similar or same offences now found in different laws, to ensure compliance with our Federal Constitution, and this will dispel possibilities of discrimination and other abuses.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 


Alleged drunk driver in Kuantan crash charged with murder [NSTTV]

KUANTAN: A 41-year-old fish wholesaler was charged at the Magistrate's Court here today with murdering an Alam Flora supervisor last week.

Teoh Kian Peng from Tanah Putih here nodded when the charge was read to him in Bahasa Melayu before magistrate Najwa Hashim.

However, no plea was recorded from the accused – who is believed to have been drunk during the incident – for the charge under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which carries a mandatory death sentence upon conviction.

Based on the charge sheet, Teoh is accused of murdering Irwan Herman Kamarudin, 41, along the Jalan Kuantan Bypass near Petronas Bukit Rangin here at about 9.20pm on May 25.

Deputy public prosecutor Nasrul Hadi Abdul Ghani did not offer bail, saying that it was a non-bailable offence.

Nasrul Hadi said the accused will be detained while waiting for proceedings to begin and requested a new mention date to allow the prosecution to receive case-related documents.

"The prosecution will wait for the post-mortem, and the Puspakom (Computerised Vehicle Inspection Centre), Chemistry Department and forensic reports.

"The accused will be sent to the Penor Prison," he said.

Meanwhile, Teoh's lawyer, Tay Yi Kuan, sought permission to explain the charge to his client for a few minutes after today's proceedings.

Najwa later set July 8 for mention.

Irwan Herman was killed after his Toyota Yaris was hit by the driver of a Toyota C-HR, which was moving against the flow of traffic, along the stretch.

He was travelling to work in Gebeng, near here, and was killed on-the-spot due to chest injuries, while the suspect escaped with light bruises.

The suspect is believed to have consumed alcohol at a friend's house in Semambu before getting behind the wheel of his vehicle and driving against traffic flow before the crash. - New Straits Times, 1/6/2020

Man Out Delivering Food Killed By Suspected Drunk Driver In KL

Kirat Kaur


A food delivery rider died in the early hours of the morning after a suspected drunk driver crashed into his motorbike at the Sultan Iskandar Highway in Kuala Lumpur.

Malay Mail reports that the 1.30 am accident involved 44-year-old victim Mohamed Zaili Mohamed, a contract worker who was on his way home to Bukit Antarabangsa after delivering food sold by his wife.

The police have clarified that he was not a rider under FoodPanda despite images of the food delivery service bag seen at the accident site.

Kuala Lumpur Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department chief ACP Zulkefly Yahya said that it is believed that his motorcycle was struck from behind by a dark blue Nissan Grand Livina.

The hit led to the victim crashing into the shoulder of the road and his motorcycle was dragged for around 2km. Mohamed Zaili died on the spot with severe head injuries, while the 21-year-old driver was unharmed.

According to ACP Zulkefly, the driver stopped under the Titiwangsa LRT station pedestrian bridge after being detained by the public. He was then arrested and brought to the Jalan Tun HS Lee police station where he was screened. Alcohol content was detected in the man’s breath.

The case is currently being investigated under Section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987 which covers driving under the influence of liquor or drugs.

Section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987.
(Credit: Search Results Web result with site links Attorney General’s Chamber Official Portal)

Food delivery rider dies in KL highway accident involving suspected drink-driver aged 21

Kuala Lumpur Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department ACP Zulkefly Yahya said that the fatal road accident occurred at around 1.30am this morning at the Sultan Iskandar Highway heading to the Kuala Lumpur city centre. — Bernama pic
Kuala Lumpur Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department ACP Zulkefly Yahya said that the fatal road accident occurred at around 1.30am this morning at the Sultan Iskandar Highway heading to the Kuala Lumpur city centre. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, June 1 — A 44-year-old man died in the wee hours this morning after a 21-year-old driver suspected of drink-driving was believed to have crashed into his motorcycle at a highway in Kuala Lumpur, the police has said.

Kuala Lumpur Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department chief ACP Zulkefly Yahya said that the fatal road accident occurred at around 1.30am this morning at the Sultan Iskandar Highway heading to the Kuala Lumpur city centre.

