Media Statement – 23/3/2020
SPECIAL TASK FORCE MAYBE, BUT NOT THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, UNDER
THE DRACONIAN NSC ACT, TO ASSIST HEALTH MINISTRY DEAL WITH COVID-19 SITUATION
MADPET (Malaysians against Death
Penalty and Torture) is perturbed that the Malaysian government may have quietly
and wrongly resorted to using the draconian National Security Council Act 2016(NSC
Act) in this combat to curb and defeat the Covid-19 threat.
In the past few days, the National
Security Council (or Majlis Keselamatan Negara (MKN)) under the NSC Act, seem
to now be making decisions and issuing orders related to the Covid-19 related
issues. The Ministry of Health’s authority may be ousted by the National Security
Council.
The now Prime Minister Muhyiddin
Yassin, and the several Members of Parliament (formerly from PH) may have
forgotten their promises before the last General Elections to abolish, not
repeal, this National Security Council Act 2016(NSC Act).
Phone alerts and messages, previously
seem to have come from the Ministry of Health (MOH) seem to be now coming from
the National Security Council (MKN).
The NSC may be wrongly taking
over power and control from the Ministry of Health, who is really the responsible Ministry under the Prevention And
Control Of Infectious Diseases Act 1988(PACID Act).
Change Minister if Unhappy, but do not take over power of Ministry of
Health
There is no problem for the Prime
Minister, the Malaysian Cabinet or even the Parliament setting up any special
task force or Cabinet Committee, to assists and do the needful to assist the
Ministry of Health but certainly not the National Security Council, formed under
the National Security Council Act 2016(NSC Act).
Ministry of Health is NOT even in the National Security Council
Such a National Security Council which
is very specific about its composition, and does not even include the Ministry
of Health.
The members of the National
Security Council, according to the Act is only the Prime Minister as Chairman,
the Deputy Prime Minister as Deputy Chairman, the Minister charged with the
responsibility for defence, the Minister charged with the responsibility for
home affairs, the Minister charged with the responsibility for communication
and multimedia, the Chief Secretary to the Government, the Chief of Defence
Forces and the Inspector General of Police. The Minister of Health is not in
the National Security Council, and neither is the Director General of Health.
Further, this NSC Act should not even
come into play as this is not a ‘national security’ situation as envisaged or
covered by that NSC Act.
Malaysia already have a law for
this specific situation or concern, and there is no need to resort to any other
Acts including the National Security Council Act(NSC Act).
Prevention And Control Of Infectious Diseases Act 1988(PACID Act) – the applicable
law
At present, Malaysia is
responding to the Covid-19 threat by resorting to that specific Act, that is
meant to deal with this kind of situation, being the Prevention And Control Of Infectious Diseases Act 1988(PACID Act).
Pursuant to this Act, 2 Orders
were issued being Prevention And Control
Of Infectious Diseases (Declaration Of Infected Local Areas) Order 2020(PU(A)
87/2020) and Prevention And Control
Of Infectious Diseases (Measures Within The Infected Local Areas) Regulations
2020(PU(A) 91/2020.
The Ministry responsible under
the Prevention And Control Of Infectious Diseases Act 1988 is reasonably the
Ministry of Health, and as such the Minister of Health. If the Prime Minister
choses, the Prime Minister can have a cabinet reshuffling, remove the current
Minister and appoint a new Minister, or alternatively put himself in charge of
the Health Ministry.
Whilst the first Order(PU(A)
87/2020) declares the whole of Malaysia as being the ‘infected local area, the
second Regulations(PU(A) 91/2020) lays out in detail what are the restrictions
in place, which also includes what businesses/agencies and premises are allowed
to operate during this period, being only those that are providing essential
services, whereby the Schedule provides a detailed list.
For ‘(2) Any
premises not providing essential services may be opened provided that
the owner or occupier of the premises obtains the prior written permission of the Director General and the
Director General may impose any conditions as he thinks fit.’ The schedule
listing ‘essential services’ in item 22 states ‘22. Any services or works
determined by the Minister as essential or critical to public health or safety’
As is most clear, any exemptions
will need the ‘prior written permission of the Director General’, and the Act
is clear that this refers to the Director General of Health.
It is sad that the law is broken
now, when other Ministers or government bodies, possibly without even the ‘written
permission of the Director General’ are seen to be exempting and allowing some
premises that do not clearly fall within the detailed list of ‘essential
services’ to continue operate.
Law Breaking by Other Ministers, Ministries and Government Agencies?
One example of this is when the Plantation
Industries and Commodities Minister Datuk Dr Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali was
reported saying that workers in the plantation and commodities sector have been
exempted from the Movement Control Order and are allowed to resume their work
activities (Bernama, 19/3/2020). There is a question of whether the Minister
even obtained the required ‘prior written permission of the Director General’,
which should also include conditions.
Likewise, some companies may also
be seeking exemptions from other Ministries and even Ministry of International
Trade and Industry (MITI), which is wrong, as any permission or exemptions must
only be sought from the Director General of Health.
