Tuesday, April 08, 2025

From Death Row to Life Imprisonment for Drug Trafficking – Government/Parliament Oversight as Malaysia wanted to also abolish life imprisonment, and impose fixed term imprisonment (MADPET)

 

Media Statement – 9/4/2025

From Death Row to Life Imprisonment for Drug Trafficking – Government/Parliament Oversight as Malaysia wanted to also abolish life imprisonment, and impose fixed term imprisonment

Courts still bound to follow law, and thus those convicted for Drug Trafficking end up with Life Imprisonment if not Death until Parliament does needed amendments

For as long as Section 39B Dangerous Drugs Act states that the punishment for drug trafficking ‘…shall be punished on conviction with death or imprisonment for life…’, anyone convicted of the offence will be sentenced to death, and, if not to imprisonment for life plus whipping.

That means that the convicted will be hanged to death, or languish in prison until death, and so it can be said to still be a death penalty, be it expedited or delayed until one dies naturally in prison.

As such, when even the Federal Court, vide the Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction of the Federal Court) Act 2023, revised the death penalty of drug traffickers, it had no choice but to impose life imprisonment only – it could not sentence them to imprisonment for a term between 30 years and 40 years as it could for all other death penalty offences. Pope Francis previously stated that ‘Life imprisonment is a hidden death penalty’.

That means that the majority on death row, who were convicted drug traffickers, may have escaped death by hanging, but is now subjected to life imprisonment, and this is just wrong.

It was previously reported that ‘Of the 1,281 people on death row as of Feb 2019, 73 percent (935 people) were convicted of trafficking illicit substances under Section 39(b) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (DDA)…’(Malaysiakini, 10/10/2019). This means that more than 70% convicted drug traffickers who had the death penalty revised to imprisonment are now sentenced to life imprisonment, and this is unacceptable and most unjust – more so after the realization most those convicted for drug trafficking are not kingpins or crime bosses, but mere mules, often young, poor, ‘duped’ and possibly first-time offenders.

It must be noted that the case Umi Azlim Lazim, a 24-year-old university graduate, convicted for trafficking 2.9kg of heroin into China, in May and was sentenced to death.(SCMP, 13/12/2007) and other cases finally opened the eyes of many in Malaysia to the fact that those convicted for trafficking may simply be young, poor or ‘foolish’ persons that were duped, and that led to the thinking that a mandatory death penalty may not be a JUST sentence. Umi’s sentence was subsequently commuted to imprisonment as in China, all death sentences are reviewed by the Supreme People’s Court. Sentences with a two-year reprieve may be commuted to life imprisonment upon good behaviour.

 

Mandatory Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking Was Abolished First in 2017

Mandatory death penalty was abolished earlier in March 2018 for the offence of drug trafficking vide Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017, which thereafter 39B(2), read as follows  “(2) Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence against this Act and shall be punished on conviction with death or imprisonment for life and shall, if he is not sentenced to death, be punished with whipping of not less than fifteen strokes.”

When Malaysia abolished the remaining mandatory death penalty and life imprisonment vide the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023(AMDP Act), which came into force on 4/7/2023, it abolished the mandatory death penalty, and provided an alternative sentence of "imprisonment for a term of not less than thirty years but not exceeding forty years and with whipping”.

However, it failed to amend the alternative life imprisonment sentence for drug trafficking (Section 39B(1) DDA 1952).

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)  believes that it was probably an oversight of the government and Parliament, and that means, even if not sentenced to death, they will be sentenced to life imprisonment.

When the AMDP Act was introduced, it was the government’s intention to not only abolish the mandatory death penalty, but also life imprisonment.

Thus, MADPET calls on the government and Parliament to speedily do the needful amendment, amending the alternative sentence of ‘imprisonment for life’ to ‘of "imprisonment for a term of not less than thirty years but not exceeding forty years’.

MADPET also calls for the removal of the lower limit of the sentence, allowing Court the discretion to impose a just sentence. Alternatively, the lower limit maybe should be 3 or 5 years. First time offenders duped into committing crime should be imprisoned for a short period, and they. Trust in the Courts to impose a just sentence.

