Saturday, April 29, 2023

After Mandatory Death Penalty, Abolish Detention Without Trial Laws End Detention/Restriction Without Right To Fair Trial in Upcoming May Parliamentary Session - MADPET

 


 

Media Statement – 29/4/2023

After Mandatory Death Penalty, Abolish Detention Without Trial Laws

End Detention/Restriction Without Right To Fair Trial in Upcoming May Parliamentary Session

As this Malaysian government’s actions leading to the abolition of mandatory death penalty and imprisonment for natural life is applauded, MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) calls for the immediate repeal of the even more draconian Detention Without Trial(DWT) laws like Prevention Of Crime Act 1959(POCA), Prevention Of Terrorism Act 2015(POTA) and the Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985.

As there is no trial, the victims of DWT laws will never ever be sentenced to death or natural life imprisonment for the crimes the government allege that they have committed.

These DWT laws ignore the presumption of innocence until proven guilty after a fair trial, where accused persons have a right to defend himself/herself and the Judge finally decides whether one is guilty or not. Article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: “Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a public trial at which they have had all the guarantees necessary for their defence.”

Anyone, including the innocent, can be victims of any DWT laws, as these Malaysian laws does not even allow victims the access to court to challenge the reasons used to justify their detention or restrictions.

Section 15B(1) of POCA, where similar provisions are in all DWT laws, states,  There shall be no judicial review in any court of, and no court shall have or exercise any jurisdiction in respect of, any act done or decision made by the Board in the exercise of its discretionary power in accordance with this Act, except in regard to any question on compliance with any procedural requirement in this Act governing such act or decision.’ This means you cannot challenge or question the alleged reasons or justifications as to why you have been arrested, detained or restricted indefinitely by DWT laws, only whether the proper procedure has been followed by the authorities.

Double Punishment for Crimes

Section 17 POCA states that, ‘Any registered person who is convicted of any offence committed after the date of the entry of his name on the Register under the provisions of any law specified in the Second Schedule shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of twice as long as the maximum term for which he would have been liable on conviction for that offence, and also to whipping.’ This includes some offences under Penal Code, Societies Act and other laws.

Thus, for example, for the Section 323 Penal Code offence of ‘…voluntarily causes hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to two thousand ringgit or with both….’, the person whose name has been registered under POCA will be facing the risk of DOUBLE the sentence provided in law. Noting the fact that persons registered under POCA have literally have no way of challenging the reasons for the arrest, detention, restriction and even entry into the Register, it is most unjust and in violation of the principle in Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution which states, ‘(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.’ On conviction of a crime, everyone should be sentenced in accordance to the sentence provided in law for that crime. To be liable to higher or double sentence is simply unjust.  

Even If Celebrities Like Anwar, Kit Siang… No Longer Victims Of DWT – It Still Must Go

Even though, for some time now, since the abolition of the infamous Internal Security Act, no prominent persons like Karpal Singh, Anwar Ibrahim, Mat Sabu, Hadi Awang, Irene Xavier or Theresa Lim Chin Chin have been arrested, detained or restricted under DWT laws, many persons continue to be victims of these DWT laws and we cannot ignore the need to speedily repeal all DWT laws.

In March 2022, a member of the Crime Prevention Board (LPJ) under the Home Ministry revealed that from April 2014 until March 10 2022, action has been taken against 10,012 individuals using POCA. A total of 2,673 individuals were placed under the detention order while another 6,537 individuals under the surveillance order, and another 802 individuals were released. As of 28/2/2022, a total of 425 individuals are still placed under the detention order while another 2,166 individuals are still under surveillance order. (Star, 13/3/2022)

He also reportedly said that ‘…based on the 2021 statistics, a total of 1,190 people had action taken against them under Poca compared with 1,968 in 2020 in several areas including Simpang Renggam, Pokok Sena, Bentong and Bintulu. He said most of the cases involved drug-related crimes and criminal fraud through the Internet…’

In March 2023, a media report stated, ‘…On POCA, Saifuddin [Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail] said that 132 individuals were detained, of which 67 were Malays, 13 Chinese, 38 Indians, 13 of other races and one foreigner. He said those detained were between 19 and 59 years old…’(Star, 7/3/2023)

POCA, which was originally for violent crimes committed by triads and gangs, have since been amended and it can be applied broadly even for all penal code offences suspected to be committed by more than 1.

