Malaysia's 2nd Universal Periodic Review (UPR) was conducted in Geneva on 25 October 2013, and the 3rd UPR Review for Malaysia is in November 2018. Important date to note is the deadline of civil society/NGO submissions is 22/3/2018.
Here we recollect what was said about 'Death Penalty' - what some of the different countries recommended to Malaysia, and Malaysia's response to these recommendations...
Recommendations 146.105, 146.107,146.116 and 146.127: The research arm of the Attorney-General’s Chambers is currently undertaking a comprehensive study to examine the legal and policy frameworks related to the application of the death penalty in Malaysia, scheduled for completion by end 2014. The findings and recommendations of the study will subsequently be presented to the Government for policy consideration and decision. In light of such developments, Malaysia is currently not in a position to commit to put in place an alternative to the death penalty and to establish a moratorium on its application. Malaysia has discontinued application of the death penalty on minors. Under current law, drug dealers and drug traffickers may still be subject to the death penalty.Recommendations 146.108, 146.109, 146.110, 146.111, 146.112, 146.113, 146.114, 146.115, 146.117, 146.118, 146.119, 146.120, 146.121, 146.122, 146.123 and 146.124: Malaysia reaffirms the understanding that the death penalty is not prohibited under international law and further reiterates that matters pertaining to the administration of justice fall under the State’s sovereign authority and jurisdiction. Malaysia further notes that several retentionist States that have previously imposed voluntarily moratorium on the death penalty have recently reintroduced its application. Given that a comprehensive study is currently being undertaken by the Government on this matter, Malaysia is presently not in a position to accept these recommendations.
Malaysia
– UPR – What other nation states asked of Malaysia – Death Penalty
Sweden noted the
declining rate of executions, but noted their continuation despite the
announcement of a review of the mandatory death penalty and a temporary
moratorium.
Switzerland
called for a moratorium on the death penalty.
Argentina
encouraged Malaysia to continue collaboration with organizations addressing
refugees and asylum seekers and work towards abolition of the death penalty.
Kazakhstan welcomed
the trend towards a moratorium on the death penalty. It called on Malaysia to
consider a comprehensive reform of administration of criminal justice, including
the death penalty.
Maintain its good example in
observing the legal safeguards surrounding the application of death penalty (Egypt)
Consider reducing the number of crimes
for which the capital punishment may be handed, including non-violent crimes,
as well as establishing a moratorium on the use of the death penalty (Cyprus)
Reduce the number of crimes subject
to death penalty and eliminate the compulsory application of the death penalty
(Belgium);
146.105.
Remain open and continue the engagement
with the public on the death penalty matter, including on possible alternatives
to the death penalty and its abolishing (Ukraine);
146.106.
Maintain its good example in
observing the legal safeguards surrounding the application of death penalty (Egypt);
146.107.
Carry out the necessary nation-wide
consultations to find an alternative to the death penalty, and, as far as
possible, explore the possibility of establishing a moratorium on the capital
punishment (Ecuador);
146.108.
Finalize the review of the mandatory
nature of the death penalty, maintain a moratorium and ultimately move to
abolish the death penalty (Australia);
146.109.
Take practical steps towards the
abolishment of the death penalty, and as a first step officially introduce a
moratorium on the implementation of death sentences (Bulgaria);
146.110.
Broaden the review of the death
penalty with a view of eliminating mandatory death sentencing for capital
offences and commute all death sentences to terms of imprisonment (Sweden);
146.111.
Consider reducing the number of crimes
for which the capital punishment may be handed, including non-violent crimes,
as well as establishing a moratorium on the use of the death penalty (Cyprus);
146.112.
Reduce the number of crimes subject
to death penalty and eliminate the compulsory application of the death penalty
(Belgium);
146.113.
Limit, as long as the death penalty
persists in the country, its application to the most serious crimes, leaving
drug trade while recognizing its seriousness, outside this category (Spain);
146.114.
Bring legislation on the death
penalty in line with international minimum standards, in particular by
abolishing mandatory death penalty and the death penalty for drug-related
offences, and take steps to approving a moratorium with a view to eventual
abolition (Germany);
146.115.
