Monday, February 10, 2025

If Anwar cares about Najib’s suffering, what about Malaysians facing death overseas? (Malaysia Now)

 

If Anwar cares about Najib’s suffering, what about Malaysians facing death overseas?

It is of no use to find out that one is is innocent after being executed.

Charles Hector

Last month, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said he did not wish for former prime minister Najib Razak to suffer in prison.

The compassion is welcome, but does it also apply to all Malaysians, especially those facing execution in other countries, like Pannir Selvam Pranthaman.

More than 70 Malaysians are facing execution in other countries for various offences.-

What is Malaysia doing to prevent Malaysians from being killed?

Has the government done its best to prevent Malaysians from being executed abroad, including in Singapore?

Hopefully, efforts have been made for Malaysians who are at risk of being executed, regardless of their socio-economic status or ethnicity.

Has Malaysia helped to prevent executions by way of legal assistance?

Malaysia has abolished the mandatory death penalty and the Federal Court has commuted the death sentences of hundreds of prisoners on death row.

In December 2024, Malaysia voted in favour of the UN General Assembly resolution on a moratorium on executions pending the abolition of the death penalty, a position Malaysia has held since 2018. Such a resolution is, of course, binding on all UN member states, including Singapore.

Malaysia is therefore obliged to take efforts to abolish the death penalty in Malaysia and also to act urgently to save the lives of Malaysians facing the death penalty in other countries, including Singapore.

Pannir is at risk of being executed any day now. Given the fact that in Singapore, a person can be executed after only four days' notice, it is all the more urgent for Anwar to act fast to save Malaysian lives.

A prison sentence is more than a sufficient penalty, and there is no reason to take someone’s God-given life – and, more importantly, there is always the risk of a miscarriage of justice.

It is of no use if after the execution it turns out that someone is innocent, as in the case of Chiang Kuo-ching, who was found innocent after his execution in Taiwan in 1997.

Singapore should provide all access to court easily, and not make it more difficult, because there is always the possibility that new evidence and arguments will emerge that will lead the courts to acquit or change the judgement.

Malaysia also has the International Transfer of Prisoners Act 2012 and relevant treaties with countries where Malaysians are currently at risk of being sentenced to death, such as the Singapore-Malaysia Prisoner Transfer Agreement to bring prisoners back to Malaysia.

As chair of Asean, Malaysia should advocate for a moratorium on executions and ultimately the abolition of the death penalty.

As Anwar makes many trips abroad to meet with other heads of state, it is hoped that he will also give serious thought to how he can prevent Malaysians from being deprived of their lives.

Charles Hector is part of Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (Madpet) - Malaysia Now, 10/2/2025

 

Sunday, February 09, 2025

PM Anwar Ibrahim’s cares about Najib’s sufferings in prison but does Malaysia also care about Malaysians overseas at threat of being executed to death like Pannir Selvam - use Treaties and 'Good Relations"

Media Statement -10/2/2025

PM Anwar Ibrahim’s cares about Najib’s sufferings in prison but does Malaysia also care about Malaysians overseas at threat of being executed to death like Pannir Selvam

Use Malaysia’s good relations and treaties like Singapore-Malaysia Prisoner Transfer Treaty to save lives at risk of being judicially executed.

Of late, ‘..Anwar Ibrahim reportedly said he does not wish for disgraced former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to suffer in prison like he did…’(Malay Mail, 21/1/2025). The Prime Minister’s ‘compassion’ is good, but does it extend to all Malaysians, more so Malaysians at threat of being executed in other countries like Pannir Selvam, a Malaysian Christian.

There are more than 70 Malaysians at risk of being executed in other countries for various offence, and most recently highlighted was Malaysian Paneer Selvam, at risk of being executed in Singapore any time now. ‘Seventy-four Malaysians have been sentenced to death abroad for drug trafficking offences as of early this month, according to Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan. He said that these death sentences were carried out in Brunei, China, Indonesia, Laos, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam.’(NST, 17/10/2024) Besides drug trafficking, there will be even more Malaysians facing the death sentence in other nation states for various other crimes. Statistics are important, but what is more important is what has Malaysia done to prevent Malaysians from being killed.

