TAKE STERN ACTION AGAINST POLICE FOR TORTURE OF SUSPECT
- torture incident witnessed by lawyer & 2 others -
Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET) is shocked by the recent revelation of torture at the Banting District Police headquarters on 28 October 2005 (as reported in the New Straits Times 29/10/2005). The suspect’s mouth was gagged with a white tape/plaster and his arm was being pulled upwards behind him and he was crying in pain.
This harrowing incident was witnessed by a lawyer and 2 others. All three eye-witnesses immediately lodged police reports about the incident.
We also view with great concern that the reaction of the Officer in Charge of the Police District(OCPD) of Banting, Superintendent Shah Gzali Khan, was to deny the allegations, even before proper investigations have been commenced. His denial and his threats of action against the complainants was reported in the NST of 29/10/2005.
It bodes ill for the nation that the uniformed protectors of the public are terrorizing and torturing persons in violation of the law and human decency.
All those involved in this atrocity, including those police officers who stood by and did nothing to prevent it , must be brought to justice.
We demand the following:-
a) That the Inspector General of Police (IGP) appoint an independent police team to investigate this matter;
b) That the Home Affairs Minister and the IGP take urgent steps to put an end to custodial torture by police personnel in police stations throughout the country
c) That the government immediately sets up a permanent independent body to investigate complaints of abuse or torture perpetrated by the police.
d) That the victim of torture be identified and be justly compensated.
Charles Hector
Salbiah Ahmad
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
10th November 2005
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Tuesday, April 19, 2005
MADPET(19/4/05) STOP HANGING OF SINGAPORE TWINS' FATHER
STOP HANGING OF SINGAPORE TWINS’ FATHER
We note with concern and sadness the case of 14 year old Singaporean twins Gopalan and Krishnan Murugesu, who have been tramping the streets of the city-state seeking public support for a petition against the execution of their father. Their father Shanmugam Murugesu was sentenced to death for drug possession and will be executed unless Singapore President S.R.Nathan grants his petition for clemency. This heart-rending case well illustrates the evil caused by the infliction of the death penalty.
The death penalty is an extremely cruel and degrading form of punishment.The condemned person not only suffers from the barbarity of the execution itself, but also the cruelty of waiting upon death row for the day he is to be methodically killed by the state.
It has never been proven that the imposition of the death penalty reduces the incidence of crime. On the other hand, there is overwhelming proof of the horrendous impact of the death penalty upon the loved ones of thecondemned person.
These two young boys will almost certainly be seriously traumatized by the killing of their father by the State, particularly since he is the only parent they have. They are mere children who should be in school or at theplayground, and living the carefree existence of childhood. Instead, they are walking the streets of Singapore, begging for their's father's life. How can the State of Singapore justify this?
Justice that is not tempered with mercy is nothing more than the brute unfeeling exercise of force by the State. In the name of pity and human dignity, and for the sake of these suffering children, we call upon His Excellency President S.R. Nathan to grant the clemency petition of Shanmugam Murugesu.
We also call upon the government of Singapore to immediately impose a moratorium upon all executions, as a first step towards final abolition of the death penalty.
N. Surendran
Charles Hector
Salbiah Ahmad
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
19th April 2005
We note with concern and sadness the case of 14 year old Singaporean twins Gopalan and Krishnan Murugesu, who have been tramping the streets of the city-state seeking public support for a petition against the execution of their father. Their father Shanmugam Murugesu was sentenced to death for drug possession and will be executed unless Singapore President S.R.Nathan grants his petition for clemency. This heart-rending case well illustrates the evil caused by the infliction of the death penalty.
The death penalty is an extremely cruel and degrading form of punishment.The condemned person not only suffers from the barbarity of the execution itself, but also the cruelty of waiting upon death row for the day he is to be methodically killed by the state.
It has never been proven that the imposition of the death penalty reduces the incidence of crime. On the other hand, there is overwhelming proof of the horrendous impact of the death penalty upon the loved ones of thecondemned person.
These two young boys will almost certainly be seriously traumatized by the killing of their father by the State, particularly since he is the only parent they have. They are mere children who should be in school or at theplayground, and living the carefree existence of childhood. Instead, they are walking the streets of Singapore, begging for their's father's life. How can the State of Singapore justify this?