The accident involved 44-year-old victim Mohamed Zaili Mohamed who was a contract worker residing in Bukit Antarabangsa, Selangor and who was on a red motorcycle of the Honda Ex5 model, while the driver is a 21-year-old youth who was driving a dark blue Nissan Grand Livina.

Zulkefly said Mohamed's motorcycle was believed to have been struck from behind by the Nissan Grand Livina while he was on the way home to his residence in Bukit Antarabangsa after delivering food sold by his wife.

“As a result of that hit, the victim crashed to the left shoulder of the road and his motorcycle was dragged about 2km from the location that was hit by the Nissan Grand Livina. The driver stopped the vehicle under the Titiwangsa LRT station's pedestrian bridge after being detained by the public,” he said.

According to Zulkefly, the motorcyclist sustained severe injuries to the head and died on the spot, while the driver did not sustain any injuries. The back part of the motorcycle was found damaged, while the Nissan Grand Livina's front parts were found damaged.

While photos of the incident showed a FoodPanda food delivery pack, Zulkefly has confirmed that the motorcyclist was not a rider under the food delivery service, clarifying that the motorcyclist was delivering food prepared by his wife.

The driver was arrested and brought to the Jalan Tun HS Lee police station, with screening tests showing that there was alcohol content detected in the man's breath, Zulkefly said.

The police are investigating the case under Section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987.

Section 44(1) covers the offence of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, with the crime being driving while under the influence to the extent of being incapable of having proper control of the vehicle or having alcohol levels in the body beyond the prescribed limits and causing the death or injury of any person.

The offence is punishable by a jail term of between three to 10 years, and a fine of between RM8,000 to RM20,000, with conviction also resulting in the offender being disqualified from having a driving licence for not less than five years from conviction date, while repeat offenders would be barred for 10 years from conviction date from having a driving licence.

In a separate statement, Kuala Lumpur police chief CP Datuk Seri Mazlan Lazim confirmed the facts of the case where the motorcycle was dragged about 2.2km from the incident scene, adding that the Evidential Breath Analyser screening test on the suspect showed that the alcohol content in his breath had exceeded limits.

Mazlan said the driver will be remanded for further investigation.

“The Kuala Lumpur police seriously views the issue of drunk drivers that put the lives of other road users in danger. To curb this issue, the police will carry out more operations.

“Besides that, the public is also advised to be more responsible and not to be selfish, by avoiding from driving the vehicles themselves if they are intoxicated,” Mazlan said, adding that those with queries or information to share could contact the Jalan Tun HS Lee police station at 03-20719999 or the Kuala Lumpur police hotline at 03-21159999 or any nearest police station. - Malay Mail, 1/6/2020

 

Monday, August 10, 2020

End Discrimination in the Administration of Criminal Justice in Malaysia Lock-Up and Prison Reforms, including overcrowding and pre-conviction detention, cannot be delayed

 

Media Statement – 10/8/2020

End Discrimination in the Administration of Criminal Justice in Malaysia

Lock-Up and Prison Reforms, including overcrowding

and pre-conviction detention, cannot be delayed

 

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) is appalled with the discrimination in the administration of justice, overcrowding of Malaysian prisons and lock-up conditions as recently again disclosed by Lim Guan Eng after he spent overnight in the lock-up.

Lock-Up and Prison Reforms

Lim Guan Eng was reported saying, “I had to change to the SPRM (MACC) orange T-shirt and slept on the wooden floor in the small lock-up (no pillow, no mattress),…”(Malaysiakini, 8/8/2020). It seems that he may be alone in the lock-up during his detention, but the norm is far worse when many are detained together in a single lock-up.

The conditions these suspects, not even accused persons, face in some of these lock-ups whilst under remand may be far worse even when compared to conditions of prison cells, which houses the convicted. Prison cells, for example, have beds, but not the case for lock-ups.

Repeated calls for reforms and improvement of Malaysian lock-ups and prison conditions, have yet to be addressed by the government, be it the past Barisan Nasional government, the Pakatan Harapan plus government or even the present Perikatan government.