Has the Malaysian government done its best to prevent Malaysians from being executed in foreign countries, including in Singapore?

The Prime Minister and the government must tell us what was done for these Malaysians at risk of being deprived of life, and also the response of these States with regard to Malaysia’s endeavors to save life.

Hopefully equal effort had been taken for all Malaysians at risk of being executed irrespective of their socio-economic status of the said persons and/or their family, religion or ethnicity. Besides diplomatic efforts, has Malaysia also assisted to prevent executions by way of legal assistance, etc.?

The government must transparently reveal efforts taken to keep Malaysians alive, safe from judicial executions.

Malaysia – Death Penalty and Moratorium on Executions

Now that Malaysia has abolished the mandatory death penalty on 4/7/2023, and even permitted the Federal Court by law to review all death penalty sentences that ended in more than 800 (but not all) death row inmate’s death sentence being revised to imprisonment.

Malaysia also once again in December 2024 voted in favour for the UN General Assembly’s Resolution on moratorium of executions pending the abolition of death penalty, a position that Malaysia has taken since 2018. Such a resolution will naturally be binding on all UN member States, including Singapore.

Thus, Malaysia now is OBLIGATED to work extra hard towards abolition of the death penalty in Malaysia, and also to act urgently to save lives of Malaysians facing the death penalty in other jurisdictions, including Singapore.

Singapore and the Death Penalty

On 14/12/2024, ‘According to news reports, 25 prisoners have been executed in Singapore since 2022, with the authorities showing little prospect of softening their approach to capital punishment for drug traffickers.’ (Al Jazeera, 14/12/2024)

It was reported in 2022, that ‘…since 2010, a total of 14 Malaysians have been on death row there with ethnic Indians making up almost three-quarters of them at 11. Two Malays and one ethnic Chinese rounded up the list.’ (Malay Mail, 29/4/2022). Malaysians that have been reported executed by Singapore include Yong Vui Kong(2013), Dinesh Pillai Reja Retnam(2014), Wilkinson A/L Primus(2014), Cheong Chun Yin(2015) and Nagaenthran K Dharmalingam(2022). At risk of being executed at any time soon are other Malaysians including one Pannir Selvam.

Given that in Singapore, a person can now be hanged to death speedily after being given a just a 4-day notice of executions makes it all the more urgent for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to act fast to save Malaysian lives. The government cannot afford to procrastinate.

Singapore has also amended its laws that makes it even more difficult to those at risk of executions to file court applications.

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture), hopes Singapore will change like Malaysia did, and not execute people anymore. Imprisonment is more than sufficient penalty, and there is no need to deprive one’s God given life – and, more importantly, there is always the risk of miscarriage of justice. It is of no use to find one is innocent after he/she has been executed like in the case of Chiang Kuo-ching who was found to be innocent after he executed in error in 1997 in Taiwan.

Singapore should provide all access to court easily, and not make it more difficult as there is always the possibility that new evidence and arguments may arise that will lead courts to acquit or vary the sentences.

Malaysia’s moral obligation to prevent Malaysians from being executed overseas

Now, Malaysia has the moral authority, to act and urge these other nations not to put Malaysians, and others, to death and to respect the United Nations General Assembly resolution to impose a moratorium on execution pending abolition, which was passed on 17/12/2024, with the support of more than two third majority, with 130 voting in favour, 22 abstentions and 32 voting in opposition. Even for UN Member States that voted against, this UN Resolution on a moratorium on execution reasonably is binding.

Malaysia also has the International Transfer of Prisoners Act 2012, and relevant treaties with countries where Malaysians are currently at risk of being sentenced to death like the Singapore-Malaysia Prisoner Transfer Treaty, to bring back prisoners back to Malaysia.

Given that Malaysia at present have a moratorium on executions, Malaysia can keep ALIVE Malaysians in other jurisdictions about to be killed if they are brought back to Malaysia.

As Chair of ASEAN, MADPET hopes that Malaysia will move ASEAN to also impose a moratorium on execution pending abolition of the death penalty.