Justice that is not tempered with mercy is nothing more than the brute unfeeling exercise of force by the State. In the name of pity and human dignity, and for the sake of these suffering children, we call upon His Excellency President S.R. Nathan to grant the clemency petition of Shanmugam Murugesu.
We also call upon the government of Singapore to immediately impose a moratorium upon all executions, as a first step towards final abolition of the death penalty.
N. Surendran
Charles Hector
Salbiah Ahmad
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
19th April 2005
Saturday, April 09, 2005
MADPET(9/4/05) POLICE MUST STOP HUMILIATING ARRESTED PERSONS
Police Must STOP Humiliating Arrested Persons
We are shocked that the Federal CID Director Comm. Datuk Fauzi Shaari has defended the action of police in giving crew-cuts to arrested persons detained at police station lock-ups. It must be remembered that persons detained at police lock-ups are mere suspects pending investigation. Many a time arrested persons are released in a couple of hours or days after police investigations show that they are not involved in the crime they are suspected to have committed.In his statement reported in the Star (9/4/2005), Datuk Fauzi Shaari absurdly claims that the crew-cuts are necessary for hygiene and discipline reasons.
In claiming that the crew-cuts are necessary for discipline reasons, Datok Fauzi Shaari clearly exhibits the police department’s inveterate inability to understand that arrested persons are not convicts and are innocent until proven guilty. The police have no right to humiliate arrested persons in this manner in order to impose discipline. It is not the task of the police department to teach discipline to the Malaysian public.
It is time the police realize that in this country arrested persons cannot be treated as if they were inmates of notorious penal institutions such as Chekhov’s Island of Sakhalin or the Gulag Archipelago or Devil’s Island. This seems obvious to everyone except the police department who appear to think that it is permissible to treat arrested suspects as if they were hardened convicts.
As regard Datok Fauzi’s claim that crew-cuts are necessary for hygiene purposes, we take this as an admission that police lock-ups are unhygienic places. It is undeniable that lock-ups in Malaysia are generally smelly, dirty, over-crowded and lacking adequate toilet and bathroom facilities. The police department ought to take the initiative to improve conditions instead of giving crew-cuts to detainees
In addition, the time of the police department is better spent investigating and solving crimes instead of posing as ‘barbers’ to arrested persons.
It is unacceptable that the Federal CID Chief should think that he has the right to treat Malaysians in this manner and for these reasons.
We demand that the practice of giving hair-cuts to arrested persons immediately cease as it is humiliating and is an affront to human dignity.
N. Surendran
Charles Hector
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
9th April 2005
Kuala Lumpur
We are shocked that the Federal CID Director Comm. Datuk Fauzi Shaari has defended the action of police in giving crew-cuts to arrested persons detained at police station lock-ups. It must be remembered that persons detained at police lock-ups are mere suspects pending investigation. Many a time arrested persons are released in a couple of hours or days after police investigations show that they are not involved in the crime they are suspected to have committed.In his statement reported in the Star (9/4/2005), Datuk Fauzi Shaari absurdly claims that the crew-cuts are necessary for hygiene and discipline reasons.
In claiming that the crew-cuts are necessary for discipline reasons, Datok Fauzi Shaari clearly exhibits the police department’s inveterate inability to understand that arrested persons are not convicts and are innocent until proven guilty. The police have no right to humiliate arrested persons in this manner in order to impose discipline. It is not the task of the police department to teach discipline to the Malaysian public.
It is time the police realize that in this country arrested persons cannot be treated as if they were inmates of notorious penal institutions such as Chekhov’s Island of Sakhalin or the Gulag Archipelago or Devil’s Island. This seems obvious to everyone except the police department who appear to think that it is permissible to treat arrested suspects as if they were hardened convicts.
As regard Datok Fauzi’s claim that crew-cuts are necessary for hygiene purposes, we take this as an admission that police lock-ups are unhygienic places. It is undeniable that lock-ups in Malaysia are generally smelly, dirty, over-crowded and lacking adequate toilet and bathroom facilities. The police department ought to take the initiative to improve conditions instead of giving crew-cuts to detainees
In addition, the time of the police department is better spent investigating and solving crimes instead of posing as ‘barbers’ to arrested persons.