Discrimination of victims of the Administration of Criminal Justice must end

Lim Guan Eng highlighted the differential treatment by the authorities compared to the treatment accorded to others prominent persons like the former premier Najib Razak.

Special treatment accorded to some politicians or personalities, however, is not the issue, but the discrimination against every other persons in Malaysia, who during investigation are forced to spend days in remand, staying in lock-ups which are sub-standard detention places compared to international standards and best practices.

When some of the recent politicians and prominent personalities, are being investigated, many are not even remanded, which means they do not have to spend days in police lock-ups, suffering not just deprivation of freedoms but also being subjected to poor living conditions in police lock-ups.

No remand is needed for the police or enforcement agencies to complete their investigations. Persons suspected of crimes can simply be asked to turn up at particular times for purpose of investigations. If, and only if, they refuse to corporate, will there be any justification for remand – requiring them to be detained and kept in police lock-ups during investigations.

Over-crowded Prisons

Malaysian Prisons Department Deputy Director-general (Security and Correctional) Datuk Alzafry Mohamed Alnassif Mohamed Adahan, was recently reported saying that there are currently ‘68,000 prison inmates are currently housed in 42 prisons nationwide…’ and that this ‘…number exceeded the prescribed capacity of 52,000…“The number consists of 54,508 locals and 14,095 foreigners. Occupancy is increasing and if you follow the trend, the number will not decrease,“ he said…’(Sun Daily, 8/8/2020)

The then Minister responsible under the previous PH government, Datuk Liew Vui Keong also talked about prison overcrowding. ‘Speaking on the severity of prison overcrowding here, Liew noted that one prison made prisoners sleep in shifts to mitigate….This was due to lack of beds for a 10-person cell housing 20 prisoners, forcing them to take turns with 10 to stand while the other 10 sleep, he said.’(Malay Mail, 9/3/2019). At time, it was said that ‘…Malaysia could only accommodate a maximum of 45,000 prisoners, but said the current number of prisoners has reached over 66,000…’

Besides, the issue of human rights violations, the other concern is the financial implications to Malaysians. In 2019, the then Minister said that the ‘…daily cost for a prisoner ranges from RM38 to RM41,…’. This means that the minimum daily cost involved for the 65,222 prisoners would be at least over RM2.4 million…’. Likewise, Malaysians will be paying when persons are remanded in lock-ups for the purpose of investigations.

According to the World Prison Brief, who claims data obtained from the Malaysian government, a large number of persons detained in Malaysian prisons are not persons already convicted and serving out their sentence. ‘In 2015, for example, there were a total of 51,602 persons in Malaysian prisons, and about 25.8% (13,000) of them were remand pre-trial prisoners.’ These pre-trial detainees would include those poor that cannot afford bail and others who were denied bail, which would include those charged with one of the many offences listed under SOSMA.

Pre-conviction Detention and delayed trials can cause the innocent to plead guilty

Pre-conviction detention or punishment is unjust, a violation of human rights. Article 11(1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.” Punishment should best come only after one is convicted and sentenced by court after a fair trial.

Pre-conviction detention, with an uncertainty of when the trial will end, may even cause many an innocent person to simply plead guilty, for then, they can be certain as to when they will be freed to resume normal life.

After all, unlike the ‘richer’ accused, the possibility of an agreement with the prosecution to discontinue criminal proceedings if they return the fruits of their crime and/or part of it, this  possibility is almost non-existent for ordinary accused.

Compensation for innocent for the detention suffered and other consequences

Malaysia needs a law that provides for compensation to innocent victims of criminal justice system, who are ultimately found not guilty and also those remanded who are never even charged. They justly must be compensated for the deprivation of liberty, loss of income and other negative consequences of detention. Thailand today have an act which addresses this, being the Damages for the Injured Person and. Compensation and Expense for the Accused in Criminal Case Act, B.E. 2544.

Such laws may also deter abuse of the powers by law enforcers, and may reduce unnecessary remand or other pre-conviction detentions.