MADPET calls on Malaysia to protect the lives of all Malaysians overseas facing the risk of judicial executions, including Pannir Selvam.

MADPET reiterates the call for the abolition of death penalty. For the next step, at least the abolition of death penalty for crimes that caused no one to die.

As Malaysian Prime Minister is famous for his international trips meeting country’s leader, it is hoped that he focusses beyond just economic matters, but seriously consider preventing Malaysian from being deprived of LIFE as is the case of those who are currently awaiting execution. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim should use Malaysia’s good relations to save.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Last Christmas for Pannir Selvam, death row inmate for drug trafficking

ByAnna Maria Romero

December 28, 2023

SINGAPORE: Pannir Selvam Pranthaman is a Malaysian prisoner on death row in Singapore for heroin trafficking. Arrested in 2014 and sentenced to death three years later, he was granted a stay of execution in 2019, one day before he was to be hanged.

In late 2021, however, the Court of Appeal dismissed his application for permission to start judicial review proceedings. And since judicial executions, which temporarily came to a halt during the COVID-19 pandemic, were resumed at the end of March 2022, Christmas of this year may likely be Pannir Selvam’s last one.

Eleven people so far have been executed in Singapore since March last year, all of whom had been convicted of drug trafficking.

His sisters, Angelia and Sangkari (Shan), recently spoke to the Malaysian national news agency Bernama about their 36-year-old brother, whom they have barely seen since he was imprisoned in Singapore.

And while chances of Pannir Selvam getting another stay of execution are very slim, the women remain steadfast.

“We cannot give up on anyone in our family. The hope is there,” Shan is quoted as saying.

Pannir’s life story…

Pannir Selvam was born in Ipoh to a Christian family in 1987, the third child out of six. His father was a pastor and lorry driver, and his mother was a housewife.

He moved to Singapore in 2010 and worked as a private security officer, later enrolling at Stamford American International School (SAIS). He continued to work, however, and even funded the university education of one of his sisters.

Pannir Selvam, then 27, was discovered carrying 51.84g of heroin into Singapore on Sept 3, 2014, and was arrested. Under Singapore law, anyone found to be illegally trafficking at least 15g of heroin when he or she is arrested faces capital punishment.

In his defence, he said that he had been acting as a drug mule for a man named “Anand” who had asked him to pass the substance to another man named “Jimmy.”

Pannir Selvam claimed he was unaware of the nature of the substance he had been asked to carry. He tried but did not qualify for the substantive assistance rule despite cooperating with authorities in Singapore.

“Pannir has been reflecting on his actions in prison. He’s expressed deep remorse about what he has done. We believe Pannir still has a lot to offer society. Inside prison, he’s been reading, self-studying, and following political news – especially developments on Malaysia Baru.

He has also become a man of faith. If given a second chance at life, he hopes to educate others on drug abuse prevention, and support prison reform programmes,” reads a website aimed at appealing to give him another chance.

A petition to save Pannir Selvam’s life has been shared online and signed by 17,000 netizens. /TISG

Read also: Halt Selvam’s execution, says Asean rights activist - The Independent Singapore, 28/12/2024

A plea for Pannir Selvam


Pannir Selvam’s early life was not one filled with crime, violence, or anything of the sort says the writer. — amnesty.org

ONE OF my best friends lives in Singapore and when I go down to visit, he’ll often take me cycling.

We often start our ride either around Marina Bay Sands or the Stadium area, being sure to pass the Marina Barrage and the Bay East Garden, before going up the East Coast Park.

It’s an absolutely gorgeous ride, with gorgeous views of gorgeous water. And if you follow the East Coast Parkway all the way to the end, you’re not far from Changi Airport, and Changi Prison.

Inside Changi Prison is a 37-year-old Malaysian gentleman by the name of Pannir Selvam Pranthaman, who will likely never experience the beauty of that simple bike ride or anything like it ever again.

Pannir Selvam is currently on death row. In 2017, he was sentenced to death after being caught crossing the border from Malaysia to Singapore with 51.84 grams of diamorphine.

Pannir Selvam’s early life was not one filled with crime, violence, or anything of the sort.