Resort To DWT Laws Easy for Law Enforcement to Avoid Duties to prove guilt?

In the recently disclosed 2019 Royal Commission of Inquiry Report On The Discovery Of Transit Camps And Graves At Wang Kelian, which confirmed the deaths of about 114 persons, it was stated that the before 2015, the police did not bring many cases to court for human trafficking prosecution, as POCA was used to take action against them.  This is possible as POCA now is so broad and can be used for a variety of crimes.

Hence, DWT laws can even be used to ‘protect’ even criminals, to deny victims of crime closure, and even the possibility of being compensated by convicted criminals.

How many murderers are under DWT laws, who if charged and convicted in court would face the death penalty if convicted – who now allows them to walk free after being detained for a couple of years?

Has the DWT laws caused law enforcement to get lazy, as they do not have to thoroughly investigate to be able to convince the court of the guilt of the accused if they elect to use POCA and other DWT laws.

Are there cases where bribes were involved to get law enforcement to use DWT, rather than go for a fair trial, where there may be a risk of other truths being revealed during trial, and the possibility of higher sentences for the guilty?

The guilt of any criminal must be proven in court, and only the courts must have the power to punish vide the sentences provided for the respective crimes in Malaysia.

Extrajudicial punishment imposed by the administration or any other administrative Boards must end. Only the courts and judges determine guilt, and should be the only ones allowed to impose punishment on a person convicted of a crime.

Noting that the next Parliamentary Session of the Malaysian Parliament will be on 22nd May - 15 June 2023, MADPET calls on the Malaysian Government to table the Bills that will lead to the abolition of Detention Without Trial Laws. The session thereafter will be in October, which is long way.

MADPET reiterates the call for a speedy repeal of SOSMA, Sedition Act, Societies Act and all other draconian laws.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 





Eighty-three held under Poca from Jan 1-March 10

Nation
Sunday, 13 Mar 2022 4:50 PM MYT




KOTA BARU: A total of 83 individuals nationwide have been detained under the Prevention of Crime Act (Poca) 1959 from Jan 1 to March 10 this year.

A member of the Crime Prevention Board (LPJ) under the Home Ministry, Datuk Khalil Azlan Chik said from the figure, 12 were placed under the detention order while another 71 individuals were placed under the surveillance order.

He said LPJ received many case files for action either to issue a police detention order or a surveillance order against hardcore criminals who cannot be prosecuted by the courts due to certain problems.

"It is difficult to accuse a person in court without proof. However, there are testimonies about the involvement of individuals and their files have already been submitted.

"Action can only be taken after we have gone through the processes at Bukit Aman and the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC).

“The enquiry officer would also have to meet the detainee before making recommendations to LPJ for further action,” he said to reporters after launching the Melor police station here.

Also present were Kelantan police chief Datuk Muhamad Zaki Harun and Kelantan Crime Prevention and Community Safety Department (JPJKK) head ACP Mit Emong.
Khalil said since Poca was introduced on April 2, 2014 until March 10, action has been taken against 10,012 individuals under the Act.

A total of 2,673 individuals were placed under the detention order while another 6,537 individuals under the surveillance order, and another 802 individuals were released.

As of Feb 28, a total of 425 individuals are still placed under the detention order while another 2,166 individuals are still under surveillance order.

This brings the total number of those who are still under detention and surveillance orders at 2,591 individuals.

"In Kelantan alone, there are a total of 127 individuals from outside the contingent registered under Poca placed in various police stations in this state,” he said.

Khalil said based on the 2021 statistics, a total of 1,190 people had action taken against them under Poca compared with 1,968 in 2020 in several areas including Simpang Renggam, Pokok Sena, Bentong and Bintulu.

He said most of the cases involved drug-related crimes and criminal fraud through the Internet.

"We also discovered that most of them are aged between 30 and 40. The youngest to date is an 18-year-old individual while the oldest is 73 years old.