It is unacceptable that the Federal CID Chief should think that he has the right to treat Malaysians in this manner and for these reasons.
We demand that the practice of giving hair-cuts to arrested persons immediately cease as it is humiliating and is an affront to human dignity.
N. Surendran
Charles Hector
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
9th April 2005
Kuala Lumpur
Friday, February 25, 2005
Mkini: Do away with ‘cold-blooded’ death penalty, govt urged
Do away with ‘cold-blooded’ death penalty, govt urged
Feb 25, 05 3:22pm
The death penalty imposed on the murderer of Canny Ong Lay Kian is just as bad and unacceptable as the crime itself, said an anti-corporal punishment group in a statement today.
“(Her) murder was indisputably shocking and barbaric. However, the death penalty to the perpetrator is just as barbaric and amoral.
“The death penalty is a glaring instance of state amorality and cold-bloodedness at its worst,” said the newly-formed Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (Madpet).
On Tuesday, the Shah Alam High Court sentenced 29-year-old aircraft cabin cleaner Ahmad Najib Aris to death by hanging for the rape and murder of the US-based IT analyst in 2003.
However, Madpet accused the state of being savage by imposing the death penalty as it “reiterates the very crime it seeks to mark as reprehensible and the solution it arrives at is thus inconsequent to the problem it addresses”.
“The state-sponsored extinguishing of human lives is not a solution to the problem of the crime,” said its coordinators N Surendran, Charles Hector and Salbiah Ahmad in the statement.
They argued that studies have consistently shown that there is no evidence that the death penalty effectively deters crime and furthermore, as the punishment is irreversible, the state runs the risk of executing innocent people.
“For example, since 1973, more than 100 condemned persons have been released in the US (United States) due to credible fresh evidence,” they added.
Malaysia has hanged 358 people over the past 24 years.
Suspend executions
Madpet claims that since 1976, at least three countries a year have abolished the death penalty and that as of today over half of the world’s nations have abolished the punishment.
“This worldwide trend towards abolition is reflected by the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) resolutions calling for the suspension of all executions towards final abolition,” it added.
The UNHRC has, since 1997, passed a resolution calling on countries that have not abolished the death penalty to establish a moratorium on executions.
The latest UNHRC resolution which was adopted in April 2004, was co-sponsored by 76 UN member states and recorded its highest support figure.
Urging the Malaysian government to support the growing global stand against the death penalty, Madpet has called on it to immediately cease the “brutal punishment”.
“We call for a suspension of all executions pending abolition of the death penalty. We call for this in the name of humanity,” it added.
Madpet’s calls are in-tandem with those made by international rights organisations such as Amnesty International and the American Civil Liberties Union.
Thursday, February 24, 2005
MADPET(24/2/05) ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY
ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY
The murder of Canny Ong was indisputably shocking and barbaric. However, the death penalty meted to the perpetrator is just as barbaric and amoral. The death penalty is a glaring instance of State amorality and cold-bloodedness at its worst.
Since 1976, every year at least 3 countries have abolished the death penalty and today over half of the countries of the world have abolished the death penalty. This worldwide trend towards abolition is reflected by the UN Human Rights Commission’s Resolution calling for the suspension of all executions towards final abolition.
The State-sponsored extinguishing of human lives is not a solution to the problem of crime. Studies have consistently shown that there is no evidence that the death penalty effectively deters crime. As this punishment is irreversible, we run the horrendous risk of executing innocent persons. For example since 1973, more than 100 condemned persons have been released in the US due to credible fresh evidence.
The infliction of the death penalty upon its citizens by the State, reduces it to the level of a savage. It reiterates the very crime which it seeks to mark as reprehensible and the solution it arrives at is thus inconsequent to the problem it addresses.
The statistics in Malaysia are shocking as 358 people have been hanged over the past 24 years.
We call for an immediate cessation of this brutal punishment.
We call for a suspension of all executions pending abolition of the death penalty.
We call for this in the name of Humanity.