His sister, Angelia Pranthaman spoke of a childhood filled with football, running, video games, music, fashion, church camps and youth activities.

“I remember Deepavali nights were spent in my auntie’s amazing village, surrounded by fruit trees and rivers, waking up to the sweet sounds of birdsong. The night before, we would play cards, sip hot Indian teh tarik and breakfast would always be on the table, ready for us, the next day. It would often be tosai and chicken curry.”

When Pannir Selvam grew older, he started working as a warehouse assistant in Ipoh. He then eventually began working in Singapore, selling children’s educational books and working as a security guard, sometimes taking double shifts.

As has happened far too often with poor and vulnerable people, Pannir Selvam eventually found himself duped by a "friend" into carrying a package across the border.

After his arrest, he did his best to cooperate with the authorities - both on the Malaysian and Singaporean sides of the border. He provided as much information as he was able to regarding who had given him the package, who the bosses were and so on.

The Singapore High Court judge who convicted Pannir Selvam determined that he was a courier. According to Singapore’s Misuse of Drugs Act, as long as a convict is designated a courier, and has been issued a certificate by the public prosecutor stating that they cooperated with the authorities, the court then has the discretion to not impose the death penalty.

For reasons that remain baffling and extremely unclear, Pannir Selvam was denied this certificate by the public prosecutor.

This case is slightly reminiscent of the case of Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam.

In April 2009, Nagaenthran was caught at the border with 42.72 grams of drugs. He was found to have an intellectual disability, and testified that someone had threatened to kill his girlfriend and his family if he did not perform the task that was asked of him.

Despite a sustained plea for clemency by all kinds of individuals around the world, who emphasised Nagaenthran’s intellectual disability, Nagaenthran was executed in April 2022, after spending 13 years on death row.

After all these years, the primary tragedy seems to be the same: only the weakest, most vulnerable, often unaware links in the drug trade are targeted, and imposed such harsh punishments.

It seems especially tragic that while there seems to be little or no clemency for these drug mules, we can’t seem to recall a single story in which a drug kingpin or mastermind is actually ever caught or prosecuted.

No one who is advocating for clemency and, or, the abolishment of the death penalty is looking to be ‘softer’ on crime. Most are simply pleading for more proportionate penalties, and a greater focus on the true instigators that are driving this ecosystem.

And if the demand for drugs continues to remain so high, perhaps we should be looking more closely at who is driving this demand, and what can be done to stem the problem there, instead on inflicting the harshest possible punishments on the weakest and most voiceless.

At a press conference organised by Amnesty International and the Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (ADPAN) this last week, Pannir Selvam’s sister Angelia said: “Watching this right now, we feel, so weak right now. And voiceless against the big power. All I can say is, please save my brother.

"He has done all he can do. He doesn’t have to die. He has cooperated. We as a family have been having sleepless nights. We are searching for a way to save him."

Some may not be aware that in his time in prison, Pannir Selvam is still trying to touch and spread beauty in the world, especially through poetry. Here are the excerpts from two poetries composed by Pannir Selvam.

The first is a tribute to his sister Angelia:

“Angel...

Isn’t just her name,

She stays true.

In person and heart,

Just the same,

One and only lil’ sister,

Grace yet fighter,

Of the love of four brothers,

She braces even twister,

Days in, days out,

She fight so hard,

So those cold heart’s.

Can learn to warm up.”

While the second speaks to the struggle of the long, lonely wait on death row:

“In the darkness of night,

I’m bleeding by stabs of silences,

It’s been my loyal companion,

Yet still I stand with resilience,

For me, being alone,

Doesn’t mean, living alone,

I hear whispers in the wind,

Telling me to keep cope,

Voices in my mind,

Telling me to keep hope,

Learn to be strong...

Through all the streams...

In the darkness of night,

Is it possible for the fallen,

To seek the light?

Or are they doomed,

To just sit tight,

To give up without a fight?

I learned, without the dark night,

The moon can’t shine bright,

Without the dark night,

I can’t appreciate the beauty of the starlight...