Move to discretionary sentencing for
drug trafficking charges (United Kingdom
of Great Britain and Northern Ireland);
146.116.
Abolish death penalty for minors and
drug dealers (Albania);
146.117.
Repeal compulsory death penalty and
eliminate its application for drug related offences(Switzerland);
146.118.
Reinstate a moratorium on executions
(Belgium);
146.119.
Establish a moratorium on the death
penalty (Mexico);
146.120.
Adopt a moratorium on the execution
of the death penalty, with a view to a final abolition of the death penalty (Spain);
121.
Immediately establish an official moratorium
on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty (Norway);
146.122.
Establish a moratorium on the use of
the death penalty with a view to abolishing capital punishment for all crimes (Montenegro);
146.123.
Establish a moratorium on executions
of those sentenced to the death penalty and move forward in the legal review to
reach its abolition (Chile);
146.124.
Instate an official moratorium on
executions with a view to abolishing capital punishment, abolish the automatic
sentencing to capital punishment for drug traffickers and commute all capital
punishments to life prison sentences (France);
*As extracts were taken from the relevant document, there may be recommendations made by some countries not reflected here.
MALAYSIA'S RESPONSE TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS
Report of the Working Group
on the Universal Periodic Review*
Malaysia
Addendum
Views on conclusions and/or
recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under
review
1. The Government of Malaysia
reaffirms its commitment to the principles and purposes of the UPR which it
views as an important intergovernmental process that could contribute
significantly towards improving human rights at the domestic level, inter alia,
by providing a platform for transparent, positive and constructive dialogue.
2. The following sets out the Government of Malaysia’s
views on conclusions and/or recommendations made during Malaysia’s
Second Universal Periodic Review (UPR) on 24 October 2013 and which appear in
paragraphs 146.1–146.232 of the draft UPR outcome report namely document
A/HRC/25/10.
3. The Government has carefully examined all 232
recommendations in consultation with all relevant Federal agencies, State
Governments as well as other stakeholders including the National Human Rights
Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) and other civil society organisations and is
pleased to report that Malaysia
is able to support 149 recommendations. In particular, 113 recommendations are
accepted in full, 21 recommendations are accepted in principle and 15 recommendations
are accepted in part.
4. In general, recommendations accepted in full
indicate Malaysia’s
support for the spirit and the principle(s) underpinning those recommendations
as well as its ability to implement them. Recommendations accepted in principle indicate
that Malaysia is taking
steps towards achieving the objectives of the recommendations but disagrees
with the specific actions proposed; or that certain recommendations have already been
implemented or are in the process of being implemented; or that Malaysia is not in a position to
implement at this juncture. The Government’s position on recommendations accepted in part is
clarified in paragraph 8 below. The Government underscores that all
recommendations accepted ‘in principle’ and ‘in part’ will be kept in full view
alongside recommendations that are fully accepted and will be revisited in
accordance with national priorities and needs.
5. Recommendations that do not enjoy Malaysia’s
support are generally those which call for immediate changes to existing laws,
regulations and policies or touch on matters which the Government is not in a
position to consider or commit to implement at this juncture. Malaysia is
also unable to support certain recommendations that are based on factual
inaccuracies or on mistaken underlying assumptions on the situation in the country.
Malaysia’s
position on certain recommendations which do not enjoy its support is further
clarified in paragraph 10 below. While unable to accept certain
recommendations, Malaysia
does not completely reject the possibility of revisiting those recommendations,
as appropriate.