"The purpose of the order is to initiate police-society collaboration to guide the individuals into becoming useful individuals. We hope after two years, they will be rehabilitated and released to their home states,” he added. - Bernama, Star - 13/3/2022



Hundreds held under Sosma, Poca and Pota last year

Nation
Tuesday, 07 Mar 2023




KUALA LUMPUR: A total of 624 individuals were detained under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act (Sosma) last year, says Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail (pic).

The Home Minister added that 140 of these detainees had already been released.

“Of those detained, 71 were charged in court, 401 were punished, 140 were released and 12 are still under investigation,” he said in a written reply to a question by Chow Yu Hui (PH-Raub) in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday.

Chow had asked about the number of those detained under Sosma, as well as the breakdown of their race and ages.

He also enquired about the number of those detained under the Prevention of Crime Act (Poca) and the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Pota).

Last month, Saifuddin Nasution, in a written reply to RSN Rayer (PH-Jelutong), said Sosma was still a relevant law to maintain national security because it allows the police to take immediate action to defuse any threats to national sovereignty and harmony.

Repealing Sosma was not among the pledges in Pakatan Harapan’s GE15 election manifesto, though several DAP leaders had previously criticised Sosma as having draconian provisions.


Meanwhile, Saifuddin Nasution said those detained under Sosma last year were between 18 and 69 years old and included 247 Malays, 83 Chinese, 89 Indians, 47 of other races and 158 foreigners.

On Poca, Saifuddin said that 132 individuals were detained, of which 67 were Malays, 13 Chinese, 38 Indians, 13 of other races and one foreigner.

He said those detained were between 19 and 59 years old.

Poca, which was amended in 2015, is a preventative law to deal with criminals, particularly members of secret societies, terrorists and other undesirable persons.

Saifuddin Nasution said that only one individual, a Malay, was detained under Pota and is currently under a detention order.

Pota, which was passed in April 2015, allowed authorities to take action against Malaysians suspected of being involved with the Islamic State or other terrorist organisations.

To a written question by Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan (PN-Tasek Gelugor), Saifuddin said that as of Jan 30 this year, 195 individuals were detained under Sosma and are currently undergoing trial.

Of this total, 46 were for smuggling and human trafficking, two for terrorism and 147 for organised crime under the Penal Code.  - Star, 7/3/2023

Tuesday, April 11, 2023

Senate passed mandatory abolition Bills, now up to King and Minister? Call on the King to speedily give his Royal Assent to the Bills abolishing Mandatory Death Penalty and Imprisonment for Natural Life, and thereafter for the Minister to put it into force these Acts without any delay

Media Statement – 12/4/2023

Call on the King to speedily give his Royal Assent to the Bills abolishing Mandatory Death Penalty and Imprisonment for Natural Life, and thereafter for the Minister to put it into force these Acts without any delay

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) welcomes the passing by the Malaysian Senate, the upper or other house of the Malaysian Parliament, on 11/4/2023 of the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill 2023 and Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction Of The Federal Court) Bill 2023. The Dewan Rakyat(House of Representatives) of Parliament passed these Bills on 3/4/2023.

Time for the King to give his Royal Assent

After this, the King (Yang di-Pertuan Agong) will have to assent to the Bills. Article 66(4) states (4) The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall within thirty days after a Bill is presented to him assent to the Bill by causing the Public Seal to be affixed thereto. However, if the King do not assent within the stipulated 30 days, then according to Article 66(4A) which states, “…(4A) If a Bill is not assented to by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong within the time specified in Clause (4), it shall become law at the expiration of the time specified in that Clause in the like manner as if he had assented thereto…’

Minister must not procrastinate in putting Acts in force

Even after the King has assented to the Bill, it will still not become law until it is published and put into force by the relevant Minister. Article 66(5) says ‘…A Bill shall become law on being assented to by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or as provided in Clause (4A), but no law shall come into force until it has been published, without prejudice, however, to the power of Parliament to postpone the operation of any law or to make laws with retrospective effect….’

MADPET asks the King to speedily assent to these Bills, and for the Minister to thereafter immediately cause it to be published and put into force.

The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill 2023

The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill 2023 abolishes mandatory death penalty and natural life imprisonment. Thereafter, for these death penalty offences, judges will have the discretion to sentence to death or sentence “imprisonment for a term of not less than thirty years but not exceeding forty years and if not sentenced to death, shall also be punished with whipping of not less than twelve strokes”.

The Bill also will also amend “imprisonment for natural life” with the words “imprisonment for a term of not less than thirty years but not exceeding forty years”. These reasonably ends imprisonment until one die.

In Malaysia, the sentence of ‘Imprisonment for life’ is as stated in the Criminal Justice Act section which says, that “Where any person is treated as having been sentenced or is hereafter sentenced to imprisonment for life, such sentence shall be deemed for all purposes to be a sentence of imprisonment for thirty years;

Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction Of The Federal Court) Bill 2023

Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction Of The Federal Court) Bill 2023 will allow the Federal Court to review the sentence of death and imprisonment for natural life imposed on a convicted person following the abolition of the mandatory death penalty. This will benefit the about 840 of the 1,320 on death row, who have completed all appeals will have their death sentence reviewed by the Federal Court. Likewise, those that who have been sentenced to natural life imprisonment.

MADPET calls for the King (Yang di-Pertuan Agong) to speedily assent the said 2 Bills, being The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill 2023 and the Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction Of The Federal Court) Bill 2023;

MADPET calls for the Minister responsible, after getting Royal assent, to immediately publish and put the 2 Acts of Parliament into force.

Noting that the Bills, when it becomes Acts of Parliament, will not abolish the death penalty, MADPET reiterates its call for the abolition of the death penalty, and the continued moratorium on execution pending abolition.

MADPET also reiterate for the abolition of all forms of corporal punishment, including whipping.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

###

See earlier Media Statements of relevance.

Bills for Abolition Of Mandatory Death Penalty, Imprisonment For Natural Life And The Giving The Courts Power To Review Those Currently On Death Row Passed on 3/4/2023 - MADPET

Media Statement – 28/3/2023

Removing Mandatory Death Penalty And Mandatory Life Imprisonment Is Just, And Increases Chances That Those Who Ordered Or ‘Paid’ For Death Will No Longer Escape Justice

 

Media Statement – 22/3/2023

Delay In The Abolition Of The Mandatory Death Penalty And The Death Penalty By The PH-Led Government Disappointing

Table and pass the Bills in this Parliamentary Session (13/2 – 4/4/2023)

 

Ramkarpal: Death penalty not proven as best preventive measure for serious crimes

Ramkarpal: Death penalty not proven as best preventive measure for serious crimes
Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Ramkarpal Singh speaks during a Parliament sitting in Kuala Lumpur April 11, 2023. — Bernama pic



KUALA LUMPUR, April 11 — The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Bill 2023 would not necessarily lead to an increase in serious crime cases, the Dewan Negara was told today.

Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Ramkarpal Singh said crime rates were not solely dependent on heavy punishment, and there was no study to show that death penalty was the best measure to prevent crimes.

“Before this, a committee led by a former Chief Justice had conducted a study on this issue and found that the deterrent effect is not as what was told. There are many factors that can affect crime rates, such as economic, social and psychological.

“Crime rates also depend on the effectiveness of law enforcement, the public’s understanding of the effects of crime and also the opportunity to commit a crime,” he said when winding up the debate on the bill.

The bill was passed without amendments by majority voice vote after a debate by 17 senators.

Ramkarpal said the bill was an ‘omnibus’ act as it included amendments to the Penal Code, Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971, Arms Act 1960, Kidnapping Act 1961, Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, Strategic Trade Act 2010 and Criminal Procedure Code.

The House also approved the Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Review (Federal Court Provisional Jurisdiction) Bill 2023 after it was debated by 12 senators.

The bill aims to empower the Federal Court to review the death penalty and life sentence of inmates following the abolishment of the mandatory death penalty. — Bernama, Malay Mail, 11/4/2023





Wednesday, April 05, 2023

Backbencher MPs must not be appointed to government agencies or GLCs, as it can compromise their Parliamentary duties to monitor the Executive to prevent wrongdoings

 

Media Statement – 6/4/2023

Backbencher MPs must not be appointed to government agencies or GLCs, as it can compromise their Parliamentary duties to monitor the Executive to prevent wrongdoings

When sitting Members of Parliament (MPs) accept appointments by the Executive, being from the Prime Minister and/or the Cabinet, to positions in statutory bodies/agencies or government owned/linked companies (GLCs), their independence or ability to be an effective check against Executive abuses and wrongdoings may be compromised. With such appointments, they may receive additional monies, benefits and powers, over and above their MP’s allowances.