Therefore, MADPET

-          Calls for the end of discrimination of the victims of the administration of justice system in Malaysia;

-          Calls for an improvement and reform of lock-up and prison conditions to be in compliance with international standards and best practice;

-          Calls for an end of the practice of remanding suspects for the purpose of investigations, safe for very serious crimes and for justified reasons of fear of absconding;

-          Calls for the immediate release of all prisoners, who have yet to be tried and convicted, safe for those who have committed very serious crimes and/or have a high justifiable flight risk,

-          Calls for speedy trials, for all the yet to be convicted in Malaysian prisons, which should end not later than 6 months;

-          Call for Malaysia to introduce laws that will provide for just compensations to those who have been deprived their freedoms and rights, by reason of detention and otherwise, who are ultimately not convicted and/or found to be not guilty, and/or those that have not been even charged after spending days in remand;

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

About 68,000 convicts in 42 prisons nationwide 

08 Aug 2020 / 19:40 H.

KAJANG: About 68,000 prison inmates are currently housed in 42 prisons nationwide, according to Malaysian Prisons Department deputy director-general (Security and Correctional) Datuk Alzafry Mohamed Alnassif Mohamed Adahan.

He said the number was increasing every year, and for this year, the influx of new residents decreased due to the reduced crime cases as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic pandemic.

Without furnishing further details, he said, although, the latest number exceeded the prescribed capacity of 52,000, the prisons were able to accommodate them currently.

“The number consists of 54,508 locals and 14,095 foreigners. Occupancy is increasing and if you follow the trend, the number will not decrease,“ he said.

He said this to Bernama in conjunction with the Bank Rakyat Sinar Aidiladha Programme contribution presentation ceremony at the Kajang Prison Headquarters Auditorium, here today.

In another development, Alzafry Mohamed Alnassif said the department always practiced physical distancing and complied with the standard operating procedures (SOP) set by the government to break the Covid-19 epidemic chain.

“The prisons always practice the prescribed SOP so that there are no unwanted incidents and are careful in accepting new inmates, including the presence of the public,“ he said.

He said new inmates would be quarantined in a special designated block upon admission and the prisons would conduct an examination first before they were allowed to be placed with other inmates.

“If these inmates are found to be unwell, the Prisons Department will contact the Ministry of Health or the nearest hospital for further action,“ he said.

In early June, Bernama reported that a non-citizen prison inmate, an illegal immigrant at the Sungai Buloh prison, was confirmed positive for Covid-19.

Earlier, Bank Rakyat donated 34 cows worth RM166,600 to 1,830 frontline staff and zakat recipients in conjunction with the Hari Raya Aidiladha celebration. - Bernama - Sun Daily, 8/8/2020

 

Slept on wooden floor, no mattress or pillow - Guan Eng recounts night in lock-up

Published
Modified 8 Aug 2020, 7:07 pm
211

Lim Guan Eng had to sleep on a wooden floor after he was detained overnight in the lock-up of the MACC headquarters in Putrajaya.

The former finance minister (above, left) recounted his ordeal in a Facebook post late last night.

He also claimed that his predecessor, Najib Abdul Razak, did not receive the same treatment when the latter was arrested in relation to the SRC International and 1MDB scandals.

“I had to change to the SPRM (MACC) orange T-shirt and slept on the wooden floor in the small lock-up (no pillow, no mattress), unlike my predecessor who did not spend a single night in the lock-up.

“Whether this is double-standard or not, only MACC can answer,” he added.

Meanwhile, the DAP secretary-general said he was upset upon learning that his wife, Betty Chew, was also arrested by the MACC in Penang yesterday, fearing that she too would have to spend the night in the lock-up.

Lim said his wife was detained although she had nothing to do with the Penang undersea tunnel project or government matters.

“I was relieved she was released,” he added.

'They know where it hurts most'

Lim, who had served as Penang chief minister before assuming the post of a federal minister after Pakatan Harapan won the last general election, reiterated his claim of being a victim of political persecution.

“PN (Perikatan Nasional government) going after me with baseless charges is to be expected. After all, this unelected government needs to reinforce its slim parliamentary majority.