N. Surendran
Charles Hector
Salbiah Ahmad
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
24th February 2005
The murder of Canny Ong was indisputably shocking and barbaric. However, the death penalty meted to the perpetrator is just as barbaric and amoral. The death penalty is a glaring instance of State amorality and cold-bloodedness at its worst.
Since 1976, every year at least 3 countries have abolished the death penalty and today over half of the countries of the world have abolished the death penalty. This worldwide trend towards abolition is reflected by the UN Human Rights Commission’s Resolution calling for the suspension of all executions towards final abolition.
The State-sponsored extinguishing of human lives is not a solution to the problem of crime. Studies have consistently shown that there is no evidence that the death penalty effectively deters crime. As this punishment is irreversible, we run the horrendous risk of executing innocent persons. For example since 1973, more than 100 condemned persons have been released in the US due to credible fresh evidence.
The infliction of the death penalty upon its citizens by the State, reduces it to the level of a savage. It reiterates the very crime which it seeks to mark as reprehensible and the solution it arrives at is thus inconsequent to the problem it addresses.
The statistics in Malaysia are shocking as 358 people have been hanged over the past 24 years.
We call for an immediate cessation of this brutal punishment.
We call for a suspension of all executions pending abolition of the death penalty.
We call for this in the name of Humanity.
N. Surendran
Charles Hector
Salbiah Ahmad
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
24th February 2005
Saturday, February 19, 2005
MADPET(19/2/05) STOP ABUSES OF POWER BY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
STOP ABUSE OF POWER BY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
We are sickened by news report that Simpang Rengam District Council enforcement officers entered a private premise and brutally killed a dog, the family pet, in front of the family. The helpless animal which was a beloved family pet of 6 children was killed with shocking cruelty. Siau Mau, as it was lovingly called by the children was shot and then bludgeoned to death.
We view with grave concern the increasing instances of enforcement officials who abuse their power and easily resort to the use of guns.
In a notorious incident in Penang in mid- January, Yeoh Yew Jin, a 19 year old alleged VCD seller was shot in the chest by enforcement personnel. The shot also injured a 52 year old innocent by-stander having his dinner at a nearby coffee shop.
Despite a public outcry following this incident, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi made a poorly reasoned decision to continue to allow enforcement officers to bear firearms.
His decision showed a disturbing lack of sensitivity to the interest and safety of the general public and is inconsistent with his professed people friendly and transparent administration.
We are further shocked that the Simpang Rengam District Council enforcement officers had abused their power by trespassing into a private citizens home and destroying private property.
We call upon the authorities to take swift and stern action against those involved in this shameful incident. There must be no hesitation to charge in court those guilty of wrongdoing for cruelty to an animal, criminal trespass and destruction of private property.
We also call upon the Prime Minister to re-consider his decision to allow enforcement officers to carry arms as it is not certain that they are able to bear this responsibility without endangering the Malaysian public.
N. Surendran
Charles Hector
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
19th February 2005
We are sickened by news report that Simpang Rengam District Council enforcement officers entered a private premise and brutally killed a dog, the family pet, in front of the family. The helpless animal which was a beloved family pet of 6 children was killed with shocking cruelty. Siau Mau, as it was lovingly called by the children was shot and then bludgeoned to death.
We view with grave concern the increasing instances of enforcement officials who abuse their power and easily resort to the use of guns.
In a notorious incident in Penang in mid- January, Yeoh Yew Jin, a 19 year old alleged VCD seller was shot in the chest by enforcement personnel. The shot also injured a 52 year old innocent by-stander having his dinner at a nearby coffee shop.
Despite a public outcry following this incident, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi made a poorly reasoned decision to continue to allow enforcement officers to bear firearms.
His decision showed a disturbing lack of sensitivity to the interest and safety of the general public and is inconsistent with his professed people friendly and transparent administration.
We are further shocked that the Simpang Rengam District Council enforcement officers had abused their power by trespassing into a private citizens home and destroying private property.
We call upon the authorities to take swift and stern action against those involved in this shameful incident. There must be no hesitation to charge in court those guilty of wrongdoing for cruelty to an animal, criminal trespass and destruction of private property.
We also call upon the Prime Minister to re-consider his decision to allow enforcement officers to carry arms as it is not certain that they are able to bear this responsibility without endangering the Malaysian public.
N. Surendran
Charles Hector
for Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET)
19th February 2005
Thursday, February 03, 2005
Mkini - Gov't reveals execution statistics: 358 hanged in 24 years
Gov't reveals execution statistics: 358 hanged in 24 years
Feb 3, 05 8:56am
The government has revealed that it executed 358 people by hanging in the past 24 years, parliamentary opposition leader Lim Kit Siang said today.
Lim said he had received the statistics from Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who is also Minister for Internal Security, in response to a written question submitted in parliament.
Figures for the number of executions in Malaysia have rarely been published, and media attempts to establish the number in recent years were rebuffed.
The death penalty is imposed in Malaysia for a number of offences from murder and treason to drug trafficking, for which it is mandatory.
Lim, who leads the biggest opposition party in parliament, the Democratic Action Party, said the prisons department had provided him with a statistical breakdown of just 234 of the hangings.
This showed that 50 foreign nationals were hanged, including seven from Thailand, eight from Hong Kong, 23 from the Philippines, four from Singapore, two from Indonesia and one each from Australia, Britain and Pakistan.
Forty-six of them were hanged for drug offences.
Of 184 Malaysian citizens executed, 48 were from the indigenous Malay majority, 102 were members of the ethnic Chinese minority and 15 were ethnic Indians. Most of the executions - 129 - were also for drug offences.
Five of the 234 people hanged were women.
12 hanged under ISA
Twelve of the executions were for offences under the Internal Security Act (ISA), all between 1984 and 1993. Lim told AFP he could not immediately account for the number of hangings for security offences in such a concentrated period.
The act, most widely known for the powers it gives the authorities to detain people without trial, also prescribes the mandatory death penalty for certain offences to be tried in court, including carrying firearms, ammunition or explosives "in any security area".
The ISA was introduced by former British colonisers to fight a communist insurgency in the 1950s, and has been used more recently to detain without trial more than 80 suspected Islamic militants.
The number of executions overall, according to the limited figures released by the prisons department, reached a peak of 31 in 1990 while just 15 had been hanged since 2000. None were executed last year, according to these statistics.
Lim said the period between the end of all appeals and the carrying out of the sentence varied from less than a year to more than four years.
- AFP
Feb 3, 05 8:56am
The government has revealed that it executed 358 people by hanging in the past 24 years, parliamentary opposition leader Lim Kit Siang said today.
Lim said he had received the statistics from Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who is also Minister for Internal Security, in response to a written question submitted in parliament.
Figures for the number of executions in Malaysia have rarely been published, and media attempts to establish the number in recent years were rebuffed.
The death penalty is imposed in Malaysia for a number of offences from murder and treason to drug trafficking, for which it is mandatory.
Lim, who leads the biggest opposition party in parliament, the Democratic Action Party, said the prisons department had provided him with a statistical breakdown of just 234 of the hangings.
This showed that 50 foreign nationals were hanged, including seven from Thailand, eight from Hong Kong, 23 from the Philippines, four from Singapore, two from Indonesia and one each from Australia, Britain and Pakistan.
Forty-six of them were hanged for drug offences.
Of 184 Malaysian citizens executed, 48 were from the indigenous Malay majority, 102 were members of the ethnic Chinese minority and 15 were ethnic Indians. Most of the executions - 129 - were also for drug offences.
Five of the 234 people hanged were women.
12 hanged under ISA
Twelve of the executions were for offences under the Internal Security Act (ISA), all between 1984 and 1993. Lim told AFP he could not immediately account for the number of hangings for security offences in such a concentrated period.
The act, most widely known for the powers it gives the authorities to detain people without trial, also prescribes the mandatory death penalty for certain offences to be tried in court, including carrying firearms, ammunition or explosives "in any security area".
The ISA was introduced by former British colonisers to fight a communist insurgency in the 1950s, and has been used more recently to detain without trial more than 80 suspected Islamic militants.
The number of executions overall, according to the limited figures released by the prisons department, reached a peak of 31 in 1990 while just 15 had been hanged since 2000. None were executed last year, according to these statistics.
Lim said the period between the end of all appeals and the carrying out of the sentence varied from less than a year to more than four years.
- AFP