Even now, they’re out of my sight,

I’ll be there when the time is right.” - Star, 9/2/2025

Silence isn’t an option: Rights groups urge Malaysia as Asean chair to call a stop on Pannir Selvam’s execution in Singapore

Amnesty International Malaysia and Adpan hosts a press cofnerence calling for a stop to Pannir Selvam's execution in Singapore. — Picture courtesy of Amnesty International Malaysia
Amnesty International Malaysia and Adpan hosts a press cofnerence calling for a stop to Pannir Selvam's execution in Singapore. — Picture courtesy of Amnesty International Malaysia

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 6 – A coalition of civil society organisations has today urged the Malaysian government to take immediate action to prevent the execution of Malaysian national Pannir Selvam Pranthaman in Singapore.

The groups said as the Asean chair, Malaysia has the opportunity to advocate against the death penalty, they said, calling for the government to intervene through diplomatic channels, including direct appeals to Singapore’s leadership.

“As a neighbouring state with close historical and diplomatic ties to Singapore, Malaysia is uniquely positioned to stand up for human rights and safeguard the rights of its nationals facing execution in the country.

“When human rights are at stake, silence is not a tenable option and all possible actions should be undertaken to halt executions and the use of the death penalty, including when it is applied in violation of international human rights law and just across our borders,” Amnesty International Malaysia and the Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (Adpan) said in a joint statement here.

The groups said that Pannir, who was convicted in 2017 of importing 51.84g of heroin into Singapore, has exhausted all legal avenues and could face execution at any time.

“Pannir’s case has been riddled with several violations of international human rights law and standards,” they said.

The groups claimed that the prosecution did not provide Pannir with a Certificate of Substantial Assistance, leaving no option for the judge but to impose the mandatory death penalty — an alleged violation of his right to a fair trial.

The organisations also criticised Singapore’s use of legal presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act, which they said shifted the burden of proof onto defendants and undermined the right to be presumed innocent.

They also highlighted Singapore’s recent acceleration of executions, with eight out of nine individuals executed in 2024 for drug-related offences, and a new law limiting the ability of death row inmates to seek legal reviews.

Pannir has spent years advocating against the death penalty from his prison cell, writing songs and poems that have been shared by Sebaran Kasih, an NGO founded by his sister. His works have been performed by Malaysian artists, including Datuk DJ Dave, Santeshh Kumar and Kidd Santhe.

The statement was endorsed by 18 other organisations, including Lawyers for Liberty, Bersih, Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram), and Sisters in Islam. It was also endorsed by several individuals, including human rights lawyer Andrew Khoo. - Malay Mail, 6/2/2025

 

Thursday, January 30, 2025

Media Statement - Police shot dead 1, some survived, Indonesia contradicts police version, Protest at Malaysian Embassy - MADPET Statement

 

Media Statement – 31/1/2025

Professional Investigation and No selective non-prosecution for police that shot and killed a man, and caused injury to several other Indonesians.

Abolish the Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC), and re-table the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) Bill

Another case of Malaysian police shooting when one was shot dead, but this time some managed to escape. Those who escaped, who were later arrested, gave a different version of what happened, contradicting what the police claimed had happened. In most of past police shooting cases, unfortunately all end up dead, no one is arrested after the encounter. No shot and arrested or arrested with no gun shots.

Police version contradicted by Indonesian government

‘Selangor police chief Datuk Hussein Omar Khan told Bernama that preliminary investigations revealed the incident occurred after an MMEA patrol boat was rammed four times by another boat, believed to belong to the suspects. In the incident, two suspects, believed to be foreigners aboard the boat, allegedly attempted to attack MMEA officers with machetes in the waters of Tanjung Rhu around 3am the same day… The MMEA located the boat and found two men inside. One was pronounced dead at the scene, while the other was critically injured and was rushed to Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital in Klang for treatment.(NST,25/1/2025)

However, the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied this version of events. ‘The ministry's director of protection of Indonesian citizens, Judha Nugraha, emphasized there was no resistance from the migrants, based on the accounts of the four survivors, who are currently being treated at Klang Hospital in Malaysia. Two of the four injured Indonesians were in stable condition when they provided a chronology of the shooting to representatives of the Indonesian Embassy in Kuala Lumpur. Both said the Indonesian workers did not try to resist arrest by wielding sharp weapons. Hence, Nugraha said, Indonesia has demanded a thorough investigation into the shooting, including the possibility of excessive use of force by the Malaysian authorities’.(Antara News, 30/1/2025)

Investigate the police, and not just the suspects, for Murder, etc

It was reported that the Malaysian police are investigating the case under Section 307 of the Penal Code for attempted murder and under Section 186 of the Penal Code for obstructing civil servants from discharging their duties.