6. Recommendations that Malaysia fully
accepts:
146.37, 146.38, 146.44, 146.45, 146.51, 146.52,
146.53, 146.54, 146.55, 146.57, 146.58, 146.59, 146.60, 146.61, 146.62, 146.63,
146.64, 146.65, 146.66, 146.67, 146.68, 146.69, 146.70, 146.71, 146.72, 146.73,
146.74, 146.75, 146.78, 146.79, 146.80, 146.81, 146.82, 146.83, 146.84, 146.85,
146.86, 146.87, 146.88, 146.89, 146.90, 146.91, 146.92, 146.93, 146.95,
146.106, 146.128, 146.131, 146.132, 146.133, 146.134, 146.135, 146.136,
146.137, 146.138, 146.139, 146.140, 146.141, 146.142, 146.143, 146.147,
146.149, 146.154, 146.163, 146.164, 146.170, 146.171, 146.172, 146.173,
146.175, 146.176, 146.177, 146.178, 146.179, 146.180, 146.181, 146.182,
146.183, 146.184, 146.185, 146.186, 146.188, 146.189, 146.190, 146.191,
146.192, 146.194, 146.195, 146.196, 146.197, 146.198, 146.199, 146.200,
146.201, 146.202, 146.204, 146.205, 146.206, 146.207, 146.208, 146.214,
146.215, 146.216, 146.222, 146.223, 146.224, 146.226, 146.227, 146.228,
146.229, 146.230, 146.231 and 146.232.
7. Recommendations that Malaysia
accepts in principle:
146.1, 146.5, 146.9, 146.11, 146.14, 146.20,
146.22, 146.23 and 146.24, 146.26, 146.27, 146.48, 146.49, 146.77, 146.94,
146.96, 146.97, 146.125, 146.153, 146.160, 146.169 and 146.187.
8. Malaysia partially accepts the
recommendations below and offers the following clarifications:
Recommendation 146.7: Malaysia has
acceded to the First and Second Optional Protocols to the Convention on the
Rights of the Child (CRC) on 12 April 2012. Malaysia has no immediate plans to
accede to the Third Optional Protocol to the CRC.
Recommendation 146.39: Malaysia
reaffirms its commitment to continue cooperating with the Council’s Special
Procedures including by accepting official visits. Among the Special Procedures
that have undertaken official visits to Malaysia in the recent past include
the Special Rapporteur on the right to education, Working Group on Arbitrary
Detention and the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. Numerous other
mandate holders have visited Malaysia
unofficially without restriction. Malaysia is open to further
considering extending a standing invitation to the Special Procedures, however
it has no immediate plans to do so.
Recommendation 146.76: The Human Rights
Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) has been regularly conducting human rights
training for police officers and other law enforcement personnel. In addition,
the Royal Malaysian Police (RMP) undertakes continuous training to ensure that
their actions are in conformity with international human rights standards. RMP
has in place a number of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) towards this end.
Most recently, RMP has adopted SOPs concerning implementation of security
legislation and on the facilitation of peaceful assemblies under the Security
Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 and the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012,
respectively. Malaysia
is presently not in a position to immediately sign and ratify the Convention
Against Torture (CAT).
Recommendations
146.105, 146.107,146.116 and 146.127: The research arm of the
Attorney-General’s Chambers is currently undertaking a comprehensive study to
examine the legal and policy frameworks related to the application of the death
penalty in Malaysia, scheduled for completion by end 2014. The findings and
recommendations of the study will subsequently be presented to the Government
for policy consideration and decision. In light of such developments, Malaysia is
currently not in a position to commit to put in place an alternative to the
death penalty and to establish a moratorium on its application. Malaysia has
discontinued application of the death penalty on minors. Under current law,
drug dealers and drug traffickers may still be subject to the death penalty.
Malaysia rejects the assertion that seeks to equate torture, inhuman, cruel or
degrading treatment or punishment with corporal punishment including whipping
and other forms of punishment as prescribed under existing laws which are
carried out only upon direction by the Courts and which remain valid and legal
forms of punishment in the country.
Recommendation 146.130: The Domestic Violence
Act 1994 [Act 521] was enacted to curb the use of violence by a person against
his/her spouse as well as provides a platform for victims to seek protection and
justice. Act 521 was amended in 2011 to widen the definition of “domestic
violence” to cover emotional, mental and psychological abuses. The concept of
marital rape is not recognised in Malaysia’s legal system. That
notwithstanding, Section 375A of the Penal Code was enacted to prevent husbands
from causing hurt or the fear of death to his wife in order to have sexual
intercourse with her.