MPs, not in the Cabinet, have a very important Parliamentary role of overseeing and monitoring the Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, his Ministers and cabinet members to ensure that there is, amongst others, no wrongdoing, mistakes, abuses and corruption in government.

This is also the role of MPs that are from parties that today form the Pakatan Harapan-led coalition government who are commonly known as ‘government backbenchers’.

On 7/3/2023, Mohd Sany Hamzan, a government backbencher in Parliament, urged the government to launch investigation into the Pharmaniaga Bhd, a pharmaceutical group that suffered losses, given its link to the Armed Forces Fund Board (LTAT). The MP from the Amanah party, a member of the Pakatan Harapan, amongst others, said that ‘…we cannot compromise on matters related to misappropriation, breach of trust and corruption that plague our country,” (Edge Markets, March 7). After his appointment to a government agency, will he still be critical of the government?

Recently, we came to know that the following MPs from parties, now in government, may have been appointed, although there may be many more cases that we are unaware of.

·         Parit Sulong MP Noraini Ahmad (BN and also now UMNO Women Chief) as chairman of the Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (RISDA)

·         Hulu Langat MP Sany Hamzan(Amanah-PH), has been made deputy chairman of Tekun Nasional, a government loan provider for Bumiputera entrepreneurs.

·         PKR,s Balik Pulau MP, Bakhtiar Wan Chik, have been appointed chairman of MyCreative Ventures Sdn Bhd.  MyCreative is a wholly owned subsidiary of Minister of Finance Incorporated.

MPs in Parliament oversees and monitors the government not just by questions and speeches in the Dewan Rakyat, the lower House of Parliament, but also through investigation and inquiries that in Parliament are done by the Parliamentary Committees, including Select and Special Select Committees.

Members of the Cabinet should not be in Committees investigating alleged wrongdoings

Order 77(4) of the Standing Orders of the Malaysian House of Representatives, with regard the Public Accounts Committee states ‘(4) No member may be appointed or nominated to or act as Chairman or member of the Public Accounts Committee while he is a Minister...’ Minister here includes Deputy Ministers and Parliamentary Secretary.

Rightly, the membership of all Parliamentary Committees including Special Select Committees should not include any members of the Executive. Remember that these Committees when conducting their investigation or inquiries have the power to summon witnesses, and it is odd if the related Minister or any other Cabinet member sits as a member of such Parliamentary Committee. Members of the Cabinet may be observers, but should not be in such Parliamentary committees, where the member MPs therein best be independent of the Executive.

Now, it should also be considered whether backbencher MPs appointed to positions in government agencies/bodies/entities or government-linked companies (GLCs) ought to be excluded from Parliamentary Committees including Special Select Committees who may be investigating a particular issue, which most likely will be linked to the Executive. Rightfully, they ought to be excluded as they who gets extra ‘benefit’ from the Executive may be perceived as no longer being independent of the Executive.

MPs have already much to do

A MP, being a peoples’ representative, is primarily loyal to the people in his constituency and in Malaysia generally, not the party that he is part of or its leaders. Backbencher MPs are not part of the decision-making process of the Cabinet, and as such, they are free to raise their concern or criticisms to matters brought by the Minister or Cabinet to Parliament. They should not ‘blindly’ support all that is said or done by the Cabinet simply because their party is part of the coalition that forms the government, or because their party leaders are part of the Cabinet.

Most MPs have over 100,000 persons within their own constituency, and being their representative in Parliament, these MPs are duty bound to be in constant consultation with the people they represent to effectively communicate their constituents’ views, not the MP’s own personal views, in Parliament regarding Bills and issues discussed. This itself will take a lot of time, and hence it is best that Malaysia consider having full-time MPs.

MPs also need to study Bills and issues that will be raised in Parliament to be able to effectively contribute in the Parliamentary Debate. We do not want mere ‘seat warmer’ MPs that will simply vote as instructed by party whips.

MPs also will get appointed to various Parliamentary Committees and even Special Select Committees, which require more work and time. The effectiveness of Parliament and its Committees can be improved to ensure no more 1MDB or SRC scandals arise. It is better to maintain continuous scrutiny on government, government agencies and GLCs, rather than simply responding after the worse had happened to the detriment of Malaysia.

Being appointed as a Chairman or Director of a government agency or GLC also means additional work and responsibility, and a good MP really will not have the time unless he compromises on his other obligations to the people and to Parliament.

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture, which is also concerned about democracy and human rights, urge for the end of appointment of sitting MPs to government agencies or GLCs; and call for those sitting MPs already appointed to immediately resign from their position and return to be good MPs carrying out their roles in Parliament.

Reforms promised by Pakatan Harapan(PH) to the ousting of the Barisan Nasional(BN) regime in GE14. The lack of speedy changes in their about 22 month rule of PH-led government, may have resulted in a drop in support in GE15. PM Anwar Ibrahim and the PH-led government have a 2nd chance, but if similar practices of the then pre-GE14 BN regime is maintained, including political appointment of MPs and politicians, with no real reforms, then the people may be forced to look elsewhere for change.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

       

Extract From Standing Orders

77. (1) There shall be a Committee to be known as the Public Accounts Committee appointed at the
beginning of every Parliament, for the examination of—
(a) the accounts of the Federation and the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure;
(b) such accounts of public authorities and other bodies administering public funds as may be laid before the House;
(c) reports of the Auditor-General laid before the House in accordance with Article 107 of the Constitution;

(d)such other matters as the Committee may think fit, or which may be referred to the Committee by the House.

 

"...A Select Committee other than the Committee of Selection, the Public Accounts Committee, the
Standing Orders Committee, the House Committee and the Committee of Privileges shall be known as
a Special Select Committee. It shall be appointed by order of the House and, subject thereto, shall
consist of such members as may be nominated by the Committee of Selection...."

(2) A Select Committee shall have power to send persons, documents or papers, and shall have leave to report its opinion and observations, together with the minutes of evidence taken before it to the House..."

7) A Select Committee may continue its investigations although the House may be adjourned;>>>


PKR MP is new chairman of MyCreative

The company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Minister of Finance Incorporated and reports to the communications and digital ministry.

513 Shares
facebook sharing button Share
twitter sharing button Tweet
whatsapp sharing button Share
email sharing button Email
Former deputy tourism, arts and culture minister Bakhtiar Wan Chik’s appointment as MyCreative’s chairman takes effect today.
KUALA LUMPUR: Former deputy tourism, arts and culture minister Bakhtiar Wan Chik has been appointed chairman of MyCreative Ventures Sdn Bhd.

The appointment takes effect today.

Bakhtiar, 57, replaces Noor Azmi Mat Said, whose two-year term has expired, said MyCreative Group CEO Junady Nawawi in a statement.

He said Bakhtiar, who is the Balik Pulau MP, can help bring local entrepreneurs and arts activists to the global stage with his vast experience in development and strategic planning, as well as his interest in art, culture and heritage

“It is our collective goal to ensure that MyCreative gives a positive impact on all stakeholders in the creative ecosystem, including artists, entrepreneurs, investors, and the community,” he said.

Junady also expressed his appreciation to Noor Azmi for his contributions to the development of the creative industry.

In the same statement, Bakhtiar said the orange economic sector has the potential to play an important role in contributing to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP).

“I am committed to working hard with the MyCreative team to achieve this goal and help ensure the continued success and growth of the creative industry,” he said.

MyCreative is a wholly owned subsidiary of Minister of Finance Incorporated and reports to the communications and digital ministry with the objective of advancing Malaysia’s creative industry through strategic and innovative investment. - FMT, 10/3/2023

 Opaque political appointments: A case for Parliament oversight

Geraldine Tong
Published:  Mar 31, 2023 4:47 PM
Updated: 6:42 PM
 
Another round of appointing politicians to government agencies, statutory bodies, and GLCs is currently taking place, leading to questions on whether Putrajaya’s appointments were the best people for the job and not for political expediency.