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) believes that the case should also be investigated under Section 302(Murder) or Section 304(Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder) as someone has been killed by the police. The people who should be investigated is not just the suspects, but more importantly the Malaysian police officers that were involved in the shooting that killed and injured alleged suspects. Pending the completion of all investigations, all the said police officers ought to be suspended from duties.

Normally, suspects are arrested, but it seems none of the police officer suspects have been yet arrested. Even, after being arrested, suspects can be released on police bail, and need not be held in remand custody.

The Indonesian Government had made allegation that there may have been ‘excessive use of force’, and this a breach of the Malaysian law, as the police in affecting any arrest can only use REASONABLE or necessary force, and certainly not kill anyone while effecting an arrest. The only exception to the No Kill Rule is when the victims are persons already charged in court for very serious crimes.

Section 15(3) Criminal Procedure Code stated, ‘Nothing in this section gives a right to cause the death of a person who is not accused of an offence punishable with death or with imprisonment for a term of not less than thirty years but not exceeding forty years or with imprisonment for life.

Accused are persons already charged in court, and in this case all the said persons were not – they were just alleged suspects, and that means the police cannot kill, and if anyone ends up dead, then the police have committed a crime, and naturally must be charged in court. In court, during the trial, the police officers can raise all kinds of defence, including self defence, and it is up to Court to determine whether said police officers are guilty of murder or any other killing offences, or NOT. It is not up to the police or even the Public Prosecutor to decide the innocence of the accused.

No selective ‘non-prosecution’ just because they are police

It is true that the Public Prosecutor/Attorney General have the power to decide to charge these police officers for killing crimes or NOT – but a ‘selective’ non-prosecution when the perpetrators are police, Public Officers or Ministers also will further deteriorate the perception of Rule of Law and the fairness of the administration criminal justice system in Malaysia. It is also a violation of Art(1) 8 of the Federal Constitution that guarantees and states that ‘(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.’ No one is above the law.

Absent today are crimes for police officers that break the law

At present Malaysian laws state what a police must do and cannot do that with regard suspects and other persons, but sadly when the police breaches these laws, there is no crime and sentence provided for in law. This need to be remedied fast.

For example, if a male police officer causes a women suspect to strip naked, which is now against the law, there is no clear crime under which he can be charged, tried, convicted and sentenced.

Likewise, if the police used ‘excessive force’, unjustifiable violence or even cause death when effecting arrest, there is NO specific crime – forcing us to resort to general crimes like Murder, Causing Grievous Harm, etc. That will not do.

There is an urgent need for Parliament to enact laws providing for crimes by police officers caused by failure to comply existing laws, as it is strange just to have laws protecting the rights of suspects/victims, and no stipulated crimes if and when the police act in violation of these laws, thus violating the rights of people that Parliament intended to protect.

Has the Coroner even began investigation?

Interestingly, media reports never mentioned whether the Coroner has even started his/her inquiry into this death. The law is clear that the Coroner must inquire into every death in Malaysia, and the coroner, who is a Magistrate or Sessions Court Judge, someone independent of the police, who will ultimately make a finding after an enquiry/inquest whether the police was criminally liable for the death of the man shot dead by the police. MADPET calls on the Chief Justice Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat to look into this matter, to ensure that the Coroners are doing their jobs professionally.

Police DO Lie – Coroner, EAIC, SUHAKAM has made findings of this

Police do LIE. It is important to recall that it was reported that the Coroner did before find the police criminally liable for causing death of suspects.