Recommendation 146.148: This recommendation
enjoys Malaysia’s
support to the extent that it is compatible with national laws and policies and
its obligations under applicable international instruments. Relevant government
agencies and SUHAKAM have conducted seminars, workshops and training programmes
to promote awareness and education in relation to human rights to police
officers and other enforcement agencies. Malaysia is committed to maintain
effective mechanisms to ensure an independent investigation of alleged
misconduct by government officials, including law enforcement personnel. One
such mechanism is the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC)
established in 2009 aimed at addressing public complaints against law
enforcement personnel, including police, immigration, customs and other
Government authorities. Additionally, the Government established the Malaysian
Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in 2008 to effectively and efficiently manage
the nation’s anti-corruption efforts.
Recommendation 146.150 and 146.151: Malaysia is of the view that this recommendation
is factually inaccurate as early, forced and child marriage has never been a
trend in Malaysia.
Under the civil law, statutory minimum age of marriage has been fixed at 18
years old. However, a female who has attained the age of 16 years may
nevertheless be married through authorization granted by the Chief Minister.
Under the parallel Syariah legal
system, no marriage may be solemnized where either the male is under 18 or the
female is under 16 except where the Syariah
Judge has granted his permission in writing in certain circumstances. Section
22(6) of the Law Reform (Marriage & Divorce) Act 1976 (LRA) provides that
marriages shall not be solemnized unless both parties freely consent to the
marriage. Similarly, the Syariah law
does not recognize forced marriage and a marriage without consent or performed
under coercion is considered void and can be annulled. Malaysia
believes in the importance of preserving and upholding the sanctity of marriage
between man and woman and of the family institution.
Recommendation 146.155: Currently, Malaysia has in
place mechanisms for interreligious dialogue. The Government remains committed
to continue its engagement on religious issues taking into account the relevant
constitutional provisions relating to Islam and in accordance with national
laws, policies and domestic circumstances. The Government is not in a position
to consider establishing a structured interfaith dialogue at this juncture.
Recommendation 146.193: Malaysia
provides education to children in the country in accordance with the present
national legal framework and policies.
Recommendation146.217 and 146.218: Measures
undertaken by the Government are confined to legal and documented foreign
workers, subject to the different rights of nationals and non-nationals. While Malaysia will
continue to safeguard the rights of legal and documented foreign workers, it
has no immediate plans to enact additional legislation such as specific laws on
foreign workers.
9. The following recommendations do not enjoy Malaysia’s
support:
146.2, 146.3, 146.4,
146.6, 146.8, 146.10, 146.12, 146.13, 146.15, 146.16, 146.17, 146.18, 146.19,
146.21, 146.25, 146.28, 146.98, 146.99, 146.100, 146.101, 146.102, 146.103,
146.104, 146.129, 146.40, 146.41, 146.42, 146.43, 146.145, 146.146, 146.152,
146.156, 146.157, 146.158, 146.159, 146.166, 146.167, 146.168, 146.203,
146.209, 146.210, 146.211 and 146.225
10. Malaysia
offers the following clarifications on recommendations which do not enjoy its
support as listed below:
Recommendations 146.29, 146.30, 146.31, 146.32,
146.33 and 146.35: Presently, Malaysia
has no plans to lift its reservations to the Convention on the Rights of the
Child (CRC), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW) and Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
(CRPD). The Government underscores that such reservations do not run counter to
the intent and purpose of those instruments and were made taking into account
relevant constitutional provisions and the Islamic (Syariah) law which together form an integral part of the country’s
legal framework.
Recommendation 146.34: Malaysia has
taken steps to ensure that capital punishment is not imposed on persons under
18, in particular by rescinding the Essential (Security Cases) Regulations
which ceased to have effect from 21 June 2012. The Government is currently
reviewing its policy with a view to abolish practice of caning of children in
schools.
Recommendation 146.36: The Government remains
committed to take progressive steps in improving Malaysia’s compliance with
international human rights standards. Such standards are given effect at the
domestic level by among others the enactment of certain new laws and through
the review of existing laws and policies.
Recommendations 146.46, 146.212 and 146.213 (on
situation of indigenous peoples): Malaysia continues to take steps to
better protect and respect the human rights of its indigenous population.