Exacerbating the problem was that Putrajaya has not been that forthcoming with some appointments. For instance, a leaked letter claimed that three politicians were put on the boards of Tekun Nasional and SME Corp. Malaysiakini’s queries to the Entrepreneur Development and Cooperatives Ministry on the matter went unanswered.

In the case of Umno women’s chief Noraini Ahmad, her appointment as Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (Risda) chairperson was announced on the agency’s Facebook page, but was quickly taken down.

Eventually, Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, who oversees Risda and is the Umno president, confirmed to the press that Noraini had indeed been appointed, without drawing attention to the fact that she had a business degree and was appointed to two other government bodies before - Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation (Matrade) and Padiberas Nasional Berhad.

Some civil society groups have expressed concern about the lack of transparency in these appointments and recommended reforms to prevent the exercise from being tainted with conflict of interest, abuse of power, and corruption.

One method, according to the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas), was to improve parliamentary oversight, but there was currently no framework to do so.

“What Malaysia needs is a consolidated guideline that upholds public interest by ensuring impartiality, competence, accountability, and diversity,” said Ideas CEO Tricia Yeoh in a statement.

 

She suggested a guideline can be formulated for Malaysia by referring to the UK’s process where public appointment competitions are advertised to the public with selection criteria, and ministers have limited discretionary powers subject to the advice of an independent panel.

Significant roles will also go through a pre-appointment public hearing by a select committee and its candidate list is publicly published.

“For example, some of these stricter criteria should be applied where board members must possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and the right mindset.

Ideas CEO Tricia Yeoh

“In addition, evaluation criteria of individual directors and the board collectively should be transparent, customised to the specific company’s needs and requirements, and explicitly linked to clear consequences for non-performance,” Yeoh said.

Yeoh said it was paramount for there to be consistency in appointments for key public roles as well as maintaining a balance between an open, transparent process while taking into account ministerial discretion and other political considerations, she said.

Take note of past scandals

C4 Centre deputy CEO K Sudhagaran Stanley told Malaysiakini that a high standard of governance in appointing key public positions is needed because statutory bodies and GLCs involve public funds.

There have also been major scandals that tainted important statutory bodies in the past, such as Felda, Felcra, and Lembaga Tabung Haji while they were helmed by politicians, he said.

Similar to Ideas, Sudhagaran said the selection process must include advertising the vacant position, conducting interviews, and comparing the qualifications and experiences of candidates before the most qualified person is appointed. - Malaysiakini,

 - Malaysiakini, 31/3/2023

Those unable to contribute will not be appointed - Zahid

Bernama
Published:  Mar 26, 2023 8:28 PM
Updated: 8:28 PM
The unity government will not appoint any individual who is unable to contribute to the government organisation or agency they lead, Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said.

Zahid (above), who is also the rural and regional development minister, said that all appointments are made based on cabinet guidelines and on the advice of the prime minister.

"Don’t view it as just because someone has a political position, especially MPs or assemblypersons… their background, credentials and experience are also taken into account.

"This is something that has been done before, but we will not appoint any individual who cannot contribute to the organisation they lead,” he told reporters after paying an official visit to the Penang Regional Development Authority (Perda) in Butterworth today.

Mara chairperson Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki

On the appointment of Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki as Mara chairperson, he said it was based on the Umno secretary-general’s expertise, experience and credentials.

Zahid said Asyraf was not only a politician but a banker with expertise in Islamic banking.

"It’s a waste to have such experience and credentials, but we don't use it to develop Mara together. With the appointment, we hope that he will, together with my ministry’s staff, be able to develop Mara,” he said.

Zahid also confirmed Parit Sulong MP Noraini Ahmad’s appointment as Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (Risda) chairperson and Shaik Hussein Mydin as Perda chairperson.

Political appointments in government agencies became an issue recently following a number of appointments, including Asyraf as Mara chairperson, Jazlan Yaakub as Felcra chairperson and Husam Musa as Syarikat Perumahan Negara Berhad chairperson.

- Bernama - Malaysiakini, 26/3/2023