It is a serious matter, as the Courts are still sentencing those convicted for drug trafficking to life imprisonment. On 7/1/2025, The Malaysian High Court sentenced a former air steward and his two accomplices to life imprisonment for drug trafficking. “The court sentences each accused to life imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for the first charge and life imprisonment with six strokes of the cane for the second charge.”(Malay Mail, 7/1/2025)

Rightfully and reasonably, Abolition Of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 should have abolished that imprisonment for life in that section 39B offence, and replaced the ‘imprisonment for life’ with ‘imprisonment for a term of not less than thirty years but not exceeding forty years and with whipping’.

Sadly, the 2023 Act failed to do this for the Section 39B offence in the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, and only just amended the number of whippings, REDUCING the minimum whipping from ‘…not less than fifteen strokes" to ‘…not less than twelve strokes".

 

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said 866 individuals received reduced sentences from the Federal Court between Jan 1 and Oct 14, 2024. “Of that number, 52 were prisoners at the appeal stage who were granted a reduction of their death sentences to imprisonment. “Additionally, another 814 individuals were granted a reduction of their death sentences to imprisonment (Malay Mail, 6/11/2024). Unfortunately, the Minister did not reveal how many were for the offence of drug trafficking, and they, as the law stands now, would have been sentenced to imprisonment for life.

Yusoff Rawther and many others are facing trials on charges of drug trafficking, so when Parliament does the needed amendment, the new revised sentence should apply to all crimes, even those committed before that new law comes into force. If not, it will not apply to crimes committed earlier, and the courts will only still be able to sentence them to death or life imprisonment.

Federal Court Should Revise Again Convicted Drug Traffickers Serving Life Imprisonment

Due to this oversight, the question arises whether those who were previously sentenced to death, now sentenced to life imprisonment after Federal Court revision ought to have their sentence revised again by Federal Court after Parliament amends the Dangerous Drugs Act deleting ‘imprisonment for life’ and replacing it for imprisonment within a certain range?

The question also arises whether Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction of the Federal Court) Act 2023, out to be amended to give PERMANENT jurisdiction to the Federal Court to consider revising death or life imprisonment sentences. Of concern are those who have had to be sentence to life imprisonment for drug trafficking because of Parliament’s failure.

Periodic Review by Court of Persons Still Facing Death Sentence

In China, following a death sentence, the sentenced is reviewed after 2 years.

In Indonesia, the new Penal Code (KUHP), adopted in late 2022 which will take into effect in 2026, states that people sentenced to death under the new law would be given a probation period of ten years, during which the death penalty can be commuted to life imprisonment if the convict demonstrates ’commendable behavior ‘.

Hence, MADPET proposes that a law be enacted that will give the Courts the right to review those still facing the death penalty, after 2 years or more, to consider whether the death penalty ought to be revised to a prison sentence, taking into consideration good behavior, repentance and other factors. This is a solution, as there still remains about 140 on death row, and the courts still will sentence people to death so long as the law provides for Death Penalty. So, the number on death row will increase, and Malaysia no longer wants to execute anyone.

It was revealed in Parliament that between November 2023 and October 2024, the number of people on death row dramatically declined from more than 1,300 to 140. (ALIRAN, 22/3/2025)

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) calls for a speedy amendment of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 to substitute life imprisonment with "imprisonment for a term of not less than thirty years but not exceeding forty years and with whipping”. This is to prevent the injustice, of still having to be imprisoned until death, even if one is spared the death penalty.

MADPET also urges for the abolition of the sentence of WHIPPING, where it recently resulted in death (Malaysiakini, 9/10/2024), or alternately at least not stating any mandatory minimum number of whipping that the convicted should receive. In light of the recent tragedy at Pokok Sena Prison, SUHAKAM also called on the government to immediately abolish all forms of corporal punishment, including those codified in the Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Prisons Act, and related legislation. (SUHAKAM,22/10/2024)

MADPET reiterate for the total abolition of death penalty, and a moratorium on executions pending abolition.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

39B  Trafficking in dangerous drug (DANGEROUS DRUGS ACT 1952)

(1) No person shall, on his own behalf or on behalf of any other person, whether or not such other person is in Malaysia-

(a) traffic in a dangerous drug;

(b) offer to traffic in a dangerous drug; or

(c) do or offer to do an act preparatory to or for the purpose of trafficking in a dangerous drug.

(2) Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence against this Act and shall be punished on conviction with death or imprisonment for life and shall, if he is not sentenced to death, be punished with whipping of not less than twelve strokes.


KL High Court hands life sentences to trio convicted of drug trafficking and cultivating cannabis

Judge Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid meted the sentences on K. Karthik, 40, former factory manager C. Praveen, 35, and former salesman Muhammad Afiq Mohd Ali, 26, after ruling that the defence had failed to raise a reasonable doubt in their cases. — Reuters pic
Judge Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid meted the sentences on K. Karthik, 40, former factory manager C. Praveen, 35, and former salesman Muhammad Afiq Mohd Ali, 26, after ruling that the defence had failed to raise a reasonable doubt in their cases. — Reuters pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 7 — A former air steward and his two accomplices were sentenced to life imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane by the High Court today after being convicted of trafficking 707.05 gm of marijuana and cultivating cannabis plants four years ago.

Judge Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid meted the sentences on K. Karthik, 40, former factory manager C. Praveen, 35, and former salesman Muhammad Afiq Mohd Ali, 26, after ruling that the defence had failed to raise a reasonable doubt in their cases.

“The court sentences each accused to life imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for the first charge and life imprisonment with six strokes of the cane for the second charge.

“Both sentences will run concurrently from the date of their arrest on Dec 14, 2021,” the judge said.

Deputy public prosecutor Syajaratudur Abd Rahman appeared for the prosecution, while the three accused were represented by lawyers M. Mathavan, M. Manoharan, and Mohd Yusoff Awang Lah, respectively.

Ten prosecution witnesses and three defence witnesses, namely the accused, testified during the trial, which began in September 2023.

On the first charge, the trio were accused of jointly trafficking 707.05 gm of marijuana at a condominium unit on Jalan Pantai Murni 7, Pantai Sentral, Brickfields, at 10 am on Dec 14, 2021.

They were charged under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, which provides for the death penalty under Section 39B(2) of the same Act, read together with Section 34 of the Penal Code.

They were also charged with jointly cultivating cannabis plants at the same location, date, and time under Section 6B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952.

The offence is punishable under Section 6B(3) of the same Act, read together with Section 34 of the Penal Code, which mandates life imprisonment and not less than six strokes of the cane. — Bernama - Malay Mail, 7/1/2025

 

 

Malaysia’s progress in death penalty reform and indefinite juvenile detention

The Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (Adpan) commends Malaysia’s historic steps towards reducing the use of the death penalty.

Shifting from a mandatory sentencing framework to a discretionary one has had a significant impact: recent parliamentary data reveals that, after resentencing hearings took place between November 2023 and October 2024, the number of people on death row dramatically declined from more than 1,300 to 140. (First meeting of the fourth session of the 15th Parliament, 3 February – 6 March 2025, Question no 1–721.)

Allowing the Federal Court to review each sentence and to consider mitigating factors has given a second chance to many people previously condemned to death and signals a crucial move away from capital punishment as a default.

Further, this has paved the way for better compliance with international human rights standards and the adoption of a rehabilitative, rather than a punitive, approach to justice.

Adpan commends the work of the dedicated capital defence lawyers, the Malaysian Bar, civil society organisations and others whose efforts ensured that all those eligible for resentencing were able to be represented before the court. - ALIRAN, 22/3/2025

Progress – significant decline in death sentences

According to parliamentary data and records from the Prisons Department, the number of people on death row in Malaysia has significantly declined, including a sharp drop in the proportion of women.

As of 22 January, the proportion of women on death row fell from 9.6% in 20223 to just 1.4% in 2025.


 

Over 800 death row sentences commuted to imprisonment under new Act, says Azalina

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said 866 individuals received reduced sentences from the Federal Court between Jan 1 and Oct 14, 2024. — Bernama pic
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said 866 individuals received reduced sentences from the Federal Court between Jan 1 and Oct 14, 2024. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 6 — More than 800 death row inmates in Malaysia have had their sentences commuted to imprisonment under the new Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Review Act 2023.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said 866 individuals received reduced sentences from the Federal Court between Jan 1 and Oct 14, 2024.

“Of that number, 52 were prisoners at the appeal stage who were granted a reduction of their death sentences to imprisonment.

“Additionally, another 814 individuals were granted a reduction of their death sentences to imprisonment through hearings under the Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Review (Temporary Jurisdiction of the Federal Court) Act 2023 [Act 847], which came into effect on September 12, 2023,” she said in a parliamentary written reply to Bukit Gelugor MP Ramkarpal Singh Deo.

Ramkarpal had asked the Prime Minister’s Department for the number of individuals newly sentenced to death from January 1 to October 14 this year, and the number of death penalty commutations during the same period.

Azalina noted that 18 individuals received new death sentences — 12 from the High Court and six from the Court of Appeal. - Malay Mail, 6/11/2024

 

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Zamri Vinoth can be released and investigations can still proceed. Police should investigate without arrest or remand as a NORM – to avoid perception of pre-conviction punishment or other abuses of power. Release all police remand detainees for Hari Raya

 

Media Statement – 30/3/2025

Allegations that Zamri Vinoth has been released from remand is a Non-Issue, as police investigations can continue despite release, and he can still be charged in court if crime has been committed

Police should investigate without arrest or remand as a NORM – to avoid perception of pre-conviction punishment or other abuses of power. Release all police remand detainees for Hari Raya

There is nothing to be concerned about the allegation that preacher Zamri Vinoth appears to have been released from police custody mere hours after police secured a two-day remand order against him. Sadly, the police or government, seemed to failed to confirm or deny this fact.

A suspect being investigated need not be arrested and/or remanded for the purpose of investigation, as the police can investigate without any arrest or remand.

Why should an alleged suspect be kept in police custody for the purpose of investigations, possibly having to spend time most of the time being detained in a police lock-up, whose conditions are bad, and there have been too many cases of alleged torture and even death in police custody in Malaysia.

We recall that there have been many who were not remanded, or even arrested for the purpose of investigation, but were charged in court, tried and even convicted as happened in the case of ex-Prime Minister Najib. Is arrest-remand free investigation just for the elites and upper class?

Remand Detention for the purpose of investigation should be the rare exception not the norm. Remand detention can be perceived as pre-trial punishment, and it is wrong because a suspect, and even an accused is presumed innocent until convicted by court after a fair trial.

We must adhere the legal principle concerning arrest and remand Malaysia, which was also stated by Harun J in the PP V. Tan Kim San [1980] CLJU 66; [1980] 1 LNS 66; [1980] 2 MLJ 98; [1980].

It is public knowledge that crime is rampant and that the police have a difficult job to do. But there are adequate provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code giving the police powers to release persons on bail after arrest pending investigations: see ss. 28, 29, 387 and 388 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The procedure to be followed, therefore, should be to investigate first and arrest later. In cases where it is more expedient to effect an immediate arrest, the police should release the person arrested on police bail if investigations cannot be completed to enable a charge to be preferred before the Magistrate

Some may allege that these arrest and remand detentions may be an abuse of power, maybe also to simply to ‘enrich’ some bad police officers and others. It can be alleged, that detained suspects, enrich those with contracts to supply food to police lock-ups where payment may be based on the number of suspects in detention. As seen in movies, to make a phone call, to get some food from outside, or even a cigarette, all that a suspect in custody need to do is pay some police officer, sometimes ‘a lot of money’, and that will get you what you want, may also be happening in Malaysia. The police resistance to placement of CCTV cameras in all places in a police station may also be because it may jeopardize also wrongful ‘side income generating activities’ and other abuses.

The police or government cannot ‘punish’ any suspect using the remand detention – and sometimes, those remanded say that most of the time, they ‘suffered’ in lock-ups, and sometimes even were never even getting called up for any investigation by the investigation officers, and thus MADPET calls for an end to such abuse of powers by means of unnecessary arrests and remand detention.

In the case of Zamri Vinoth, and even the earlier case of Nabil Ahmad, Azad Jazmin John Louis Jeffri, Radin Amir Affendy and others who made fun of a Hindu practice, the evidence may be obtained without any o real need to arrest and remand them for the purposes of investigations. Arrest and remand should never be used for the purpose to show that police is taking action.

Once, investigation complete, law enforcement will submit the evidence acquired, and then the Public Prosecutor will charge them in court. Sometimes, it may take some time as prosecutors may require more evidence, and remember that no one ought to be charged until the prosecutor believes that they have sufficient evidence to prove to court that the accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt, or a prima facie case at the very least.

