Media Statement – 10/4/2020
Company/Business Not Providing Essential Services Operating Must be an Offence in Covid-19 MCO Regulations
-
Political
or economic considerations should be put aside in favour of health of the
people -
We, the 29 undersigned groups, organizations and trade unions is appalled
that it seems that it is no longer an offence for companies/businesses, not
providing essential services, who
continue to operate during this movement control order(MCO) to check the spread
of Covid-19.
It not only defeats the intention
of the movement control order(MCO) in place in Malaysia since 18/3/2020 but it also
places hundreds of workers at serious risk of contracting this disease that
causes death, which also puts their families and others at risk.
The Covid-19 pandemic has
resulted in Malaysia taking necessary drastic actions, to get people to stay at
home, practice social distancing and for all business premises, save those
providing selected ‘essential services’ to close during this MCO period.
However, there appears that many
companies/businesses that are not on the list of ‘essential services’ are
continuing to operate all over Malaysia including glue factories, furniture factories
and wood product factories and many others.
When it was highlighted, recently
the government stopped Heineken from operating, even though it could be argued
it fell within the list of ‘essential services’, but a sincere government
interested in the safety of the people ought to not simply exempt
companies/businesses for any other reasons save for those listed as providing ‘essential
services’.
Exemptions by government should
not be simply given.
Note also the new Regulations,
that replaces earlier Regulations have not just reduced the list of ‘essential
services’ but have also not added any new items to the list, like wood
industries that earlier was allegedly granted exemptions.
Individuals being charged in large numbers but not Companies/businesses
On 2/4/2020, Defence Minister
Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob was reported saying that over 4,000 people have
been arrested by the police thus far during the ongoing movement control order
(MCO) with nearly 1,500 charged in court, said. However, what is odd that we do
not hear of many companies/businesses being charged for wrongly continuing to
operate during the MCO>
As far as businesses and
companies are concerned, at the beginning of the MCO, we read about action
taken against a construction company who allegedly violated the MCO (Star,
19/3/2020) but, there were no Directors or managers charged, and the company seem
to have not been charged for breaking the Regulation made under Prevention and
Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988(PACID). Since then, we have not heard
about businesses and/or companies being charged.
First Regulations (until 31/3/2020) - Businesses/Companies Criminally
Liable for MCO offences
Pursuant to the Prevention and
Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988, during the first movement control
order, the Minister made and gazetted the Prevention And Control Of Infectious
Diseases (Measures Within The Infected Local Areas) Regulations 2020(PU(A)
91/2020) which was in effect for the period from 18 March 2020 to 31 March 2020,
whereby in that Regulations it was clear that that companies/businesses not
providing essential services, or those that have obtained exemptions, that
continued to operate was in breach of the law.
In Section/Regulation 5 entitled ‘Essential
Services’, it was stated, amongst others, (1) Any premises providing essential
services may be opened provided that the number of personnel and patron at the
premises shall be kept to the minimum. (2) Any premises not providing essential
services may be opened provided that the owner or occupier of the premises
obtains the prior written permission of the Director General and the Director
General may impose any conditions as he thinks fit….’
This made it clear that any
companies/businesses that did not provide ‘essential services’ or did not get a
‘prior written permission of the Director General’(of Health) committed an
offence if they continued to operate, and the said business/company or ‘body
corporate’ could then be charged jointly and severally with any person who was ‘…a
director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body corporate or
was purporting to act in any such capacity or was in any manner or to any
extent responsible for the management of any of the affairs of the body
corporate or was assisting in such management..’ The penalty, if found guilty,
would have been a sentence of a ‘fine not exceeding one thousand ringgit or to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both.’
2nd Regulations (1-14 April 2020) – Offence of
Companies/Business Operating Absent
However, after the first MCO
ended, and the second MCO began, new Regulations had to be made, and so it was
done - Prevention And Control Of Infectious Diseases (Measures Within Infected
Local Areas) (No. 2) Regulations 2020 (PU(A) 109/2020).
What is glaringly absent from the
new regulations, that was in effect from 1st April until 14th
April, was the absence of the same or similar Section/Regulation 5 in the old
Regulations, which means that now it may no longer be an offence for
companies/businesses which did not provide ‘essential services’ or ‘have
obtained permission of the Director General of Health’ who continued to
operate.
Hence, business operating against the MCO would likely not be able to
be prosecuted or charged for doing so as there was no clear offence in law.
It gives the impression that the
Malaysian government may have elected to protect businesses/companies and their
Directors, managers, etc, which is totally odd and most questionable.
Despite, the raising of this
failing in public space, no amendment to the Regulations have been gazetted,
that would make it an offence for businesses, not allowed to operate, who continued
to operate during the MCO.
Note that when such a
business/company continues to operate, workers have no choice but to return to
work – for a failure to work, may mean termination and loss of jobs.
Politics and the exemption of non- essential services companies/businesses
After the first MCO was declared,
we read that some Ministers and/or Ministries, and even State Government bodies
have been granting exemptions to certain companies/businesses, who on the face
of it did not provide any of the ‘essential services’ as listed in the MCO
regulations, which is also wrong for the MCO law only allows gives the DG of
Health (and now also the Minister of Health) the power to grant any such exemptions,
which is right in this situation when we are faced with a life threatening
infectious disease.
Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yasin’s
coalition government, known as Perikatan Nasional, that came into power in the beginning
of March, not after a General Elections, is a loose coalition of political
parties and independent Members of Parliament (MPs), where doubts still linger
whether the new PM still enjoys the majority support amongst the MPs.
This could be a factor, when the
loss of support of even a few MPs could result in a collapse of this
government. As such, it may be difficult for the government of the day to deny
request for exemptions by some of these MPs and/or their political parties for
fear of loss of support.
It is hoped that such political and
other considerations will not defeat the primary intentions of the MCO to combat
the spread, and overcome Covid-19 that threatens every human life in Malaysia,
including workers and their families, who are forced to leave homes to go to
work, when such exemptions are granted.
Worker’s Right to be heard and Judicial Review also affected
When an employer company/business,
not in the current list of ‘essential services’, applies for exemption, workers
ought to have the right to be heard before exemptions are granted.
Even after exemptions are
granted, workers ought to justly have the right to appeal the decision of the
DG or Minister of Health, failing which they do have a legal right to challenge
any such government decisions in court by way of a Judicial Review.
However, because of the MCO and
its restrictions, including the closure of law firms and the diminished
operations of the courts at this time, it is very difficult, for workers and/or
their trade unions to even mount these appeals and/or challenges in court
regarding these ‘exemptions’. The right for workers to exercise their legal
right to picket is also denied at the moment.
Note also that according to law,
some of these exemptions granted by some Ministers, state or local governments,
and not by the DG or Minister of Health may also be invalid.
It was also disturbing to read
that recently in Sabah, 2 employers and six workers have been sentenced to two
months' jail for operating and working during the movement control order (MCO).
.(Star, 30/3/2020) The penalizing of these workers, who said they were instructed to work if they
wanted their daily salaries, is unjust. Only the employers should have been
charged and sentenced.
Employers who continue operating
during this MCO, in violation of MCO period laws, who jeopardizes the life of
so many ought not be offered compounds, or even sentenced to pay a mere fines. The
human Directors, managers and others ought to given a deterrent sentence, at
the very least imprisonment for their actions/omissions that will puts workers
and their families at risk.
Therefore, we
-
Call on the Malaysia to immediately amend Prevention
And Control Of Infectious Diseases (Measures Within Infected Local Areas) (No.
2) Regulations 2020 (PU(A) 109/2020) to clearly make it an offence for
companies/businesses operating in violation of the law during this MCO period;
-
Call on Malaysia to also subsequently
investigate and prosecute all who wrongly granted permission and/or ‘exemptions’
that led to such companies/businesses, who are not allowed to do so during the
MCO period, to operate, irrespective of whether they are currently Ministers,
Director Generals, Members of the Cabinet or State Executive Committees;
-
Call on the Malaysian government, all Ministers
and State/Local governments to put aside all political and/or economic
considerations during the MCO period, in the interest of safety and health of
all in Malaysia, as we battle Covid-19. There must be no additional pressure on
the DG(or Minister) of Health, to grant exemptions for certain
businesses/companies that do not provide essential services;
-
Call for the immediate publication and gazette
of the list of all companies/businesses allowed to operate during the MCO by reason
of exemption by the Ministry or DG of Health for the good of all workers(and/or
trade unions) involved; and
Charles Hector
Apolinar Tolentino
For and on behalf of the
following 29 groups
WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)
Malaysian Trade Union Congress (MTUC)
Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor(PSWS)
Building and Wood Workers International (BWI) Asia
Pacific Region
MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)
ALIRAN
National Union of Banking Employees(NUBE)
Kesatuan Sekerja Industri Elektronik Wilayah Selatan,
Semenanjung Malaysia (KSIEWSSM)
National Union of Flight Attendants Malaysia (NUFAM)
Network of Action For Migrants in Malaysia (NAMM)
Women Against Rape (United Kingdom)
Labour Behind the Label, United Kingdom
Global Women’s Strike, United Kingdom
Legal Action for Women, United Kingdom
Payday Men’s Network, United Kingdom
Payday Men’s Network, USA
Parti Sosialis Malaysia(PSM)
Sabah Women's Action Resource Group (SAWO)
Women of Color/Global Women’s Strike, United Kingdom
International Black Women for Wages for Housework.
Cement Industry Employees Union (CIEU)
Malayan Technical Services Union (MTSU)
Ministry of Forestry Union (MFOU)
PKNS Employees Union (PKNS)
Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU)
Timber Employees Union of Peninsula Malaysia (TEUPM)
Timber Industry Employees Union of Sarawak (TIEUS)
Union of Construction Industry Employees (UECI)
Union of Forestry Employees of Sarawak (UFES)
No comments:
Post a Comment