On 31/5/2023 that the coroner’s court, presided by Coroner Rasyihah Ghazali, that inquired into the ‘police shooting that resulted in death of 3, ‘…. concluded that there was abuse of power and elements of a criminal nature in the death of three men who were shot at close range by police three years ago. “The shots were not fired in self-defense. There was abuse of power and (actions in the nature of) criminal elements by police in the death of the men,”(FMT, 31/5/2022). Were these police officers even subsequently charged in court?

How many other Coroners came to a conclusion that the police were criminally liable for the deaths in police shooting cases? Unfortunately, Media fails to report Coroner’s findings, and neither is there a place or website where the public can find the Coroners’ findings, especially in police shooting cases that resulted in deaths, or in deaths in custody. MADPET calls on the Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution to be transparent and disclose this information to the public. Ministers should not be waiting to answer ONLY when the question are asked in Parliament.

MADPET calls for NO ‘cover-up’ of this police shooting incident that resulted in death. Anyone, who broke the law, including the police, must be charged and accorded a fair trial, and, if convicted, sentenced according the law, and there should be a deterrent sentence when the criminal is a law enforcement officer or public officer. There should be no ‘selective’ non-prosecution.

MADPET calls for the Coroner to speedily and thoroughly investigate this death without fear or favour. We call for all Coroner findings of police shot dead cases to be transparently disclosed.

MADPET calls on the Malaysian Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM) to immediately investigate, better still conduct a public inquiry, into this death by reason of police shooting.

We find it is useless to call on Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) to inquire into this, as the IPCC is essentially a ‘sorting house’ that will simply send it back to the police to act on it. The IPCC does not even have the power to investigate or conduct a public inquiry, or even publish a report of its findings. The EAIC (Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission) was better as they investigated and published their findings on many cases involving the police, including Death in Custody. The IPCC Act abolished the EAIC’s jurisdiction over the police.

It was most disappointing when on 1/7/2023 the Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution decided  to simply put IPCC Act into force, when it would have been so much better that the government re-tabled the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) Bill, which was tabled by the previous Pakatan Harapan government, with the incorporations of amendments proposed by the Parliamentary Committees that would have made it a better IPCMC. The IPCC Act could have been repealed. MADPET is totally disappointed with what Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, from Pakatan Harapan, that effectively buried the IPCMC.

MADPET calls for the abolition of the IPCC Act, and call for the establishment of an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC), that will have the power to investigate, and also prosecute police officers who broke the law. If the IPCMC existed, they could have also independently investigated cases of police shooting that caused deaths.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)


 

Protesters pelt eggs at M'sian Embassy in Jakarta over Jan 24 fatal shooting
Published:  Jan 31, 2025 10:39 AM
Updated: 9:39 AM

Summary

  • Close to 100 Indonesians protest outside the Malaysian Embassy in Jakarta over a shooting incident in Selangor.

  • Angry over the Jan 24 incident that saw one Indonesian killed and four others injured, the protesters pelt eggs at Malaysia’s national emblem and demand justice.


Protesters pelted eggs at the Malaysian Embassy in Jakarta yesterday as dozens rallied in anger over the Jan 24 shooting of five Indonesians in Selangor, which saw one of them killed.

According to news reports, close to 100 protesters gathered in front of the embassy premises, with some holding banners urging authorities to arrest and charge Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) officers who opened fire at the men during the incident at Malaysian waters off Tanjung Rhu beach in Selangor.

Kompas.com reported that protesters then pelted eggs at the embassy premises, which landed on Malaysia's national emblem and the front gate.

The protest was held a day after the body of the man killed in the shooting was repatriated and buried in his hometown in Riau. He was identified as a 50-year-old migrant worker.

The 3am incident happened when the five men allegedly used a boat to ram a Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) patrol boat before trying to attack law enforcement officers using machetes.

According to the police, MMEA officers had to open fire in self-defence.