Crimes ‘wounding’ religious feelings of persons of another religion

Sirajuddin [Jakim director-general Sirajuddin Suhaimee] stressed that insulting religion is an immoral, inappropriate, and intolerable act in any harmonious society. He also urged an immediate end to religious insults, calling on all parties to act prudently and responsibly when using social media and refraining from making statements, remarks, or writings that could offend religious or racial sensitivities. (Malaysiakini, 29/3/2025) MADPET verily believe that he is rightly referring to all religions in Malaysia.

As such, MADPET calls that all who committed crimes that injured the feelings of persons of other faith or religion to be charged in court and accorded a fair trial. For such crimes, administrative actions like compound offers by Minister or ministry/department may not be the best solution, more so when the Minister/Prime Minister is of the same religion as alleged perpetrators.

Charging them in court is just, and courts will take apology and other matters when it comes to sentencing. Equal treatment under the law, irrespective of the religion of the perpetrator or the victim/s.

Nobody wants to promote a perception that Malaysia will take no action against Muslims who commit crimes against other minority religions in Malaysia, as it this may be inconsistent with the Malaysian policy of respect for all religions and the rule of law.

If Zamri has yet to be released, then MADPET calls for Zamri and others in remand to be released, more so as Hari Raya is approaching, and investigation officers may be on leave and not available to conduct investigations that require personal attendance of suspects at this time.

Remember that remand is just for the purpose of investigations, and not any other reasons. Most suspects will turn up at the police station, when required by the Investigation Officer investigating him/her – so, there is really no reason to keep them in remand detention, save for very exceptional reasons like flight risk or risk that suspect released may tamper with evidence/witnesses – this requires not mere suspicion but a reasonable suspicion based on some evidence. More so, in these modern times, we do have electronic tracking, CCTV and better border control, so the risk of any suspect absconding is minimal.

Suspects are presumed to be innocent, and should not be deprived of the right to celebrate Hari Raya or some other religious or family events. After all, many suspects who suffered remand detention may never even be charged in court at the end. Worse, Malaysia do not even have a law that will compensate those unnecessarily arrested and remanded, which naturally will impact on their lives, the jobs, their income generating activities, their family life and maybe their image. We need such laws, as most victims tend to the poor. MADPET calls for an enactment of a law that will provide compensation for those  ultimately found to be wrongly arrested and/or detained.

MADPET also calls for non-interference of the Prime Minister, Minister, government in the administration of criminal justice in Malaysia. Police and law enforcement duty is only to investigate to find the needed evidence to prove the commission of the crime. Prosecutors decide on the sufficiency of evidence to charge anyone in court, and thereafter prosecute to prove to the Court that said accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Judges evaluate the evidence, and determine guilt, and impose a just sentence, if convicted. 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

See also for the High Court Judgment

The legal principle as to when one should be CHARGED, Arrested and released on Police Bail - The Case of PP v Tan Kim San, judgement of late Supreme Court Judge Harun Mahmud Hashim

 

Zamri released 'within hours' despite 2-day remand order, Bersatu man claims
Published:  Mar 28, 2025 10:25 PM

Summary

  • Port Dickson Bersatu division chief Chegubard says independent preacher Zamri Vinoth was released from police custody before Friday prayers today - a few hours after police secured a remand order against him.

  • The politician claims Zamri was released due to “extraordinary mass public pressure”.


Independent preacher Zamri Vinoth appears to have been released from police custody mere hours after police secured a two-day remand order against him.

ADS

According to Port Dickson Bersatu division chief Badrul Hisham Shaharin, also known as Chegubard, Zamri was released due to “extraordinary mass public pressure”.

In a Facebook post, Badrul said Zamri was allowed to leave before Friday prayers earlier today, noting that he was accompanied by nine pro-bono lawyers during the police’s application to the court for a remand order.

When contacted by Malaysiakini, Zamri declined to comment.

Malaysiakini has also contacted the police and is awaiting a response.

Zamri, 41, was arrested in Kangar, Perlis, yesterday and detained under Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948 and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998.

Posts on temple controversy

Inspector-General of Police Razarudin Husain earlier confirmed that the remand order was granted by magistrate Ana Rozana Nor at the Kangar Magistrate’s Court at approximately 9.30am today.

Razarudin said police had received a report from an individual at 6.30pm the day before the arrest.

Investigations into Zamri relate to his Facebook posts regarding the relocation of the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman temple in Kuala Lumpur, with his remand aimed at assisting probes into allegations of insulting religion and disturbing public order.

The issue of the temple’s relocation had previously sparked public debate, with authorities emphasising strict action against any statements that threatened religious harmony and public order

The controversy began when news broke of plans to demolish the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman temple to make way for a mosque.

The temple’s committee has since confirmed it has reached an agreement with the Kuala Lumpur City Hall to relocate the structure along Jalan Munshi Abdullah, off Jalan Masjid India, to a nearby site about 50m away. - Malaysiakini, 28/3/2025

Zamri Vinoth remanded for two days for alleged religious insult via social media

PETALING JAYA: Controversial preacher Zamri Vinoth has been remanded for two days in connection with comments he allegedly made on social media that allegedly insulted religion and disturbed public order.

Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain told Harian Metro that the remand order was issued by Magistrate Ana Rozana Mohd Nor at the Kangar magistrates’ court in Perlis at approximately 9:30 am today.

The suspect, he said, will be held for two days, starting today and continuing until tomorrow.

Razarudin also confirmed that the 41-year-old was taken into custody for further investigation under Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948 and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998.

ALSO READ: Police arrest freelance preacher over alleged seditious post

Yesterday, the 41-year-old preacher was detained in Taman Melati Indah, Beseri, Kangar, Perlis, and taken to the Padang Besar district police headquarters (IPD).

The preacher was arrested following a police report lodged yesterday at the Dang Wangi police station regarding his post on the relocation of the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple at Jalan Masjid India here to a new site.

Razarudin had said during the interrogation, a total of 24 questions were asked, all of which were answered by the suspect. - Sun, 28/3/2025

Insult on Prophet Muhammad incident regrettable, Jakim says

The Islamic Development Department (Jakim) has expressed regret over the recent incident of insulting Prophet Muhammad on social media.

Jakim director-general Sirajuddin Suhaimee said that such a reckless act reflects a lack of respect for Islam’s position as the religion of the Federation, as enshrined in the Constitution.

“… Jakim has taken measures to report the matter to the MCMC to ensure appropriate action is taken following existing legal provisions,” he said in a statement yesterday.

Sirajuddin stressed that insulting religion is an immoral, inappropriate, and intolerable act in any harmonious society.

He also urged an immediate end to religious insults, calling on all parties to act prudently and responsibly when using social media and refraining from making statements, remarks, or writings that could offend religious or racial sensitivities.

“Such acts will only undermine the harmony and unity of Malaysians, which have been fostered for a long time,” he said.

Sirajuddin said Jakim will intensify efforts and awareness programmes to ensure that people from all segments of society exercise caution and wisdom when using social media and foster a deeper understanding of etiquette and religious sensitivity.

- Bernama, Malaysiakini, 29/3/2025

IGP: Investigation papers on Zamri, Era hosts still with AGC
Published:  Mar 26, 2025 3:20 PM

Summary

  • Inspector-General of Police Razarudin Husain says the Attorney-General’s Chambers is still holding the investigation papers against preacher Zamri Vinoth and three Era FM radio presenters.

  • Police opened separate probes against Zamri and the radio hosts for actions that insulted Hindus.


Inspector-General of Police Razarudin Husain said the investigation paper on independent preacher Zamri Vinoth, who allegedly insulted Hinduism via his recent Facebook post, is still with the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC).

"The papers are still with the AGC," he said in a brief text message to Malaysiakini today.

Malaysiakini reached out to Razarudin for an update on the case against Zamri and another police investigation against three Era FM radio presenters who mocked a Hindu religious ritual during Thaipusam.

On March 12, Razarudin reportedly said police had submitted their findings in the investigation against Zamri to the AGC.

Zamri Vinoth

He had also confirmed then that the police received close to 900 police reports against the controversial preacher.

Zamri, in a Facebook post which was removed by the platform but he later re-uploaded, had likened kavadi bearers during the Hindu Thaipusam festival to individuals who are “possessed and intoxicated”.

The post was removed from the social media platform on March 9 following a request by MCMC.

However, Zamri reportedly re-uploaded the post on his Facebook account soon after it was taken down, prompting DAP lawmaker RSN Rayer to urge authorities to arrest the preacher. - Malaysiakini, 26/3/2025