Additional Restrictions Permissible But Not Anything in Violation of
PACID Order/Regulations
Whilst the government, being the Federal
government, State government and the Local Government, may rely on other laws
to impose additional restrictions, they should never do anything that
countermands, undermine or violate the orders/regulations made by the Prevention
And Control Of Infectious Diseases Act 1988.
Use of Armed Forces Wrong and Violation of Law
MADPET opposes the use of the
Malaysian Armed Forces, and state that if there is insufficient police and/or
enforcement officers to deal with the situation, there are so many other options
available like the using of recently retired enforcement officers, voluntary
corps, and all other public servants in Ministries and Departments not involved
in the provision of ‘essential services’.
Section 5 of the PACID Act also
provides that, ‘Police, customs and immigration officers and officers from
other government departments and agencies shall render such assistance as any
authorized officer may request for the purpose of enabling him to exercise the
powers vested in him by this Act or the regulations made under this Act.’ There
is no mention of the armed forces.
Deterrent Sentence Under PACID Act – Prison terms to Directors, Owners –
not Compounds or fines?
The Prevention And Control Of
Infectious Diseases Act 1988 should be used against all violators of this law,
whereby the penalty now is in respect of even a first offence, to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding two years or to fine or to both, and the penalty is
higher for repeat offenders.
For companies that violate the Act,
and continue operating, prosecution shall be taken against all Directors and
owners, not just the Company, and a prison term would be a more effective
deterrent, than mere fines. Fines or compounds against companies, that
continued operating, exposing workers (and their families) to the threat of
Covid-19 may be simply inadequate.
Names of the perpetrators,
especially companies, should be disclosed and not ‘hidden’ so as not to affect
the name and reputation of businesses.
It was reported that an unnamed construction
company was allowed to compound their offence by paying RM50, 000 for violating
the PACID restrictions of not operating during this period, but no action was
taken under the PACID Act. The compound was issued under Section 70 (13) of the
Road, Drainage and Building Act 1974 (Act 133). (Star, 19/3/2020)
Violators of the PACID Act and
Regulations in place to combat Covid-19 must be prosecuted under that law and
not some other law, and compound should not be offered to perpetrators. They
should all be charged and tried in open court.
MADPET reiterates its call for the abolition of the draconian National
Security Council Act 2016; and for the dissolution of the National Security
Council formed under this Act;
MADPET also calls for the setting up of a Cabinet or Parliamentary
Committee, which shall include the Health Ministry, to assist the Health
Ministry implement the orders and restrictions imposed pursuant the Prevention
And Control Of Infectious Diseases Act 1988(PACID Act); and
MADPET urges that human rights be respected and protected at all times.
Charles Hector
For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)
******
Plantation, commodity sectors exempted from Movement Restriction Order
19/03/2020 02:03 PM
KUALA LUMPUR, March 19 -- Workers in the plantation and commodities sector have been exempted from the Movement Control Order and are allowed to resume their work activities, said Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Datuk Dr Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali.
He said the ministry Is aware that the enforcement of the order from March 18-31 would have an impact on the sector.
“The ministry is aware of the importance of the oil palm and rubber industries which contribute to the supply chain related to the provision of essential services, such as supplies of cooking oil and medical equipment like gloves and catheters,” he said in a statement today.
Following the exemption, activities such as harvesting and processing fresh fruit bunches by plantation companies, smallholders and palm oil millers may be continued.
The exemption also includes processing of crude palm oil at the refineries for the production of cooking oils to meet local demand.
Rubber tapping is also allowed to continue to ensure the supply of raw materials for medical items such as gloves and catheters, while the timber sector may resume their operations to fulfill their existing contract orders.
However, workers will need to abide by all preventive and control measures including ensuring social distancing and returning home straight after work, as well as practicing good hygiene habits such as washing their hands with soap or hand sanitisers.
Oh, 'that' ban: Construction firm fined RM50k for operating during MCO
Metro News
Thursday, 19 Mar 2020 2:38 PM MYT
By BAVANI M
PETALING JAYA: A construction firm in Kuala Lumpur was compounded for not adhering to the ongoing movement control order (MCO).
The firm was slapped with a RM50,000 fine for carrying out work despite having been given notice to stop work for two weeks.
Two others were ordered to shut down operations immediately after they were found to be carrying out housekeeping at the site.
Under the MCO directive from the government, construction sites and household renovation works are not considered essential services and hence must cease.
DBKL enforcement officers in charge of monitoring construction sites had carried out inspection at about 50 sites by 1pm on Thursday (March 19).
“These are big firms caught breaking the law, and it is disappointing," said DBKL Corporate Planning department director, Khairul Azmir Ahmad.
“The two ordered to close were carrying housekeeping work at the site, while the other one, which was summoned, was fully operational, ’’ he added.
Khairul said the inspections were carried out at construction hotspots in Bukit Bintang, Segambut and Wangsa Maju.
The compound was issued under Section 70 (13) of the Road, Drainage and Building Act 1974 (Act 133).
Non-essential services in the city have to cease until March 31.- Star, 19/3/2020