While police said they are investigating the incident, the Indonesian Foreign Affairs Ministry said two of the men refuted Malaysian authorities' version and claimed that there was no resistance using sharp weapons. - Malaysiakini, 31/1/2025

Prabowo trusts Malaysia's probe into migrant worker shooting

  • January 30, 2025 20:44 GMT+700
Prabowo trusts Malaysia's probe into migrant worker shooting
President Prabowo Subianto issuing a statement on the sidelines of the 2025 TNI-Polri Leadership Meeting in Jakarta on Thursday (January 30, 2025). (ANTARA/Genta Tenri/rst)
Jakarta (ANTARA) - President Prabowo Subianto has said he believes that Malaysia will conduct a proper investigation into the shooting of five Indonesian migrant workers by Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (APMM) officers in Selangor last week.

"We are certain that Malaysia will carry out the best investigation," he said here on Thursday.

According to Prabowo, the issue was discussed during his recent meeting with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim in Kuala Lumpur.

"In broad outline, yes we discussed it," he confirmed, without providing any further details.

A group of Indonesian migrants was shot at by APMM officers while reportedly attempting to leave Malaysia illegally through the waters of Tanjung Rhu, Selangor, on January 24, 2025.

One worker died and four others were injured in the incident.

The Malaysian authorities claimed the shooting happened when the five Indonesian migrant workers tried to resist arrest.

However, the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied this version of events.

The ministry's director of protection of Indonesian citizens, Judha Nugraha, emphasized there was no resistance from the migrants, based on the accounts of the four survivors, who are currently being treated at Klang Hospital in Malaysia.

Two of the four injured Indonesians were in stable condition when they provided a chronology of the shooting to representatives of the Indonesian Embassy in Kuala Lumpur.

Both said the Indonesian workers did not try to resist arrest by wielding sharp weapons.

Hence, Nugraha said, Indonesia has demanded a thorough investigation into the shooting, including the possibility of excessive use of force by the Malaysian authorities.

He added that the Indonesian Embassy in Kuala Lumpur continues collecting more information to get a clearer picture of the incident.

He also asked the embassy's retainer lawyer to review and prepare future legal steps to follow up on the issue. - Antara News, 30/1/2025

 

Shooting off Morib that killed one, injured 4, classified as attempted murder

KUALA LUMPUR: Police believe that a shooting incident in the waters off Morib Beach was the result of a confrontation between foreigners and the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA).

The incident left one person dead and four others injured.

Selangor police chief Datuk Hussein Omar Khan told Bernama that preliminary investigations revealed the incident occurred after an MMEA patrol boat was rammed four times by another boat, believed to belong to the suspects.

In the incident, two suspects, believed to be foreigners aboard the boat, allegedly attempted to attack MMEA officers with machetes in the waters of Tanjung Rhu around 3am the same day.

"MMEA officers fired several shots at the suspects' boat in self-defence. However, the suspects managed to flee under the cover of darkness," Hussein said.

He added that at 9am the same day, the MMEA received a tip-off from the public about a boat adrift along the coast of Pantai Banting in Kuala Langat.

The MMEA located the boat and found two men inside. One was pronounced dead at the scene, while the other was critically injured and was rushed to Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital in Klang for treatment.

Hussein also confirmed that police received a report regarding three men, suspected to be foreign nationals, who sustained gunshot wounds. They had sought treatment at the Sultan Idris Shah Hospital in Serdang.

He stated that the report was lodged by a medical officer at the hospital's Emergency Department, who was on duty at the time. All three victims were received at 7.30am.

"The three were conscious and had sustained injuries consistent with gunshot wounds," he said.

Hussein added that the case was being investigated under Section 307 of the Penal Code for attempted murder. The case was also being investigated under Section 186 of the Penal Code for obstructing civil servants from discharging their duties.

It was reported yesterday that Hussein had confirmed that a shooting incident had taken place in the waters off Morib Beach in Kuala Langat, Selangor.

At press time, Hussein said the identity of the deceased had yet to be determined and that the injured suspects were believed to be Indonesians.

State Maritime director, Maritime Captain Abdul Muhaimin Muhammad Salleh, in a separate statement, confirmed that a man was found dead and another injured aboard a fibre boat found adrift by the MMEA southwest of Carey Island yesterday morning.

Muhaimin said the blue boat was found approximately 0.4 nautical miles from the island and had no registration number. - NST, 25/1/2025