“But to go for my wife, who even though a lawyer, does not enjoy a luxurious lifestyle, shows that they know how to hit you where you helplessly hurt most,” he added.

Yesterday, Lim claimed trial to a charge of soliciting a bribe with regard to the RM6.3 billion Penang undersea tunnel project in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court. He has since been released on bail.

The opposition leader is also expected to face additional charges on Aug 10 and 11 at the Penang Sessions Court.

Meanwhile, his wife would be charged at the Butterworth Sessions Court on Tuesday under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing, and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities (Amla) Act.

Najib in lock-up?

Yesterday, MACC chief commissioner Azam Baki told Malaysiakini that Lim was not the first politician to be detained overnight and defended his officers' actions.

He listed Najib as among the prominent politicians who had been detained overnight by the commission before being produced in court, though it is unclear if Najib had also spent the night in a lock-up.

He said the decision to arrest a suspect is up to the discretion of an investigating officer and is provided for under the law.

Najib has earlier claimed that he did not spend a night in the lock-up before he was brought to the court to be charged.

"I was not in the lock-up. I was in the MACC building," he told journalists after posting bail on Sept 20, 2018, for money laundering and power abuse charges involving 1MDB.

However, in a Facebook post yesterday, Najib claimed that he spent two nights in the MACC lock-up. Malaysiakini is seeking further clarification from the former premier regarding this. - Malaysiakini, 8/8/2020

Minister: Putrajaya aims to reduce prison population, not build more jails

Liew said the prisons in Malaysia could only accommodate a maximum of 45,000 prisoners, but said the current number of prisoners has reached over 66,000. — AFP pic
Liew said the prisons in Malaysia could only accommodate a maximum of 45,000 prisoners, but said the current number of prisoners has reached over 66,000. — AFP pic

KUALA LUMPUR, March 9 ― The government wants to lower convict numbers instead of building more prisons to accommodate them, Datuk Liew Vui Keong has said.

Liew noted that prisons nationwide were now over capacity, but reportedly said the government does not plan to construct more as this was not part of the government's key performance indicators (KPI).

“Our goal is to implement effective measures to reduce the number of prisoners, not to build more prisons, we are prepared to actively push for awareness activities, to advise youths to stay away from drugs, while at the same time guide convicts to return to the straight path through community reform programmes,” the minister in charge of legal affairs was quoted saying yesterday by local daily Sin Chew Daily.

Liew said the prisons in Malaysia could only accommodate a maximum of 45,000 prisoners, but said the current number of prisoners has reached over 66,000.

“Among the prisoners are drug offenders exceeding 46,000 people, amounting for 56 per cent. There are 1,281 prisoners on death row, among them 932 are drug traffickers, the other 300-odd includes the 19 who were involved in the Lahad Datu intrusion incident,” he also said.

Speaking on the severity of prison overcrowding here, Liew noted that one prison made prisoners sleep in shifts to mitigate.

This was due to lack of beds for a 10-person cell housing 20 prisoners, forcing them to take turns with 10 to stand while the other 10 sleep, he said.

During parliamentary debate on October 30, 2018, Liew had said that there were 65,222 convicts in prison, with about 36,313 or 55 per cent who were drug offenders.

Citing statistics from the prison authorities, Liew said that the daily cost for a prisoner ranges from RM38 to RM41, inclusive of cost for amenities and prison officer wages.

This means that the minimum daily cost involved for the 65,222 prisoners would be at least over RM2.4 million. - Malay Mail,9/3/2019

 

 

See related posts:-


Guan Eng's lock-up experience and Malaysian overcrowded prisons - When will there be REFORMS?

Prison conditions and OTHER prisoner rights? Why not, Anwar Ibrahim?

68 year old Singaporean sues Malaysia's Immigration Dept for RM2.67m over 'inhuman’/wrongful detention? Time for prison reforms?

25 - 37% of the total prison population in Malaysia are innocent? Poor - so cannot afford bail?

In Kajang Prison only 300 teenagers languish waiting YEARS for their day in court...

71.3 percent(?) of those in prison are Malays when only about 50% Malays in Malaysia - UMNO-BN failure?