Towards this end, SUHAKAM had undertaken an independent National Inquiry into
the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the findings and recommendations of
which were submitted to the Government in August 2013. Currently, a Task Force
comprising senior government officials, civil society representatives and
academicians are in the process of determining, inter alia, details on which recommendations can be implemented in the
short, medium and long term. The Government is committed to ensure that the report would be reviewed
in a balanced and positive manner and takes into account the best interests of Malaysia’s
indigenous peoples. The Task Force’s recommendations would be the platform for
the formulation of a blueprint for the proposed reforms of indigenous land and
policies once approved by the Cabinet. As the Government does not wish to
pre-judge the outcome of the Task Force’s deliberations, Malaysia is
unable to accept these recommendations at this juncture.
Recommendation 146.47: Malaysia has no
plans to review the recent amendments to the Prevention of Crime Act 1959. Malaysia
reiterates that human rights norms and standards were taken into consideration
when proposing amendments to the Act including on the issuance of detention
orders by the Prevention of Crime Board and on the possibility of judicial
review of decision of the Board.
Recommendation 146.50: Article 121(1A) of the
Federal Constitution which states, inter alia, that the High Courts shall have
no jurisdiction in respect of any matter within the jurisdiction of the Syariah courts clearly demarcates the
jurisdiction of the two legal systems in Malaysia. As such, Malaysia reaffirms that there is no conflict of
competence between the Civil and Syariah
Courts in Malaysia.
Recommendation 146.56: Malaysia is
unable to support this recommendation as it has been overtaken by events.
Recommendations of the 2005 Royal Commission on the establishment of an
Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission were duly considered by
the Government leading to the establishment of the EAIC in 2009.
Recommendations
146.108, 146.109, 146.110, 146.111, 146.112, 146.113, 146.114, 146.115,
146.117, 146.118, 146.119, 146.120, 146.121, 146.122, 146.123 and 146.124:
Malaysia reaffirms the understanding that the death penalty is not prohibited
under international law and further reiterates that matters pertaining to the
administration of justice fall under the State’s sovereign authority and
jurisdiction. Malaysia
further notes that several retentionist States that have previously imposed
voluntarily moratorium on the death penalty have recently reintroduced its
application. Given that a comprehensive study is currently being undertaken by
the Government on this matter, Malaysia
is presently not in a position to accept these recommendations.
Recommendation 146.126: Corporal punishment is
a form of punishment provided for under existing laws in Malaysia. It is
only imposed on serious offences and is only carried pursuant to the order of
the courts. Malaysia is
unable to support this recommendation as it equates torture, cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment and punishment with corporal punishment which is a valid
and legal form of punishment in Malaysia.
Recommendation 146.144: Malaysia does
not detain victims of trafficking in persons. However, such victims are
required to reside in shelters provided for and gazetted by the Government with
a view to afford them better protection and safety. The Government provides
income-generating facilities and programmes in such shelters in order to
further assist such victims.
Recommendation 146.161: Amendments to the
Printing Presses and Publication Act (PPPA) introduced in 2012 clearly
establishes the element of “right to be heard” before decisions on revoking or
suspending media licenses or permits.
Recommendation 146.162: At present, Malaysia is not
party to the ICCPR. Article 10 of the Federal Constitution provides for the
exercise of the right to freedom of speech, subject to certain restrictions
which are in consonance with international human rights standards. Malaysia
maintains that certain restrictions provided for under the Sedition Act and the
PPPA are in line with the permissible limitations under the relevant
international human rights instruments.
Recommendation 146.165: The Peaceful Assembly
Act 2012 was enacted to ensure that all citizens have the right to organize
assemblies or to participate in assemblies, peaceably and without arms. Malaysia has no
plans to revise this Act at this juncture.
Recommendation 146.174: Negotiations on the
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) are currently underway. At this
juncture, Malaysia
is of the view that it would be premature to prejudge the outcome of those
negotiations.
Recommendations 146.219, 146.220 and 146.221:
Protection scope for migrant workers in Malaysia extends to documented
foreign workers excluding their family members. Every person entering Malaysia,
including undocumented migrants are subject to the applicable laws and
regulations including the Immigration Act and are afforded protection under the
law, as appropriate. Malaysia
maintains that decisions on the possible naturalisation or the regularisation
of status of aliens residing in the country is a sovereign matter.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment